The people, the parliament and the courts SAC4A

Question 1

4 factors which either support or hinder the ability of parliament to make laws

Answer 1

the roles and houses of parl
the representative nature or parl
political pressures
restrictions on lawmaking powers of parl

Question 2

The roles and Houses of Parliament

1. Majority govt

Answer 2

if a political party holds majority of seats in the LH then any bills that are proposed by govt will likely be accepted and passed.

Question 3

The roles and Houses of parliament

2. Majority government in both houses

Answer 3

if a political party holds govt in both houses, then it has the power to introduce bills and likely members of parl will vote according to party lines
meaning the bill ill be passed more efficiently, however there is a lack of debate and potential for rubber stamp to occur with errors and lack of scrutiny.

Question 4

The roles and Houses of Parliament

3.Minority government

Answer 4

when a political party fails to secure the majority seats in LH or when both parties secure the same number of seats, this is referred to as a hung parliament
then a majority political party must seek support from members of majority political parties must seek support from members of minor political parties to form govt
this causes constant negotiation with minor parties and idea to pass bills this can result in bills being diluted

Question 5

The roles and Houses of Parliament

4.A hostile senate

Answer 5

majority party doesn’t hold majority of seats in the UH
may face significant opposition from the senate and crossbones which can vote together to force the government to amend its original bill

Question 6

The roles and Houses of Parliament

5. balance of power

Answer 6

no single political party has majority of seeks in either one of houses, members of the cross bench may band together and vote against government bills

as a result, to win support of the minority parties and independents to get bills passed through the UH

the balance of power is independents, members from minor parties do not represent the views and values of the majority of people and yet they have a disproportionate amount of influence

more effective parliament as the govt may need to take into consideration wider views and perspectives to reflect com values

Question 7

Representative nature of parliament

1. Representative government

Answer 7

MPs have been democratically elected by their voters in order to inciporate the views and values into laws, if Mps X act then face not being relected

Question 8

Representative nature of parliament

2. Representative majority

Answer 8

although Mps should strike to uphold the views and values of their electorate doing so can leaf to supporting and passing bills that are popular rather than passing controversial laws that may be required

Question 9

Representative nature of parliament

3.Democratic elections

Answer 9

regular elections ensure that the citizens of Australia can monitor and hold their MPS account and should they not not acting in accordance with the requirement of their people

Question 10

What are political pressures

Answer 10

direct or indirect that exist within a political party or from sources outside of parliament, parl likely respond to these pressures

Question 11

Political pressures

Domestic

Answer 11

infl made by indie groups from indiv or orang within parliament, this includes petitions, demonstrations, the media, social media, can face not voting for them in next election.

eg right to life Australia

Question 12

Political pressures

Internal

Answer 12

infl within parliament, MPs may disagree w a parties bill as x align with who they represent, or conscience vote where priotise moral or ethical views or crossing the bench

Question 13

Political pressures

International

Answer 13

outside of Australia from other countries or international organisations eg UN
incl international treaties, passing leg to uphold these eg conventions of the right of child to raise minim age of crime liability

Question 14

Restrictions of parliaments lawmaking power

Jurisdictional limitations

Answer 14

within area or lawmaking, jurisdiction
t/f parliament can be restricted from legislating outside area of lawmaking eg in residual powers

Question 15

Restrictions of parliaments lawmaking power

The legislative process

Answer 15

must pass bill in both houses including ,multiple stages whereby scrutinised debated and amended if needed

parl cannot bypass these stages to make a law and needs royal assent

Question 16

Restrictions of parliaments lawmaking power

The Australian constitution

Answer 16

Division of lawmaking powers can only make law within areas of const and if acting beyond this can be challenged in HC and deemed ultra vires

Question 17

Restrictions of parliaments lawmaking power

Specific prohibitions

Answer 17

const further imposes limits on parl

expressly banning parliaments from making laws eg states are prohibited from coinage
banning Cth on leg re express rights
not provided in s51

Question 18

Restrictions of parliaments lawmaking powers

High court of Australia

Answer 18

HC as guardian of the constitution can declare leg ultra vires and t/f invalid, cannot be abrogated acts as limitation on parl as cannot circumvent without a referendum

Question 19

when do courts make laws

Answer 19

when a dispute arises between parties but there is not legislation covering the matter (test case)
when a legal principle is disputer regarding the interpretation of an act
when party wants a more senior court to review the decision of error in judgment

only when sets a precedent that lower courts follow

Question 20

what is common law

Answer 20

law made by the courts based on decisions of cases

Question 21

what is the doctrine of precedent

Answer 21

ensures similar cases are dealt in similar ways superior courts sets a precedent that lower courts follow

Question 22

precdent

Answer 22

reported judgment of a court that establishes a point of law

Question 23

ratio decidendi

Answer 23

reason for decision and legal principle that the judge has used to come to their decision, only ratio decided is used in later cases

Question 24

obiter dictum

Answer 24

comments made by judgement on question of law, doesn’t form ratio dec as persuasive precedent

Question 25

the doctrine of precedent operates on what notion

Answer 25

stare decisis

Question 26

stare decisis

Answer 26

rule undermines doctrine of precedent where lower courts should follow descions of higher courts in like cases forms rules for flexibility of precedent.

