The Decline of Infectious Diseases Flashcards
(39 cards)
Guha’s appraisal of the debate about the decline of infectious diseases and mortality decline?
- McKeown thesis weakened, but Szreter’s alternative thesis is also inadequate.
What was McKeown’s thesis and where did he publish it?
- the modern rise of population can be explained by a mortality decline commencing in the eighteenth century, this decline being ex- plicable, until at least 1900, mainly in terms of the improved living conditions and the better nutrition of the population
What was Szreter’s critique of McKeown’s work?
not only challenged the nutritional improvement hypothesis, but also developed an alternative explanation in- dicating that public health measures played a primary role in combating the early nineteenth-century upsurge of diseases resulting from the insanitary environment created in the course of industrialization
Szreter’s attach on the demographic underpinnings of McKeown’s work
- The 18th century decline in mortality was ‘within the bounds of previous pre-industrial fluctuations in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.’
- McKeown’s thesis ‘that there had been a single movement of continuous and uninterrupted mortality decline across the last three centuries, can no longer be considered valid’
Guha’s view of demgographic changes, and critique of szreter?
Wrigley and Schofield’s ‘The Population History of England’ charts a decline in mortality from 1740s.
If Public Health measures contributed to decline in mortality in mid 19th, what happened from 1740s to 1850s?
How did contemporaries view the improved morality rates in London in the late 18th and early 19th centuries?
- Dr Heberden, 1807:
- ‘cleanliness and ventilation’
- ## ‘variety of vegetables’ (nutrition)
Szreter’s attack on McKeown’s use of evidence, and Guha’s response
Szreter attacks the significance McKeown attached to airborne diseases (which, in their decline indicated the importance of nutrition). (Alternatively, a decline in water/food borne diseases would indicate the importance of public health and hygiene measures)
Guha: McKeown never juxtaposes the two groups of disease
McKeown on the decline in mortality
[t]he decline of mortality was due essentially to a reduction of deaths from infectious diseases
McKeown on the significance of public health intervention
The other major influence on the trend of the infections was reduction of exposure. As a primary influence, this was delayed until the second half of the nineteenth century, when men began to improve the quality of the environment. The initial advances were the purification of water, efficient disposal of sewage, and food hygiene, which together led to a rapid decline of intestinal diseases spread by water and food.
evidence on decline in cause of death in London
W. Farr 1881-1835: deaths by consumption per 100 000 fall from 1121 to 567
H. T. Bullstrode 1838-1851: TB falls 39.9 to 27.3
Guha on the fall in women’s mortality rates
since the exposure to TB was nearly universal in the late nineteenth century, the increased female resistance to this infection is more adequately explained by better nutrition than by any other cause.
Guha on the evidence needed to prove Szreter right
So mortality statistics—the final outcome of the struggle between man and micro-organism, are more adequate to prove McKeown’s case than they are for Szreter, who has the much harder task of demonstrating that it was a fall in exposure that was filtering through to the death rates and causing them to fall.
Guha on Szreter’s treatment of water borne diseases
The reduction in enteric fever mortality is almost certainly one of the triumphs of those local initiatives in water supply and sewage disposal eulogized by Szreter.
In the reports submitted to the Local Government Board, we frequently find reports of local inquiries into out- breaks of this disease accompanied by recommendations for sanitary improve- ments.
Indirect evidence of low exposure to typhoid in late-Victorian England is also supplied by the very high attack rates of this disease among British soldiers posted to India, where it was the leading cause of death in the 1890s
Guha on consensus between McKeown and Szreter, and persistent problems with both
McKeown and Szreter would seem to agree in attributing it to public health activities, and particularly to the improvement in water supply and sewage disposal.
But such an argument presumes that deaths were fewer because illnesses were fewer as a consequence of a reduction in exposure to infection; and this hypothesis is contradicted by the persistently high death rates below five, and especially below one
- resistance lower in young age?
