Test Flashcards

(64 cards)

1
Q

Why is smoking a major cause of lung cancer

A

20th Century smoking was very popular however there has been a significant decrease
Due to this smoking companies are targeting developing countries who are ‘unprepared’ to fight marketing companies off

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Biomedical model- Definition

A
  • Dominant view of the 20th Century
  • Focuses on biological (proximal) causes

It assumes that…

  • illness is caused by bacteria, a faulty gene, a virus or an accident
  • illnesses can be identified and classified by medical professionals
  • diagnosis of symptoms is objective
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When was the Biomedical model helpful…..

A

In the 1900’s when people were dying from infectious diseases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the main social models?

A

Whitehead and Dahlgren’s Social model
Biopsychosocial model
WHO social determinants model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What makes the social models different from the biomedical model?

A

Include biological (proximal) AND psychosocial (distal) factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Social models of health assess these factors…

A

Biological/genetic
Behavioural
Psychological
Social

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is wrong with the WHO model?

A

Only focuses on the obesity epidemic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is inequality?

A
  • Being unequal
  • Quantitative judgement
  • Health inequality = Differences in health between groups
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is inequity?

A
  • An ethical judgement

- Health inequity = Differences in health between groups that are unfair or unjust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The Marmot approach to a health inequality is an inequity…

A

Inequalities that are preventable by reasonable mean are unfair. Putting them right is a matter of social justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What could we do to reduce health inequalities

A

We could ensure that every person has equal opportunity to have equality in health
However this would require…
- A society that values equity, fairness and justice for all
- More ‘health’ resources to reduce inequalities AND/OR
- A more fair, and probably unequal distribution of ‘health’ resources to reduce inequities
- BUT resources are scarce

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is unavoidable scarcity?

A

The resources are finite and not able to be reallocated from other sources

  • e.g. Organ donors, land available for health facilities, etc…
  • could be solved by giving resources to those who need it the most
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is Economic Scarcity?

A

The size of a the resource is determined by its priority

- e.g. Health budget vs spending on other areas, personal/household budget, etc…

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Rationing options for unavoidable scarcity

A

Capacity to benefit- those who would benefit most from that health resource have priority
Equal chances- Everyone has an equal chance of accessing the health resources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Rationing options for economic scarcity

A

Market solution- give all the resources to the people and let them spend as much as they want on health
Equal distribution- give everyone the same amount of health resource
Equitable distribution- distribute the health resources in a way that reduces inequities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Problems with rationing for unavoidable scarcity

A

Capacity to benefit- is very difficult to judge

Equal chances- will often waste resources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Problems with rationing for Economic Scarcity

A

Market solution- will increase inequalities and will often waste resources
Equal distribution- will not reduce inequalities and may increase them
Equitable distribution- will not be seen as ‘fair’ by those with less need

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What should we do to reduce health inequities?

A
  • Prioritise the most important issues that need to be solved
  • To improve inequalities there must be resources moved from somewhere else
  • HOWEVER this is not realistic when dealing with scarce resources
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

A realistic social model should be based on?

Four points

A

Material/structural resources
Culture and behaviour
Historical context
Social selection/discrimination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

The black report 1980 states…

A

Large differences between scio-economic position
Cultural & behavioural aspect leads to discrimination
Artefact- isn’t really a social difference in health inequalities it occurs by the way we measure health

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Material & Structural resources….

A

Material resources- e.g. Income, food, shelter, etc…
Physical structural resources- e.g. Access to health services, education, healthy environments (parks, shops, etc.)
Non-physical structural resources- e.g. Social support/capital, policies and legislation/ regulation, etc… (Protect people at risk of health inequalities)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Culture & Behaviour

A

Different groups in society have different cultures and behaviours, which might be more or less healthy
- if you focus on this they don’t look at other factors = VICTIM BLAMING

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Historical context

A

Some historical events leave ever lasting effects on social groups

  • e.g. Health issues that result due to migration- Pacific Islanders post WW II
  • Natural disaster- earthquake in Christchurch- increase in bad heart health
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Obesity facts- WHO model