Question 27

binding precedent and what makes it binding

Answer 27

established by a higher art in similar like case, that the current judge must follow -precedent established by higher crt is in SAME hierarchy -case is of similar 'like' nature

Question 28

persuasive precedent and why it is persuasive

Answer 28

legal prin that is not binding on current judge t/d do not have to follow -within a diff crt heirarchy -made by judge on same level -the facts are not similar enough in nature -obiter dictum statements used to influence design

Question 29

4 ways precedent is flexible

Answer 29

RODD reversing overruling disapproving distinguishing

Question 30

reversing precedent

Answer 30

higher crt hears a case on APPEAL and decides that the lower crt which had heard the matter at trial was incorrect and in doing so reverse the decision

Question 31

overruling precedent

Answer 31

a case before a higher crt relies on previous precedent from a EARLIER AND DIFFERENT case by a lower case, pressing judge may believe that previous case is wrongly decided and not follow this decision, hence overrule

Question 32

disapproving precedent

Answer 32

same level precedent as not bound may choose not to follow previous descion by earlier case then disapprove of descion, their option of law differs from earlier judge or when inferior judges who are bound by precedent disagree with it but must follow so when handing down decision they make comment on precedent as a signal for superior courts or parl to change the law

Question 33

distinguishing precedent

Answer 33

only bound by 'like' cases, when sufficiently different from previous case then not bound, if a judge is satisfied that the facts are sufficiently diff whereby would be unjust to apply earlier precedent than earlier precedent will be distinguished.

Question 34

what is statutory interpretation

Answer 34

when judges decide on meaning and application of words and terms within an act to resolve a dispute before the court

Question 35

why/ when are courts req to interpret the act\t

Answer 35

- the intention of the act is not clear, if parls intentions are not clear enough, eg accurate instruction and direction given to courts -problems relating to defining words, wording may be broad but courts need to interpret if specific situation, or words may not be defined in act -words may not cover recent changes, may b outdated and needs to be revised

Question 36

how do courts interpret statues

Answer 36

the courts consider what parliament had in mind when making the legislation, eg what was the intent and purpose when the bill was drafted this includes -intrinsic from within the act eg other sections -extrinsic from outside of act eg dictionary

Question 37

what effect does statutory interpretation have on law

Answer 37

forming a precedent, if made by a sup crt then the ratio decided will form a binding decision by lower courts in same hierarchy limit the scope of legislation, if courts give narrow or limited integration to words or terms the interpretation may limit the range of circumstances that the act may apply to increase the scope of the legislation, if the courts give a broad inter to words may extend the range of circumstances

Question 38

studded belt case facts, decision and impact

Answer 38

man charged with an offence of possession of. regulated weapon under control of weapons act 1900 vic, as cannot carry reg weapon w/o lawful excuse, and studded belt was considered weapon decision was in the appeal the studded belt is not considered weapon and lawful excuse of using to hold up pants impact of narrowing the scope of legislating and parliament codified into statute

Question 39

Factors affecting the courts ability to make precedent doctrine of precedent

Answer 39

courts are not free to make laws in the same ways as parl. Unlike parl, the courts cannot make laws as an immediate response to com demands or when a general need is perceived

Question 40

Factors affecting the courts ability to make precedent doctrine of precedent assisting courts lawmaking

Answer 40

1.stare decides ensures conistency because lower courts must follow precedent set by sup crt in same hierarchy of sim material facts 2.ensures predictability of cases parties can anticipate how law will be applied based on old cases 3.judges make law through establishing precedent and have power to expand/narrow meaning of leg 4.judges can clarify or update meaning of words

Question 41

Factors affecting the courts ability to make precedent doctrine of precedent limiting courts lawmaking

Answer 41

1.if lower courts cannot distinguish, then bound to follow precedent may be outdated or unjust 2. locating, interpreting and applying precedent from previous cases is time consuming and costly 3.must wait until case before them before establishing cl 4.judges can only clarify law ex post facto, meaning problem already occurs and judges only respond to provide clarification

Question 42

Factors affecting the courts ability to make precedent judicial conservatism

Answer 42

judges adopt a narrow interpretation of law when applying meaning to acts of parl, they avoid controversy and leave lawmaking to parl

Question 43

Factors affecting the courts ability to make precedent judicial conservatism assit court lawmkaing

Answer 43

maintains stability of law as judges are catuios and show resistant re significant changes in law lessens possibility of appeals on question of law allow parl whom reflect the views and values of com to make more sig changes of law

Question 44

Factors affecting the courts ability to make precedent judicial conservatism limit court lawmaking

