The Problem Of Evil Flashcards

1
Q

What is the problem of evil?

A

An argument against the existence of God that suggests an all loving and powerful God cannot exist with evil. As we know evil exist, God must not exist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is moral evil?

A

Evil caused by the free actions of humans

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is natural evil?

A

Evil caused by nature that humans cannot control, e.g earthquakes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the logical problem of evil?

A

Evil is logically a problem for believers as it challenged the belief of an all loving and powerful God
- How can God be all powerful and not stop evil?
- How can God be all loving and not want to stop evil?
An all loving and powerful God cannot logically exist with evil.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who first suggested the logical problem of evil and when?

A

Epicurus, in third century BCE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the evidential problem of evil?

A

Evidence for the existence of evil can be found in the seemingly unnecessarily extreme suffering of people, particularly innocent people. For example;
- Natural disasters cause suffering
- Moral evil causing humans to make others suffer
- Suffering between animals as they kill each other for food.
Why does God create such extreme suffering?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Name some philosophers that believed the problem of evil disproves God

A
  • Epicurus
  • John Stuart Mill
  • Richard Dawkins
  • Mackie
  • Peter Vardy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did John Stuart Mill say about the problem of evil?

A

Evil and suffering within the natural world is enough to prove there can be no benevolent God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did Richard Dawkins say about the problem of evil?

A

Evil is present in nature, such as the dagger wasp that paralyses caterpillars to lay eggs in, killing it. Surely a loving God would not create this?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did Mackie say about the problem of evil?

A
  • Developed the inconsistent triad
  • God cannot be all loving, knowing and powerful in evil exists.
  • It is illogical that evil exists, though God knows about it, can and wants to stop it.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did Peter Vardy say about natural evil?

A

Developed 5 different types of natural evil;
- Natural disasters
- Disease
- Phycological issues
- Human fruity
- Animal suffering

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the issue with out definition of evil?

A

Are natural things really evil?
Are natural disasters really evil, if the natural disaster doesn’t know what it’s doing?
Are animals evil if they are just followed by their instincts?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does Augustine believe is the cause of all evil.

A

The actions of Adam and Eve during the Fall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How does Augustine believe God made the world?

A

God could only make a perfect world, because he is perfect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Summarise Augustine’s solution to the problem of evil.

A
  • God created the world perfectly.
  • However, all things fall short of this perfection due to the fall.
  • This led to a loss of harmony in nature, which developed into natural sin
  • The sin of humans led to moral evil
  • Because God is just, he cannot stop evil as this would be interfering with human free will.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are some positives of Augustine’s theodicy?

A
  • It fits with our experience of the world; free will often leads to suffering.
  • Natural evil may be only evil because of the way we perceive it. Are animals killing other animals out of necessity evil?
17
Q

What are some negatives of Augustine’s theodicy?

A
  • The idea of sin being transferred to us from Adam and Eve seems unjust. Why are we being punished for actions we did not take?
  • Requires a literal understanding of Genesis
  • How could everything be made perfect, but then go wrong?
  • Some may argue the omission of not stopping evil is as bad as creating it
18
Q

What is the analogy of the picture?

A
  • In the same way that good use of shadows improve a picture, evil is too a necessary part of the natural balance of the universe.
  • A world with genuine free will and evil is better than a world with no evil but also no free will.
19
Q

What concept does McCabe support?

A

Privation
He suggests that what makes something ‘bad’ varies depending on the thing.

20
Q

What is the concept of privation?

A

God does not create evil, but rather not create good in some places.

21
Q

What did Aquinas suggest about natural evil?

A

Natural evil may only be evil due to the way we perceive it.
For example, to us a cat killing a mouse to eat may be evil, but to the cat it is just acting according to its nature

22
Q

Explain the criticism of Augustine’s theodicy from evolution

A

It requires a literal interpretation of Genesis that isn’t always accepted by Christians today.
Evolution suggests we are moving towards perfection, but Augustine suggests we are moving away from it.

23
Q

Explain Hick’s theodicy

A
  • We are made in God’s image, but must develop into his likeliness
  • We can only truly do this with free will, and if God stopped evil we would not have free will, so he separates himself from us (epistemic distance)
  • We need to use suffering in this process. Our response to suffering develops our virtuous which make us closer to God.
  • Suffering therefore exists in our world, but for the greater good
24
Q

How does Hick view hell?

A

A place people go to to develop their soul before entering heaven.

25
What is the epistemic distance?
Hick: The separation between God and humans in order to allow our actions to be truly free. God makes it so his existence is not certain so belief in him is our choice.
26
How does the epistemic distance allow us to act?
Truly freely, as if we were certain of God’s reality we would act morally out of fear, not for the sake of acting morally.
27
What are some positives of Hick’s theology?
- Evil is presented as a tool for God, not as a flaw. - Allows for a non literal reading of Genesis - Recognises Jesus’ suffering as the reason why we can go to heaven - Recognises virtues are not just given, but developed.
28
What are some negatives of Hick’s theodicy?
- Why is the epistemic gap so big? Why is the suffering so extreme, especially for innocent people? - Hick’s theodicy does not take into account animal suffering which could be argued to be worse than humans - Hick does not explain the imbalance of suffering and why some suffer more than others.
29
What are Irenaean's two stages of creation for humans beings?
-Image: humans are created in the image of God -Likeness: at birth, humans begin to grow into the likeness of God through interactions with suffering
30
How does Swinburne develop Hick's/Irenaean's theodicy?
He demonstrates that moral virtues are only necessary in a world with suffering
31
According to John Hick, if God stopped suffering and evil what would he be doing?
Impeding on our free will.
32
Why is the epistemic distance necessary according to John Hick?
To make God's existence certain so that we have the choice to believe in him. Otherwise, we would only act morally out of fear and not for the sake of being moral people.
33
What are some criticisms of the Irenaean theodicy?
- Suffering is not the only way to grow morally. - Why is it moral for God to do something bad that leads to good, and not us? - Not all suffering will result in moral growth. - It does not seem fair. If everyone will go to heaven eventually, what is the point of being moral in this world if there is no real punishment for not?