The Nature of God Flashcards

(59 cards)

1
Q

What is the definition of ‘Omnipotent’?

A

All-powerful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the definition of ‘Omniscient’?

A

All-knowing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the definition of ‘Omnibenevolent’?

A

All-good and all loving

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the definition of ‘Eternal’?

A

Timeless, atemporal, being outside the constraints of time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the definition of ‘Everlasting’?

A

Sempiternal, lasting forever on the same timeline as humanity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the definition of ‘Free will’?

A

The ability to make independent choices between real options

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the definition of ‘Existentialism’?

A

A way of thinking that emphasises personal freedom of choice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the definition of ‘Immutable’?

A

Incapable of changing or being affected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What had Christians inherited from the Old Testament?

A

Christians inherited language, symbolism, and poetry, in which God is anthropomorphised and involved within the world. The God in the Old Testament seems to have thoughts and feelings, he is satisfied when people obey his Commandments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How had the writers within the New Testament influenced an understanding of God?

A

The writers of the New Testament were responsible for shaping early Christian thought as they came from a culture in which classical ideas of a timeless, spaceless, unchanging First Cause were very attractive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How were ideas of Plato and Aristotle woven into Christianity?

A

Plato and Aristotle were adopted and woven into Christianity, however some ideas were unsuccessful through the production of apparent contradictions, for example, the idea of ‘perfectness’ and ‘total power’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is ‘the omnipotence paradox’?

A

If omnipotence itself is impossible, then there cannot be any omnipotent beings due to a self-contradictory. This uses the example of whether God can create a stone too heavy for himself to lift, or a knot that he cannot himself untie. On the one hand, omnipotence seems to be being able to do absolutely anything, yet there are some actions that seem impossible for an omnipotent being, such as ‘fail at a task’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why is God’s omnipotence incompatible with omnibenevolence?

A

It would be illogical for God to both be able to do evil, due to his omnipotence, and unable to do evil, due to his omnibenevolence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why is God’s omnipotence incompatible with omniscience?

A

It would be illogical for God to be both able to add to his knowledge, as he is able to do everything, yet at the same time be unable to add to his knowledge due to an his all-knowing nature.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is stated in Genesis 1:3?

A

“And God said ‘Let there be light’ and there was light”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is stated in Amos 5:8?

A

“He who made the Pleiades and Orion, who turns midnight into dawn and darkens day into night, who calls for the waters of the sea and pours them out over the face of the land, the Lord is his name”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is stated in Matthew 19:23-26?

A

“With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What does Anselm depend on?

A

Anselm depends of God’s supreme power to be factual, formulating the ontological arguments, claiming that God is, “that than which nothing greater can be conceived”. If God were anything less omnipotent, then we would be able to conceive of a greater, more perfect and more powerful being, so God by definition must be omnipotent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What does Descartes believe God’s omnipotence menat?

A

When Descartes explored what it meant for God to be perfectly powerful, he came to the conclusion that God can do absolutely anything, even that which is logically impossible. According to Descartes, God could make a square circle as God is the source of logic and has the power to suspend logic or replace it. Therefore, Descartes rejected any other understanding of omnipotence as they limit God’s greatness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

How does Descartes defend the existence of logical contradictions?

A

We are limited by logic and by the smallness of human understanding. God can see how to be self-contradictory because he is omnipotent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What does Descartes theodicy create?

A

If God is capable of suspending the laws of logic, it could be argued that God can allow us to have free will without the consequential evil, then the existence of evil in the world could be something which God could change.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Why does the Bible not support Descartes’ theodicy?

A

The Bible certainly emphasises that the greatness and power of God is on a scale way beyond anything that humans can do or imagine, but it does not necessarily support Descartes idea that literally nothing is impossible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What does the Abraham story from Genesis suggest about Gods omnipotence?

A

Sarah is promised a child, God asks a rhetorical question, ‘is anything too hard for God?’ implying that God can do anything and everything that he wants to.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What does the idea of ‘anything he wants to’ suggest?

A

There are things that God would never want to do because they are against his nature, such as breaking the laws of logic, failing or doing something unjust.