Answer 44

restricts ability of courts to make major and controversial changes in law may discourage judges from considering a range of social and political factors may be seen as not progressive enough nor reflect 21st century values

Question 45

Factors affecting the courts ability to make precedent judicial activism

Answer 45

judges consider a range of social and political factors when interpreting acts and deciding cases, more progressive as cause controversy and reflect political views of judges

Question 46

Factors affecting the courts ability to make precedent judicial conservatism assit court lawmaking

Answer 46

broadly interpret statues that recognise the rights of people judges consider a range of social and political factors and com values may be more fair judgments more creative in designs and making sig legal change

Question 47

Factors affecting the courts ability to make precedent judicial conservatism limit courts lawmaking

Answer 47

can lead to more appeals of question of law making more radical changes which don't always reflect com values and beyond community level of comfort

Question 48

Factors affecting the courts ability to make precedent the requirement of standing

Answer 48

standing is the right of a party to start a legislation in court, in order to have standing a party must be considered sufficiently connected to and have an interest in the court action g directly affected by an action, if a person doesn't stand to loose something they don't have standing

Question 49

Factors affecting the courts ability to make precedent the requirement of standing assist courts lawmaking

Answer 49

ensures cases are only brought by people who are genuinely affected by an issue or matter, rather than waisting court time and resources encourages ppl x directly affected by an issue or matter to seek other avenues eg MPS

Question 50

Factors affecting the courts ability to make precedent the requirement of standing limit courts lawmaking

Answer 50

means ppl w general interest have no right to pursue a legal challenge on behalf of public interest or common good potential improvements to law could have been made by listening to those w interest

Question 51

Factors affecting the courts ability to make precedent Cost and time of bringing a case to court

Answer 51

court is expensive, may be more reluctant to take novel cases to court due to uncertainty of the outcome, there are court fees and legal fees eg disbursement fees decisions are not reached quickly, courts must hear all arguments by both parties and a decision takes considerable amounts of time

Question 52

what is a novel case

Answer 52

a case concerned w particular issue of legal question that had not been decided before in a court of a superior court in same hierarchy

Question 53

Factors affecting the courts ability to make precedent Cost and time of bringing a case to court assit courts lawmaking

Answer 53

can manage disputes that issues are narrowed, saving costs and allowing parties to proceed all the way to trial high costs may mean only legitimate cases are pursued alll way to appeal courts can make decision quickly once dispute before them not required to follow lengthy processes like those develop eg passing bill

Question 54

Factors affecting the courts ability to make precedent Cost and time of bringing a case to court limit courts lawmaking

Answer 54

HC can deter litigants who may x afford costs or LA, from pursuing a case = x ruling/ precedent devleoped high costs may deter appeal courts esp w established precedent can take months to hear and determine complex cases parties may be delayed in getting a case to trial

Question 55

the supermacy of parliament

Answer 55

they are given the primary role of lawmaking withinin the constitution members are democratically elected parl required to be representative of the people parliament establishes the jurisdiction of courts parl can pass laws that override common laws parliament can make/changes laws at any time however, courts can declare laws made by parl ultra vires if it deems that parl

Question 56

courts ability to influence parliament

Answer 56

obiter statments/ ratio decidendi, courts can directly inf parliament to make/chnage the law . when handing down judgements can make comments as part of their ratio decided or obiter statements that can encourage parl to initiate changes to the law. doctrine of precedent- parl can also be encouraged to change the law if courts are bound by previous precedent or if judges have chosen to interpret outdated statues in a conservative way community outrage, a courts decision may cause public dissent or outrage as a result of what the community believes to be an unjust decision. due to community dissatisfaction parl may be pressured to respond in order to be representative of the community to be re-elected

Question 57

stautroy interpretation as a factor relationship b/w courts and palm

Answer 57

judges are called to apply meaning to words and phrases in acts made by parliament to make a ruling. by giving meaning to under words and phases in statues, judges are able to clarify legislation so that they can be applied to the case at hand, but depending on the position of the court, create a precedent which allows act to be updated to reflect current views

Question 58

codification and abrogation of common law

Answer 58

codification- if parl agrees with ruling it can decide to bring the common law principles established by the courts into statue law. It does so by drafting ga bill and passing it within parl, and should bill be such then becomes an act, the cl principle has been codified or strengthened as a result of now being enshrined in legislation abrogation- if disagrees then can abrogate the common law by drafting and passing a bill that parl disregards or contravenes w common law principle. as parl is the sup lawmaking authority, the act it has created will now stand and CL abolished.

Question 59

trigwell case

Answer 59

facts trigwell and family were severely injured as a result of another driver swerving to not hit a stray sheep that had escaped through fence trig well wanted conmpesation, insurance company responsible as R died HC decided to persuaded by a case in Uk where animals x have to be fenced b/c not important at the time as minimal cars --> parliament abrogated by changing wrongs act