A

Those living in LEAST deprived areas- more obese MALES than females
Those living in MORE deprived areas- More obese FEMALES than males
Prevalence of obesity- highest in Pacific Ethnicity
- This is due to unhealthy foods being forced upon them making it culturally acceptable= result of historical context (migration)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Definition of Social Economic Status
A complex mix of social and economic circumstances of an individual or a group of individuals. Measures of SES often include indices of social class, income, occupation, employment status, area of residence, housing quality, household composition and social integration
26
Describe relationship between SES & Health
Statistics consistently show that social groups with generally lower SES experience poor health and lower life expectancy than those with higher SES
27
What are the common health problems of today?
- Cancer - Cardiovascular Disease - Respiratory Disease - obesity - Diabetes - transport accident - intentional self-harm
28
Measures of social economic status- occupational based measures
NZ standard classification of Occupation (NZSCO) NZ Socio-economic index (NZSEI) Register General scale- 1999 Managers get paid more
29
Measures of Social economic status- Non-Occupational measures
Income (poverty)- e.g. Individual income, household income, poverty line, etc... - Individual income doesn't assess social factors e.g. Family members who are sick/disabled or dependants (children) Deprivation- e.g. NZDep Living standards- e.g. ELSI (economic living standards index)
30
NZ Deprivation Index- 9 variables (eight domains)
``` Income x2 Communication access- internet access Employment Transport access Qualifications Living Space- how many rooms & people Home ownership Support- single or double parent household ```
31
How might material/structural explanation help us understand SES related inequalities in health
Intrauterine development - low birth weight= influenced by socio-economic position - babies born into a low socio-economic status they are more likely to have low birth weight - poor maternal nutrition results in extreme low and high birth weights Physical environment Environmental stress Opportunity structures
32
Material & structural health inequalities- physical environment
Damp housing= more health problems; Poverty= damp housing; therefore lack of material resources is the cause
33
Material & structural health inequalities- environmental stress
Stress= more health problems; less control over work conditions= stress; lower SES= less control over work conditions; therefore lack of structural resources is the cause
34
Material and structural health inequalities- opportunity structures
Sedentary behaviour= health problems; less availability of safe recreational areas/facilities in lower SES areas= more sedentary ; therefore structural resources is the cause
35
Absolute poverty
"Welfare level below a reasonable minimum" A condition characterised by severe deprivation of basic human needs, including food, safe drinking water, sanitation facilities, health, shelter, education and information. It depends not only on income but also on access to services
36
Measures of absolute poverty- income based
Looks solely at income - less than US$1.25/day= EXTREME POVERTY - less than US$2/day= MODERATE POVERTY
37
Measures of absolute poverty= food-share method
Based on the cost of basic food and non-food items | - income less than 3x the cost of US department of agriculture's "economy food plan"
38
Measures of absolute poverty- food-energy method
Consumption less than level that meets the food energy requirement
39
Absolute poverty and health
Absolute poverty is an extreme lack of material and/or structural resources, so fundamentally limits the ability to live a healthy live Culture & behaviour, social selection and history are also important in understanding the causes and effects of absolute poverty on health.
40
Relative Poverty
Individuals, families, and groups in the population can be said to be in relative poverty when they lack the resources to obtain the type of diet, participation in activities and have the living conditions and amenities which are customary, or at least widely encouraged, or approved, in the societies to which they belong. They are, in effect, excluded from ordinary living patterns, customs and activities
41
Measures of relative poverty- income based
Looks at income relative to the population - e.g. OECD criteria - less than 50% of the median household income
42
Measures of relative poverty- deprivation measures
Looks at things that people don't have relative to the population - e.g. NZDep
43
Measures of relative poverty- living standard measures
Looks at things people have relative to the population | - e.g. ELSI= economic living standards index
44
Relative Poverty and health
Economic inequality weakens community and societies as a whole - they tend to have greater levels of absolute poverty - provide fewer social safety nets - have weaker social cohesion - larger differences in living standards can cause stress and anxiety can damage people's health
45
Economic inequality and health
What matters in determining mortality and health in society is less the overall wealth of the society and more how evenly wealth is distributed. The more equally wealth is distributed the better the health of that society.
46
Definition of Social Support
