Test 2 Flashcards
(68 cards)
Fallacy of equivocation
Meaning of a term is changed in the middle of an argument
The standard of care is the line between
Negligent and non-negligent error
TF. Honesty requires an expert to tell the public what the expert does not know as well as what the expert does know
true
TF there is never any doubt as to exactly how the standard of care is defined in any particular instance bravery teh standard of cares as applied to any particular case is universally defined in varoious engineering codes
False, room for doubt
The view that technology has a life of its own and progresses independently of human control is called
Technological determinism
TF. A primary consequence of the progress of technology in recent decades, especially the Information Age is that all the private property rights of the public are saffer than ever before
False big bro
Which of the following is NOT a four condition for successfully prosecuting someon for negligence
Person must have shown intended cause to harm
The argument that copyright protection is desirable becasue it promotes the production of more such material is an example of
A utilitarian argument
According to our text, computer software is
Not clearly copyrightable or patentable as it has both characteristics of both
Three kinds of liability presented in our text when discussing responsibility for harm are
Intentionally, recklessly, or negligently
TF. The ‘problem of many hands’ is a factor that can never prevent responsible action
False
TF. The most essential element of a lie is the intent to decieve
True
The self - defeating approach described in our text is comparable to
Kant idea of a perfect duty under the categorical imperative in formula of universal LAw
TF. Dishonesty in the engineering profession is wrong only from the respect for person POV
False - it is wrong for utilitarian as well
TF. Organization as well as individuals can be held responsible for harm as the Columbia accident investigation board showed
TRue
The Kansas City hyatt reagency disaster illustrates
A paradigmatic case of an engineering firm failing to meet the standard of care
‘technological pessimism’ as defined in our text is the view that
Holds that the effects of technology have had a mostly negative impact on human well-being
TF. The judgement that one has or has not met the standard of care will never be determined by a jury since they are not competent to judge the decisions of an engineer
FALSE still a jury
TF. Withholding information is wrong becasue it denies the moral autonomy of the responsible decision maker
TRue
TF. A physical event such a s a failure of a structural connection can be both the trigger ring event and the responsible agents
False, repsonicbe agent is. A person
A detailed study of the pinto case reveals
Neither true media nor evil ford
TF. Tech can and has changed the meaning of things in human lives, such as teh meaning of an hour
True
TF. An essential aspect of private property is the ability of the owner to deny the use of it without permission
True
The falllacy of false alternatives is committed when
There is a failure to consider other relevant possibility