THE MEDICAL MODEL Flashcards

1
Q

Biochemical explanation of Sz

A

Og. cause= increased dopamine (DA) levels
Newer research- too many DA receptors and more sensitive than neurotypical brain
Means DA absorbed into postsynaptic neurone- excess DA in mesolimbic (motivation, reward- +ve symptoms) and mesocartical (cognitive- -ve) pathways

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Research evidence for biochemical Sz explanation

A
Drugs such as cocaine increases Da release and increases hallucinations 
Pharmaceutical drugs (block DA receptors)- decrease psychotic symptoms= DA has role in Sz
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

An animal study for biochemical Sz explanation

A

Randrup and Munkvan
Give rats amphetamines which with prolonged use will lead to SZ behaviour
Treat with antipsychotics (act on DA) and reduce symptoms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Genetic explanation of Sz

evidence

A

Mirsky- case study on identical female quadruplets born in 1930
All developed Sz by 24
All shared identical genes
History of mental disorders in parents family
// evidence that father abused them
Diathesis (genetic) stress (enviro) model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Brain abnormality explanations for Sz

Role of four ventricles

A

Cavities that hold cerebrospinal fluid pride nutrients and protection- no cognitive functions
Enlarge ventricles- decreases grey matter
Temporal lobe- explains auditory hallucinations
Frontal- incoherent speech and perceptual disturbance (e.g. delusions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Strengths of biochemical explanations

A

quantitative data- objective

Scientific equipment- standardised, replicable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Weaknesses of biochemical explanations

A

Reductionist- enviro may be a contributing factor
Inference of the effect- cannot isolate certain parts of the brain
Decreased eco validity- not having delusion at the time of the scan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Aim for Gottensman

A

Examine how vulnerable the children of two parents with mental illness are to develop a mental illness themselves
Specifically children of parents with Sz and bipolar disorder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Sample for Gottensman

A

3.3 million Ps including offspring
Danish psychiatrist used ICD
Secondary data from database holding off about cohort or Danish population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Four groups for Gottensman

A

Couples who had both been admitted (+kids) who had Sz or bipolar disorder
Coupes where one person had been admitted
Neither parent had any mental illness
No data on diagnosis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Procedure for Gottensman

A

Data on each child linked to parents psychiatric history used Danish Civil registration
Quasi
IV- both parents, one parent or neither
DV- whether their offspring was diagnosed with mental illness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Result for Gottensman

A
  1. 3% children whose parents both had Sz developed Sz by 52
  2. 95% bipolar disorder by the time they were 52
  3. 2% risk of being diagnosed with any mental disorder
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Strengths of Gottensman

A

Large sample- 3.3 million- population validity, representative
Quantitative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Weaknesses of Gottensman

A

Multiple versions of ICD- lacks internal validity

Ethnocentric- only Danish people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

PECH statement on nature/nurture debate (strength)

A

P- supports nature side
E- two parents diagnosed with Sz= 67.5% of children developed a mental disorder
C- control development/offer therapy to try avoid complete disorder, early intervention
H- may not be changeable (e.g. childhood trauma- therapy may not be beneficial)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

PECH statement on reductionist debate (weakness)

A

P- supports reductionist debate
E- doesn’t consider other factors (e.g. upbringing/education)
C- assuming can’t help as genetic
H- scientific= standardised

17
Q

How do selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) work

A

Work by preventing serotonin from being reabsorbed into presynaptic membrane after crossing synapse
Encourage more serotonin to be released by post-synaptic neurone
Then helps regulate serotonin levels
Which regulates DA and noradrenaline
=normal functioning of neurotransmitters

18
Q

Research evidence for SSRIs

A

Beck found that Px depressive symptoms decrease by 20% when taking SSRIs
// relapse risk is significant when remission is achieved so Px are advised to continue medication up to 6 months after remission
More effective for severe depression (not useful for mild/moderate depression)

19
Q

Strengths of biological treatments

A

Symptoms reduced- function better in every day life
Inexpensive in comparison to other therapy (e.g. talking therapy)
Easier and quicker than therapy

20
Q

Weaknesses of biological treatment

A

Decrease adherence if there are lots of side effects

E.g. dizziness