Tests not in rules Flashcards
(18 cards)
attorney/client privilege test
(1) a communication
(2) made between privileged persons,
(3) in confidence
(4) for the purposes of obtaining or providing legal assistance for client
work product protection can be overridden if:
(1) substantial need, and
(2) info not otherwise easily available
work product test
cts ask if the primary purpose in creating the document was to prepare for actual or potential litigation
medical exam FRCP 35
- in controversy
- good cause
- time, place, manner, conditions, and scope
Newly created legal claims (right to a jury)
- is the claim analogous to one that would have been brought in equity or at law under traditional practice
- Does P seek relief that was traditionally available at law or in equity
Curtis v. Loether–> analogizes civil rights claim to torts claim
What can be appealed
- prejudicial–> caused harm
- preserved–> objected to at trial (or exceptions)
- presented–> presented on appeal in your brief
standards of review
de novo–> Q of law or mixed Qs of law and fact (JMOL, MSJ, MTD)
Clearly erroneous–> fact finding by judge
Abuse of discretion–> discretionary orders: scheduling, discovery management, and trial management
claim preclusion elements
- same claim
- same parties in same configuration
- previous action must have resulted in a valid, final judgment on the merits
Same claim (claim preclusion tests)
- transactional–the assertion of different kinds of theories of relief still constitute a single cause of action if a single group of operative facts give rise to the assertion of relief (transaction/occurrence)
- same evidence test–> second suit is barred “if evidence needed to sustain the second suit would have sustained the first, or if same facts were essential to maintain both actions”
- primary rights–> different claim for each right invaded
6 exceptions to same parties same config
- person who agrees to be bound by the determination of issues in an action between others is bound in accordance with the terms of his agreement
- pre-existing substantive legal relationships–> preceding/successors in property, bailee/bailor, assignee/assignor
- adequate representation by someone with the same interests who was a party
- if she assumed control over the litigation in which that judgment was rendered
- when a person who did not participate in a litigtion later brings suit as the designated representative of a person who was a party to the prior suit
- special statutory scheme may foreclose successive litigation by nonlitigants if consistent with due process
issue preclusion
- same issue
- actually litigated
- resulting in valid final judgment
- necessarily decided
- asserted against a party to earlier lawsuit or in privity
- full and fair opportunity to litigate
unfairness factors for offensive issue prec.
- whether issue fairly fairly determined in prior action
- adequate incentive to fully litigate
- questionable result in prior action (e.g. multiple P anomaly)
- procedural opportunities comparable, and
- whether P could have joined the og action or waited in the wings.
choice of preclusion law
the enforcing ct should apply the preclusion law that the rendering ct would apply.
Exception–> diversity case in fed ct–> apply law of state in which rendering district sits
Right to jury (Am)
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed 20 dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved
Fed cts are cts of limited jx…
Art III §2 says that federal courts are courts of limited jx and must have jx over the sm of a case or controversy. Among the types of cases over which federal courts have smjx are 1) diversity cases 2) federal question cases, and 3) exclusive jx matters…
judicial power shall extend
Art III §2–> judicial power shall extend to all cases and controversies, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution.
Congress’s authority
ART III §1–> judicial power vested in One Supreme Court, and in such inferior cts as Congress may establish
Art I §8–> Congress has the power to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the powers vested in it by the Constitution
Art VI §2–> laws made in pursuance of the Constitution are the supreme lawof the land
finality principle
an order is final when it** resolves the contested matterm** leaving nothing to be done except execution of the judgment