The Critical Perspective Flashcards
(42 cards)
Summarize the overview of the critical perspective
Based on relativism and sociology of radical change.
Research assumes a conflict perspective, even if it is not open and visible. Consensus is seen as something that requires an explanation (what is taken for granted, dominant, which interests does it serve).
Research should raise awareness and perhaps be part of changing some domination systems. If reality is socially constructed, it is possible to imagine new ways of organising/understanding.
The aim is to show how arbitrary our truths are and that they are ideological and only serve certain interests.
What is the view on power from a functionalist perspective?
Power is reduced to power to do/influence something, usually seen as legitimate. Assumed that conflict and exercise of power is easily identified. (orthodox studies and Lukes first dimension)
What is the view on power form a critical perspective?
More interest in the power over people/groups, concentrating on oppressive/unjust exercise. Lukes 2nd and 3rd dimensions. Conflicts/power dynamics are not easily identifiable, often hidden behind neutral categories.
What are three main categories that Acker discusses?
Class, Gender and race, and how they lead to production of inequality
What is a main point of Acker’s text regarding the three categories?
It is not enough to only study one category, since they often intersect and influence the situation in different ways simultaneously
What is power generally defined as?
the capacity or potential to influence others in relation to their beliefs, attitudes or activities.
What was Karl Marx’s view on power?
He argued that class interests (capitalist versus worker) follow from social relations concerning ownership/control of means of production, implying that power and conflict are structured into organization design (criticised for exaggerating).
What is Max Weber’s theory of power?
Power is derived from ownership of means of production, but from knowledge and expertise needed to operate the means as much as the ownership.
The two crucial elements to the system of domination are:
- The legitimacy of the organizational leader’s power, and the followers’ perceptions of this as legitimate for those subject to it.
- The creation of an administrative apparatus where followers carry out the commands of the leader.
What is the focus in French and Raven’s theory of power?
Potential ability of one individual to influence another within a certain social situation.
The theory assumes that the “resource” possessed by the individual that will have utility in one situation, will have that usefulness in all situations, and that this usefulness can be judged correctly.
What are French and Raven’s five bases of power?
- Referent
- Expert
- Legitimate
- Reward
- Coercive
What two resources influence and constrain power (French & Raven)?
- Allocative resources: control over physical things such as monetary rewards
- Authoritative resources: involve control over management practices.
How does Lukes’ model treat power?
As a relational construct, and not solely the property of an individual. It is a three-dimensional phenomenon.
What are the three dimensions of Lukes theory of power?
- Focus on individual’s ability to enact commands in observable conflicts. Outcome is observable and shows which side is powerful.
- Extends the analysis by examining the ability of social actors to control the agenda, which is overlooked in the first dimension.
- Sometimes people act without coercion in ways that appear contrary to their self-interests. Manipulation of desires. The social processes where those with power induce the powerless to behave/believe as the power holder wishes, without coercion. Seldom identified.
What are common views on power between Weber’s and Lukes’s concepts of power?
- Power is possessed by the individual.
- Power resides in social elites
- Powerful dominates powerless, resistance futile
- Power is negative and repressive
- Power is visible, exercised when needed
- Knowledge of power sources is empowering
What are common views on power between Foucault’s and Gramsci’s concepts of power?
- Power is relational and pervasive
- Power is found in everyday social practice
- People build their own web of power, resistance possible
- Power is creative and contributes to social order
- Power is imperceptible through everyday routines
- Knowledge buttresses the web of power
What is Foucault’s theory of power?
Power operates within all social institutions, at all levels of interaction and through all individuals.
Followers are both the perpetrators and victims of the power that constrains their behavior (may be self-coerced).
Viewing power as this relational activity widens the focus to the “how” of power, policies and practices.
Power prevents some beahviors while at the same time encouraging others.
Power and knowledge are closely interconnected and reinforce each other.
Hoe have theorists used Foucault’s theories to identify how organizations can resist negative sides of organizational life?
By thinking of power as something not held by individuals, but engendered by the adjustments of dominance and resistance that occur in society more generally, there is a possibility to use power to optimize and grow organization environments and ensure that they contribute better to wider society.
What is Gramsci’s theory of power?
A key term in Gramsci’s model is hegemony, which acknowledges the complexity and mixture of consensus and conflict:
- Truth and power
- Normality and power
- Self discipline/control and power
- Knowledge and power
In essence, it expresses the relationships of leadership and domination that produce a general sense of coordinated reality for most people.
Followers’ behavior must not align with the basic goals of the organization (reproduce hegemonic order).
Power in organizations is often revealed in different forms of resistance. Human capability is different from other resources since followers’ cooperation and commitment always have to be won and sustained by leaders. Power is a consequence and a cause of followership; leaders only become powerful if followers follow.
What produces the power balance necessary for coercion to be effective?
The subordinate’s dependency on the leader (job, income, resources).
Why do leader-coercive behavior occur according to research?
Due to the inability of the victim to defend himself due to a power imbalance
What effects can leader-coercive behavior have?
- Psychological stress-related symptoms
- Physical harm
- Negative effect on coworker, affecting loyalty, commitment and performance
What two perspectives is the debate around power generally divided into?
- Orthodox theories: traditional: power as a phenomenon within hierarchical structures and control systems of organizations. A critical analysis is deemed unnecessary, and hence, power is normalized.
- Dispersed leadership theories: emphasis on promotion of empowerment through transfer of leadership responsibilities to lower levels. Advocate sharing power between leaders and followers.
What is focus primarily on in dispersed leadership theories?
- self-leadership. Employees take responsibility for their own work processes and direction.
- team-based leadership. Centers around autonomous work teams, which have their own leader.
What are Fleming and Spicer’s four sites of organizational power?
- Power in organizations. Struggles around formal organizational boundaries and the exercise of managerial command structures.
- Power through organizations. The organization itself becomes a vehicle to further interests or goals.
- Power over organizations. Draws attention to how elites might compete to influence how an organization develops.
- Power against the organization. Attempts to use extra-organizational spaces to engage in political activity and create change within the sector.