The Development of Employment Law Flashcards
(18 cards)
Patronage
Spoils system
Merit
Pendleton Act of 1883
Curtailment of political activity
Hatch Act of 1939 → No running for office or management of political campaigns
Oklahoma v. United States Civil Service Commission
The federal government can withhold funds from the states and dismiss officials at the state and local levels.
McAuliffe v. Mayor and City of New Bedford
Because the 1st Amendment does not guarantee a right to be a police officer, the City can impose reasonable limitations on police officers.
Rutan v. Republican Party
To authorize hiring freezes, transfers, recalls, promotions, etc., a narrowly connected purpose is necessary.
Yardley v. Hospital Housekeeping Systems; potential counterarguments
No cause of action exists for retaliatory hiring on the basis of receipt of worker’s compensation; policy exception, equity
Centrality of work
Confers citizenship on humans, work for civics and democracy because of diversity and pluralism
Employment at will (default rule)
An employer can fire an employee for any reason without notice
Public policy exception to employment at will (definition)
Evidence of a clearly articulated constitutional/statutory right
Public policy exception to employment at will (4 scenarios)
- Not performing an unlawful act
- Exercising a statutory right
- Serving a public function
- Whistleblowing
Whistleblowing (requirements)
- Reporting → firing
- The employer’s misconduct threatens the public’s health, safety, and wellbeing.
- Codification often requires internal and external reporting.
Other exceptions to employment at will
- Contractually based employment
- Union contract
- Tenure
Employer-employee (employment)
Employment describes full-time and part-time work in addition to family businesses.
Lemmerman v. A.T. William Oil Co.
The boy is an employee because the manger has the power to hire and fire. The boy is an initiate into the world of work.
O’Connor v. Uber Technologies
Remuneration → employee (prima facie). The employer bears the burden of proof.
Borello test (totality of the circumstances)
- Who has the right to control the work?
- Who bears the risk?
- Any investment of equipment/materials?
- Any special skills?
- What is the degree of permanence?
- Is the service an integral part of the business?
Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court (A.B.C. test)
A. The worker is free from the employer’s control.
B. The worker performs work not within the employer’s usual course of business.
C. The worker is customarily engaged in an independent trade, occupation, or business.