Guha: conclusions
improvement cannot be explained by sanitary measures having prevented the encounter of human and micro-organism, but rather by a change in the outcome of that encounter. There was a shift, as Riley puts it ‘toward re- covery’. So, even as regards the food and water-borne infections public health measures cannot take all, or perhaps even most of the credit for the reduction in mortality.
it is most unlikely that the role of changes in real income, living standards and nutritional status will be found to be a minor one.
Linda Geddes, the return of infectious diseases
There were 6,520 cases of TB in England during 2014
- better general health and nutrition make it less likely that large numbers of people will succumb, even if multi-drug-resistant TB becomes commonplace
- happening ‘because the pathogens that cause them are constantly evolving; and because inadequate numbers of people are being vaccinated.’
In 1901, prior to the introduction of antibiotics and vaccines, 36% of all deaths and 52% of childhood deaths in England and Wales were the result of infectious diseases. Today, it is closer to 12%.
Roy Porter on the prominence of infectious disease
Roy Porter stated in his social history of London that in
Victorian times ‘Air-, water- and bug-borne diseases multiplied, and London was
visited four times by Asiatic cholera.’ Pointing to the class-bias of infectious diseases,
he went on ‘Smallpox, measles, whooping cough and scarlet fever felled labourer’s
families more than the affluent, as did the cholera epidemics of 1832 and 1848–9.
Disease threatened social collapse.’7
revisionist approach to infectious diseases in 19th century britain
Flurin Condrau and Michael Worboys*
national epidemic crises, either as natural or social events, were not that prevalent in
the Victorian era;
secondly, that infectious diseases were never the ‘normal’ cause
of death, which we take to mean the most common or prevalent, which is at least
partly due to the fact that the crucial category of ‘infectious diseases’ is itself a historical
construct.
BONS on the mortality rate due to infectious disease
Flurin Condrau and Michael Worboys*
in the period 1848–72, infectious diseases accounted for only 33
per cent of deaths. In other words, two-thirds of deaths in the mid-Victorian period
were classified as due to non-infectious diseases or unknown causes.
by 1901–10, infectious diseases were only responsible for 20 per cent
Flurin Condrau and Michael Worboys, criticisms of McKeown
Flurin Condrau and Michael Worboys*
However valid McKeown’s provocative
stance about the limited role of medicine for population health may be, we want
to call time on using national aggregates and unhistorical disease categories to analyse
the history of death and disease.
Prefer to use age groups, gender, social classes, region
A summary of McKeown’s thesis
Colgrove
Population growth was due primarily to a decline in mortality from infectious disease. This decline was driven by improved economic conditions that attended the Industrial Revolution, which provided the basis for rising standards of living and, most important, enhanced nutritional status that bolstered resistance to disease.
Other variables that may have been operating concurrently—the development of curative medical interventions, institution of sanitary reforms and other public health measures, and a decline in the virulence of infectious organisms—played at most a marginal role in population change.
The rise in population was due less to human agency in the form of health-enhancing measures than to largely invisible economic forces that changed broad social conditions.
McKeown’s bibliography
Colgrove
4 seminal articles published between 1955 and 1972 in the journal Population Studies
‘The Modern Rise of Population’ and ‘The Role of Medicine: Dream, Mirage, or Nemesis?’ published 1976
Broadly, what were some of the ways that McKeown was criticised?
Colgrove
the propositions that the growth of population was due to a decline in mortality rather than a rise in the birth rate, that active human intervention in the form of medical and public health measures had little to do with the fall in the death rate, and that increasing food supplies led to enhanced nutritional status at the population level.
The methodological shortcomings for which McKeown was condemned included vaguely and imprecisely defining and categorizing the historical phenomena he was analyzing (such as “medical measures,” “standards of living,” and “food distribution”)
The Significance of Wrigley and Schofield’s ‘The Population History of England’
Colgrove
Wrigley and Schofield produced a comprehensive and authoritative volume that conclusively demonstrated the invalidity of a central feature of McKeown’s reasoning—that the growth in population was due to a decline in mortality, not a rise in fertility.