the colonies 1760-1763 Flashcards
(60 cards)
British attitudes towards the colonies
- valued for their contribution to the empire
- vital for supplying raw materials, trade and acting as a buffer against French and Spanish territories
- primarily viewed through a mercantilist lens due to their role in the economy
value of the colonies
- a vital part of the triangular trade system as they exported raw materials such as tobacco and cotton
- accounted for a substantial portion of Britain’s trade
- while direct taxes were limited, the colonies generated significant revenue through customs duties, tariffs and trade policies like the Navigation Acts
salutary neglect
- a British policy where the colonies were allowed considerable freedom to govern themselves and manage their economic affairs with little British interference
- This meant trade regulations were loosely enforced, smuggling was largely ignored and assemblies gained large authority over local matters
population growth of the colonies
Between 1700 and 1763, the population of the colonies increased eightfold to 2 million.
reasons for population growth of the colonies
- a high birth rate as the average woman had 7 children
- a low death rate, less prone to disease as they were scattered over a large area
- large-scale immigration
population of the colonies- European settlement
- the largest group of immigrants, around 15,000 were Scots-Irish Protestants
- Discontented with the land system, recurrent bad harvests and the decline of the linen trade, they left their homeland for economic purposes
population of the colonies- indentured servitude
- some went to the colonies under their own resources
- tended to travel in groups as part of colonisation schemes
- they could also travel under a system of temporary servitude to meet the severe labour shortage
- this enabled them to achieve free passage by entering a contract pledging their labour for a specified number of years, usually 4
population of the colonies- undesirables
- British authorities used the colonies as a dumping ground for ‘undesirables’
- despite colonial protests, Britain transported around 30,000 criminals, vagrants and political prisoners to America
royal colonies
- colonies under direct British control
- governed by officials appointed by the monarch
- the governor had executive authority and was responsible for enforcing British policies
administration in the royal colonies
- a council appointed by the Crown or governor advised the governor and often acted as an upper legislative house
- an assembly elected by the colonists acted as the lower legislative house
charter colonies
- a type of colony governed under charters granted by the Crown
- operated with a greater degree of autonomy
- their charters outlined the legal frameworks for governance
- often allowed the colonies to elect their own governors and legislatures
administration in the charter colonies
- governors were typically elected by colonists who owned property rather than the Crown
- local assemblies held significant power and operated with minimal interference from Britain
- colonists managed their own affairs, particularly in taxation and legislation and so had fewer restrictions than the royal colonies
proprietary colonies
- a type of colony granted by the Crown to proprietors who had full governing rights
- these were responsible for the administration, defence and development
- most had elected assemblies which shared power with the proprietor-appointed governors
- known for their tolerance compared to other colonies
proprietary colonies and Pennsylvania
- established by Penn in 1681 as a safe haven for religious persecuted groups like the Quakers
- based on the principles of religious tolerance
governors
- in most colonies, they were appointed and removed by the monarch
- this wasn’t the case for proprietary colonies where the proprietor appointed the governor, and charter colonies of Connecticut and Rhode Island, where they were popularly elected
responsibilities of governors
- internal administration, law enforcement, granting lands and military matters
- authority was limited
- could be dismissed at will
- average term of office was only 5 years
- they were dependent for political support, revenue and their own salaries on the lower houses of the assemblies
upper houses
- appointed by the governors
- chosen from the colonial elite
- members served as an advisory board to the governors
lower houses
- elected by a wide franchise
- most could be appointed and dismissed at the will of the governors
- their legislation could be vetoed or disallowed by the Privy Coun
responsibilities of the colonial legislatures
- responsible for initiating money bills and controlling expenditures
- represented their provincial communities in a way that neither the governors or upper houses did
aims of colonial legislatures
- main priority was to agree taxes to pay the expenses of the colonial government
- also made local laws
- acted as protectors of local interests
colonial democracy
- representative government had a greater democratic base in the colonies than in Britain
- most adult white males owned enough property to vote
- around 50% could do so, compared to 15% in Britain
colonies not being democratic
- not all men owned sufficient property entitling them to vote
- the amount of property varied between colonies and from time to time
- women and enslaved people couldn’t vote
- higher property qualifications for office, custom and deference towards men of high social standing meant rich landowners were usually elected
local government in New England
- where settlements were relatively compact, authority over local affairs was vested in town meetings
- all freeholders had voting rights
- elected annually, the town meetings fixed local taxes and chose men to administer the town’s business
local government in the middle and southern colonies
- some communities had New England-style town government
- in others, local government was organised by county or parish