Social support is measured by the amount and frequency of contact with social network members and in terms of the perceived quality and stability of supportive relationships.
47
Definition of social capital
Individuals, families, and groups in the population can be said to be in relative poverty when they lack the resources to obtain the type of diet, participation in activities and have the living conditions and amenities which are customary, or at least widely encouraged, or approved, in the societies to which they belong. They are, in effect, excluded from ordinary living patterns, customs and activities
48
Measuring social support/capital
Relational content - satisfaction with quality of support, trust, reciprocity, etc. Social network composition - social network density, homogeneity, gender, etc. Social integration -whether the person has social relationships; how often they meet; marital status; membership of church, etc.
49
Positive social support/capital
Mutual support, cooperation, trust, etc...
50
Negative social support/capital
Sectarianism, ethnocentrism, corruption, etc.
51
Social support/capital and health
Social support/capital can be a very powerful variable in times of crisis or stressful life events. Many studies have shown a strong relationship between the amount of social support/capital available and health outcomes
52
SES effect on health- behaviour and culture
Lower SES groups behave in ways more likely to damage their health and higher SES groups behave in ways that are less likely to damage their health - e.g. Smoking, drinking, bad diet, sedentary, etc.
53
SES effect on health- natural/ social selection
``` Traditionally this explanation has suggested that health is a cause of social class rather than a consequence - healthier individuals are 'selected' into higher classes based on their genetic superiority ```
54
SES effect on health- social selection perspective (natural/social selection)
Healthier individuals are selected into higher classes based on their ability to thrive in society-not genetic advantage but society is structured so that healthy people are advantage - e.g. Discrimination based on health status
55
Social selection perspective- intragenerational vs intergenerational
Intragenerational= individual moving up or down in SES during their life - develop chronic illness then unable to keep working ``` Intergenerational= individual moving up or down SES relative to their class of origin - born with impairment so unable to thrive as much as their parents/siblings ```
56
Social selection perspective- direct vs indirect
Direct= selection based on actual health status - not hiring someone with a hearing impairment Indirect= selection based on a potential health marker - not hiring smokers because they may have/develop health problems
57
SES effect on health- historical context
Groups that have experiences significant and/or traumatic events are often those in lower SES groups OR are more likely to end up in lower SES groups as a result of the event - Loss of land for the Maori leads to structural/material loss as well as change in culture and behaviour
58
Reducing SES inequalities in obesity- solution 1: Improving Resources
We can try to reduce health inequities relating to obesity by improving: - material resources - physical structural resources - non-physical structural resources
59
Obesity reduction- material resources: sales tax exemptions
Issue: limited $ = limited choices Solution: some countries have sales tax exemptions to reduce inequalities and improve health - UK: most food VAT exempt - Australia: GST exemptions for some medical aids and services, as well as 'basic foods' and cars for disabled - NZ government says no as there is limited evidence
60
Obesity= non-physical structural resources: Mandatory Calorie Information
Issue: people have very poor understanding of the number of calories in different foods Solutions: NYC implemented a law in 2007 forcing chain restaurants (15+ outlets) to post the calorie count of each food in the same size and font as the price
61
Obesity= material resources: tax unhealthy foods
Issue: limited $ = limited choices + cheap unhealthy foods Solution: some countries have taxes on unhealthy foods - fast foods taxes --at least 13 states in the U.S. imposed a sales tax on 'prepared food' - sugar and soft drink tax - -more than 20 states in the U.S. have a tax on soft drinks - -France has recently introduced a tax on soft drinks - -Denmark introduced a tax on sugar and fat, and then removed it
62
Obesity= physical structural: better community parks
Issues: people in poorer areas have fewer safer places to engage in physical activity Solution: the lets beat diabetes programme in Counties Manukau worked with a number of stakeholders to turn some unsafe and unused open space into safe parks for families
63
NZ stakeholder
``` Housing NZ corporation CMDHB Let's Beat Diabetes Manukau City Council Parks Department Manurewa Community Board Habitat for Humanity Clendon Community Action Group ```
64
Obesity= non-physical structural: Healthy food policies for School
Issue: Schools has historically offered a lot of unhealthy food options and few healthy options Solution: National policies controlling the foods that schools can offer students - e.g. Mission-on --food and beverage classification system --resources for schools and students --regulation around food offered (only healthy foods)