The Ethological explination of aggression Flashcards

1
Q

What is the ethological explination about

A

It states that all members of the same species have a selection of steryotyped behaviours which occur in specific conditions and do not require learning. These are called fixed action patterns (FAPs). These are produced by a neural mechanism called an innate releasing mechanism and are triggered by a very specific stimulus known as a sign stimulus. This could create innate aggressive actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What did Tinbergen discover

A

That male stickleback fish produced a fixed sequence of aggressive behaviours when another male enters it’s territory. The sign stimulus in this case was the sight of the males distinctive red underbelly, as if this was covered up the male would not attack

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who discovered the fixed action pattern in male stickleback fish

A

Tinbergen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the characteristics of Fixed Action Patterns

A

-Stereotyped, always the same
-Universal, same in all situations
-Independent of individual experience, innate so no learning involved
-Ballistic, once triggered cannot be changed or stopped
-Specific triggers, each FAP has a specific trigger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is ritualistic aggression

A

Ethologists have shown that not all aggressive behaviour is fighting and instead aggression is ritualised in the form of threat displays. This allows individuals to assess their relative strength before deciding to escalate conflict. This makes costly and dangerous physical aggression less likely to occur.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How do gorillas display ritualised aggression

A

Vocalisations and gestures like chest pounding. Intended to make the opponent back down

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How have anthropologists found evidence of human ritualistic violence

A

Gardner and Heider described how the Dani of New Guinea engaged in highly ritualised patterns of intergroup hostility.Fox also found evidence of ritualised ‘fighting’ among males on Gailic speaking Tory island, where threat displays took the place of physical aggression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Who studied the Dani of New Guinea

A

Gardner and Heider

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Who studied Gailics on Tory Island

A

Fox

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How does big daddy Lorenz sneak into this essay

A

Some animals have weapons like claws wich help them kill. Lorenz claimed that such species must have instinctive inhibitions that prevent them from using these weapons against members of their own species, such as Wolves. Non-hunting species don’t have these weapons, said Lorenz-chan, and so have not developed these inhibitions against hurting their own kind, such as Doves.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the implication of instinctive inhibitions

A

Humans do not naturally have dangerous weapons, and so we have not developed strong inhibitions against killing each other. However technology has made us incredibly good at killing each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why has there been criticism of the ‘instinctive’ view of aggression

A

Lehrman criticised Big Dick Lorenz on his flawless view of aggressive behaviour, claiming that Lorenz had underestimated the role of environmental factors in species type aggressive behaviour patterns (he would never). Environmental facotrs largely the result of learning and experience, interact with innate factors in complicated ways, and ethology nowdays uses behaviour pattern rather than fixed action pattern to reflect that these are not simply innate and can be modified through experinece. As there are subtle differences between members of the same species in aggressive behaviours, they may not be as fixed as Lorenz claimed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Who claimed that King Lorez ignored environmental factors too much

A

Lehrman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why might fixed action patterns not be adaptive for moden times (eval)

A

Because the environment in which humans exist changes so rapidly, Eibl-Eibesfeldt argues that FAP’s such as aggression are no longer adaptive to modern times. The flexibility of human behaviour and the ability to adapt to ever changing worlds has proved more adaptive than the production of stereotyped patterns of behaviour and so human behaviour must be far more varied and less predictable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Who suggested that humans can’t have FAP’s because they aren’t adaptable

A

Eibl-Eibesfeldt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the benefits of ritualised aggression (eval)

A

Main benefit is that it prevents conflicts from going physical. Chagnon describes how native tribes in south america use chest pounding and club fighting contests to settle a conflict rather than more extreme violence. Hoebel found that Inuit Eskimos use song duels to settle grudges and disputes. This shows that even violent cultures can reduce the risk of death with ritualised violence

17
Q

Who studied ritualistic violence in south american tribes

A

Chagnon

18
Q

Who studied rap battles in inuit eskimos

A

Hoebel

19
Q

What is a major flaw in the ‘not killing own species thing’ (eval)

A

That the killing of conspecifics is not that rare, with some species systematically killing their own kind, for example lions kill off cubs of other males when taking over a pride Chimpanzees routinely kill members of another group. This poses a significant challenge to the ethological explination