Testimonial Privileges Flashcards
(48 cards)
In a federal court case arising under federal substantive law, privileges are governed by [federal common law / state law].
Federal common law
Federal substantive law includes which kinds of cases?
All civil cases arising under the Constitution or federal statutes, and all criminal cases
In a federal court case based on diversity jurisdiction, where state substantive law applies to parties’ claims and defenses, the federal court must apply [federal common law / state law] when considering testimonial privilege.
State law
Name the 7 kinds of privilege recognized by federal common law.
(1) Attorney-client privilege
(2) Spousal testimonial privilege
(3) Confidential marital communications privilege
(4) Psychotherapist/social worker-client privilege
(5) Clergy-penitent privilege
(6) Governmental privileges
(7) Privilege against self-incrimination
Who may assert a testimonial privilege?
Generally, any testimonial privilege may only be asserted by the person holding the privilege. In some cases, the person with whom the confidence was shared may assert the privilege on the holder’s behalf.
True or false: To be privileged, a communication must be shown or presumed to have been made in confidence (meaning, not intended to be disclosed to third parties).
True
True or false: Counsel for the parties and the judge may comment on someone’s claim of privilege at trial.
False
Any privilege is waived by:
(1) Failure to claim the privilege;
(2) Voluntary disclosure of the privileged matter by the privilege holder; or
(3) A contractual provision waiving in advance the right to claim a privilege
A privilege based on confidential communications is [destroyed / not destroyed] because it was overheard by someone whose presence is unknown to the parties.
Not destroyed
The attorney-client privilege applies to:
(1) Confidential communications,
(2) Between attorney and client (or representatives of either),
(3) Made during professional legal consultation,
(4) Unless the privilege is waived or an exception is applicable
True or false: Disclosures made before an attorney accepts or declines a case are covered by the attorney-client privilege.
True
A privilege is [waived / not waived] when someone wrongfully discloses information without the privilege-holder’s consent.
Not waived
A waiver by one joint holder [affects / does not affect] the right of the other holder to assert the privilege.
Does not affect
Statements made by corporate officials or employees to an attorney are protected if:
The employees were were authorized or directed by the corporation to make such statements.
True or false: The attorney client-privilege only applies to communications.
True
True or false: The attorney-client privilege applies to underlying information, pre-existing documents, and physical evidence.
False
True or false: Communications made in the known presence and hearing of a stranger are protected by the attorney-client privilege.
False
True or false: Representatives of an attorney or the attorney’s client may be present without destroying the privilege.
True
True or false: The attorney-client privilege applies if the client reasonably believes the attorney is a member of the bar, even if the attorney is not.
True
Communications made to third persons (such as administrative assistants, messengers, or accountants) are confidential and covered by the attorney-client privilege if:
The communications are necessary to transmit information between attorney and client
HYPO: Delbert is sued for his alleged negligence in an auto accident. He tells his attorney what happened and gives her the cell phone with which he was making a call at the time of the accident. Before trial, Delbert is deposed by plaintiff’s counsel:
(1) Must Delbert respond if asked, “What did you tell your attorney about the accident?”
(2) Must Delbert respond if asked, “Describe what you were doing at the time of the accident?”
(3) If served with a subpoena, must Delbert’s attorney produce Delbert’s cell phone?
(1) No. This is protected by the attorney-client privilege.
(2) Yes. The underlying facts of the accident are not protected by the attorney-client privilege.
(3) Yes. Physical evidence is not protected by the attorney-client privilege.
HYPO: Client visits Doctor at Attorney’s request to help Attorney evaluate the extent of Client’s injuries. Will communications between Client and Doctor be privileged under (1) the physician-patient privilege? (2) The attorney-client privilege?
(1) No. Because the visit was not for the purposes of treatment, the physician-patient privilege will not apply.
(2) Yes. The visit was necessary to transmit information between Attorney and Client, so those communications will be protected even though it was between Client and Doctor.
State the rule regarding joint clients for the purposes of the attorney-client privilege.
If 2 or more clients with a common interest consult the same attorney, their communications with the attorney concerning the common interest are privileged as to third parties.
If the joint clients later have a dispute with each other concerning the common interest and one client sues the other, the privilege does not apply as between them.
True or false: For the attorney-client privilege to apply, the primary purpose of the communication may include business advice or social advice in addition to obtaining or rendering legal services.
False. The primary purpose must be to obtain or render legal services.