25
What is Aquinas’ theodicy?
God can do anything logically possible, but if it is not logically possible then it cannot be done, even by God. From this it follows that God cannot do anything that is inconsistent with his nature because that would imply a contradiction. God is incorporeal and therefore cannot swim or die or become tired, as well as sin.
26
What is stated within Swinburne’s The Coherence of Theism?
Gods omnipotence means that God cannot do everything, but ‘everything’ has to be understood properly. God can do and create all ‘things’ but self contradictory definitions do not refer to ‘things’.
27
What is suggested in Peter Vardy’s ‘The Puzzle of Evil’?
Omnipotence is much more limited than many Christians have previously suggested. It is wrong to suggest that everything that happens is because of the will of God. However, this limitation is self-imposed. God chose to create the universe knowing what it would mean, therefore it is still right to call God omnipotent as nothing limits his power except when he chooses.
28
What is suggested by John Macquarrie in ‘Principles of Christian Theology’?
Any limitations on Gods omnipotence are self imposed. God is not constrained by logic, nor by the physical world, not by the actions of human beings, but is constrained in his omnipotence merely because he chooses to limit his own power out of love for humanity.
29
What does Hartshorne understands Gods omnipotence to be?
Other beings through their free will, are capable of putting up resistance to God. Therefore, Gods power over them is not total, although his power is always greater than that of any other being. This, for Hartshorne, is more impressive than a being that nothing can challenge. In his view, Gods omnipotence means that God cannot overcome all resistance, not that God will meet no resistance.
30
What does Schleiermacher argue on Gods omniscience?
There is a possible solution to the problem of whether Gods omniscience restricts our freedom. He drew the analogy of the knowledge that close friends have of each others future behaviour to conclude that God could be omniscient while still allowing people to act freely.
31
What is a problem with Schleiermacher’s analogy of partners and friends?
Gods knowledge is said to be infallible. God cannot be wrong, he never makes mistakes. There is nothing that God knows that could turn out to be untrue. God is also said to know the future, rather than making a reliable prediction of it.
32
What does Kant say about freedom?
Without freedom, there can be no moral choices. We have to have genuine options available to us to choose between, not just an illusion that we are making free choice. If God’s omniscience determines our choices, then God cannot justifiably punish us when we do wrong or reward us when we do good.
33
Why does God need to be eternal?
He would be much more limited without the eternal attribute. He would not know what the outcomes of actions might be, he would have to wait and see how events turn out before deciding what to do next. His omnipotence and omniscience would go reduced to a point where God could hardly be called all-powerful and all-knowing.
34
Why would a God who is sempiternal need meet Anselm’s definition of God?
A God who is sempiternal rather than atemporal would not meet Anselm’s definition of ‘a being than which nothing greater can be conceived’, because we would be able to conceive of a greater being than one who was constrained by having to exist within time.
35
Why should we consider concepts of Gods uniqueness to correlate to being outside of time?
Concepts of God’s relationship with time do not recognise the uniqueness of God. God can bring things about in time, and cause changes in people without being changed himself, because God is not a person in the same way we are. There are things that are possible for God, because of the unique nature of his existence, even if we cannot see how they are possible with our limited understanding.
36
Why does God being sempiternal limit our free will?
When God already knows what we are going to choose and how things will work out for us, in a fixed and certain way, there is nothing we can influence or change and nothing for which we can be held responsible.
37
What was Augustine’s view on God as timeless?
God has made the world at a particular point in time, which raised the issue of what God has been doing all the while beforehand if God moves alongside the same time line as we do. If God is everlasting, why did he pick that particular moment to create the universe. The biblical account of creation kings towards a timeless God, as there cannot have been a ‘before’ for God.
38
What did Richard Creel suggest in his book ‘Divine Impassibility’?
God can be loving as well as immutable. God can know what his own will is, in response to any of an infinite number of possibilities.
39
What does Boethius argue on the problem of Gods omniscience?
He was particularly concerned with the judgement of God, and whether it would be fair of God to praise or blame people if they did not have real moral freedom and were constrained by what God already knew about the future.
40
What does Boethius state within Book V ‘The Consolation of Philosophy’?
“How can God foreknow that these things will happen, if they are uncertain”. If God knows that something will happen, when in fact it is uncertain, then God’s knowledge is mistaken. However, if God knows that something might happen, then it can hardly be considered ‘knowledge’, and puts God in a position of being no wiser. If God firmly knows things, then they become inevitable, becoming unfair.
