test #3 (significance) Part 2 Flashcards
lectures 7-11 (47 cards)
what is the significance of the medieval concept of age?
age wasn’t chronologically fixed, legal protections or capacities weren’t automatically given or denied based on a specific birthday, a child could be held responsible or dismissed in court depending on context not age. this understanding helps explain why there were limited legal categories or protections for children
what is the significance of the medieval concept of sexual consent?
this meant girls and young women had no personal authority to give or refuse consent, their sexuality was under the control of their fathers are husbands. in legal cases, the idea of consent was linked to the status of marriage or property not to protect the bodily autonomy of young people
what is the significance of modern trial practices?
this transformation standardized justice but also introduce new barriers especially for children. While more rational and less reliant on superstition, these system began excluding non-standard evidence
what is the significance hearsay rule?
while the hearsay rule was meant to ensure fairness, it hurt children’s ability to testify since many abuse cases depend on disclosures made to adults
what is the significance of the age of consent?
the age of consent has been raised as a protective mechanism for children, but was used in earlier eras to exclude their own evidence, courts assumed children under certain ages couldn’t understand sex or credible witnesses
what is the significance of wigmore on evidence (1904)?
his view led courts to systematically distrust child witnesses. his arguments were used to support rules requiring corroboration and jury warning when children testified further silencing their voices in abuse trails
what is the significance of the case of the dells (1606)?
shows how medieval and modern trial practices overlapped, divine signs were still taken as proof even as jury trails and evidence rules were emerging, highlights how children were seen as passive victims, whose truth had to come from external signs not their own voice
what is the significance of r v brasier (1779)?
this was the breakthrough ruling that allowed child victims to speak in court without being automatically excluded due to age
what is the significance of r v sankey (1927)?
reflects how courts distrusted children’s words, reinforcing the legacy of wigmore, it made conviction for abuse difficult unless additional proof was available
what is the significance of r v kendall (1962)?
this case cemented decades of skepticism about child witnesses, severely undermining their credibility.
what is the significance of the rediscovery of childrens evidence?
this movement reversed a century-long trend of excluding or devaluing child testimony due to concerns about their competency, courts began to realize that silencing children meant failing to prosecute abuse effectively
what is the significance of the legal duty to report ?
this emerged from medical discoveries in the 1950s such as battered child syndrome and it fundamentally shifted child protection from private to public responsibility
what is the significance of the deluca scandal?
this case showed the failure of institutions to protect children and catalyzed reformed in the legal duty to report. highlighted how professional silence, deference, or fear of consequences allowed abuse to persist
what is the significance of the bagley report (1984)?
this report marked a turning point in public recognition of child sexual abuse as a serious systemic issue, promoting new legal and institutional responses
what is the significance of refinding the idea of sexual consent?
acknowledges that most abusers are not strangers, but trusted adults often within the home. it shifted the law’s focus from maintaining social order to protecting children’s autonomy
what is the significance of police complaints comm v dunlop (1995)?
it reinforced that public servants and professional must act even when their own institutions is implicated
what is the significance of r v bannerman (1966)?
b eliminating the oath-taking barrier, this case allowed younger children who couldn’t understand oaths but could still describe events to give evidence in abuse cases
what is the significance of r v w (r) 1992?
the scc said judges/juries should not automatically assume a child is less credible just because they are young. Instead, credibility should be assessed case by case
what is the significance of r v khan (1993)
the court allowed the mothers testimony about what the child said, creating the khan rule:hearsay from children may be admitted if its nescessary and reliable
what is the significance of removal of oeath-taking barrier (1988)?
courts now check if a child understands the duty ti tell the truth, rather than requiring a formal oath
what is the significance of presumption of competency (2006)?
now, its assumed they can unless proven otherwise- this shift makes it easier for children to be heard in court
what is the significance of the khan rule?
the khan rule helps protect vulnerable children and ensures their experience’s aren’t ignored
what is significance of testimonial aids?
reduce trauma and increases accuracy by making kids feel more secure
what is the significance of the indian act?
the act created a sovereignty problem: Indigenous people had treaties but were still classified outside of citizenship