41
What is further stated by Boethius within Book V of ‘The Consolation of Philosophy’?
“The punishment of the wicked and reward for the good, will be seen to be the most unjust for all; for men are driven to good or evil not by their own will but by the fixed necessity of what is to be”.
42
In what way does Boethius realise he was mistaken?
God can see things in a different way from what we see them. Humans exist within time. They have pasts that are fixed, a present that is gone within an instant and futures that are uncertain. Thus because futures are uncertain, humans have genuine free will.
43
What does Boethius state about Gods omniscience within Book V of ‘The Consolation of Philosophy’?
“His knowledge, too, transcends all temporal change and abides in the immediacy of his presence’. Good can look down on us, moving along our timelines, ‘as though from a lofty peak above them’.
44
What does Boethius conclude within his understanding of God’s omniscience?
God cannot be accused of a lack of wisdom in not realising that Adam and Eve would disobey him, nor of a lack of morality in allowing evil dictators to be born. God does not know what will happen in the future, as there is no future for God. All time happens in ‘simultaneity’ for God. We therefore have genuine free choice and can be rewarded or punished with justice.
45
What is Anselm’s four-dimensionalist approach to the timelessness of God?
Anselm’s view contrasts with ‘presentism’. We humans, he thought, live in a presentist way, but this is not how things are for God. God is timeless, just as he is spaceless, whereas we humans are constrained by time and space. God is not constrained by them but is in control of them.
46
What does ‘presentism’ refer to?
Only the present moment exists. The past is gone, and the future has not happened yet. The only reality is that which exists in this moment.
47
Does Anselm suggest we have free will?
God can see the free choices that we make, God literally can see us in our pasts, our presents and our futures, because of his eternal timelessness. Therefore, God can justifiably judge us and we can be held morally responsible for our actions, which we choose freely and which God can see at all times.
48
What is Swinburne’s view of a God in time?
A person with a life has to be changeable, he argues, in order to have relationships and respond to people according to what they do. A timeless God would not be able to love, because a timeless God is immutable and is therefore not affected by anything. Therefore, God has to exist within time for God to be able to respond to us with love.
49
What does the story in Isaiah of King Hezekiah’s illness suggest?
God had been planning to end Hezekiah’s life, but was persuaded to change his mind in response to Hezekiah’s prayer.
50
What is stated in the story in Isaiah of King Hezekiah’s illness?
“I have heard your prayer and seen your tears; I will add fifteen years to your life.”
51
What is suggested in God’s omnibenevolence and justice?
The Christian understanding of God holds unequivocally that God’s nature is love. Gods love, like Gods existence, has no cause. It is not brought into being by something else but is part of the nature id God from the start.
52
How does Gods goodness compare to Plato’s ‘Form of the Good’?
The goodness of Gos described in the Bible is demonstrated as love for the people. Plato’s Form of the Good does not have feelings, and does not care whether people measure up to it or not. But the love of the biblical God is a love which is interactive, which requires a response and cares about what that response will be.
53
What philosophical problems arise from Gods love?
Does Gods come and go or does it stay the same? Can God be affected, and be hurt, and suffer, and if so does this apply a limitation to Gods omnipotence? Does God remain unchanging, does this suggest limits to his relationship with humanity?
54
What is stated in 1 John 4:7-9?
“Whoever does not love, does not know God, because God is love. This is how God showed his love among us: He sent his one and only Son into the world that we might love through him.”
55
What is Aquinas’ analogy for Gods love?
When we speak of the love of God, we are using analogy. We are talking of a love that is like ours in some respects, but we have to bear in mind that God is infinitely greater than us and that we can only understand a tiny proportion of divine love.
56
What does Moltmann argue on the existence of God within time?
Christianity shows that God does not sit outside time being perfect and immutable. He gets involved with us and shares the pains of human existence to the extent of suffering death by torture. Concluding that God exists within time rather than in the timeless, eternal way suggested by Anselm.
57
Why is God having a range of attributes manageable?
It is an effort to break God down into manageable pieces so that we can comprehend him more easily.
58
What does Dawkins argue on God’s ‘infinite’ nature?
Argues that this ‘it’s a mystery’ kind of thinking is lazy and damaging. He argues that we should not be satisfied to set aside difficult questions and accept that we can not understand. If the idea of God is unintelligible to us then this is reason to stop claiming that such a being exists.
59
What does Augustine wonder on God existing within time?
Augustine wondered what God was doing all the time before he created the universe, and this could be a problem for those who believe that God exists in time in a sempiternal way.