The State and State formation Flashcards
(37 cards)
Neoclassical Theory of economics
A theory of rational choice
Public choice theory
This is the idea of economics being applied to politics. That is, applying neoclassical economics to understand the functioning of politics
Property rights
Property rights are important to the state (in contract theory) because they serve as a means of regulating or limiting societal activities in order for the state to serve as a wealth maximizer for society i.e. achieve economic growth. The way this can be done is through property rights. However, in the predatory theory of the state property rights are important because they maximize the revenue of a very specific group or class in society that controls the state.
A state
An organization with a comparative advantage in violence, extending over a geographic area whose boundaries are determined by its power to tax constituents.
Contract theory of the state
This is the idea that the state places the role of a wealth maximizer for society. This idea of maximizing societal wealth manifests as economic growth, and in order to induce economic growth, you have to limit the activities and behaviors of individuals relative to others. To achieve this sort of societal stability requires contracts. This theory specifically explains why contracting initially is really important but does not explain maximizing behavior of individuals with diverse interests.
Predatory theory of the state (Marxist)
This is the idea that the state is an agency of a specific group or class in society and its main function is to extract income from the rest of its constituents in the interest of that very specific group of people. So in a predatory theory of the state, property rights are meant to maximize the revenue of that specific group or class in power, regardless of its impact on the wealth of the society as a whole. The theory ignores initial gains of contracting and focuses on the extraction of rents from individuals by groups who gain control of the state.
Distribution of violence potential
What makes contract theory and predatory theory of the state similar is the distribution of violence potential; where contract theory assumes an equal distribution of violence potential amongst individual in power and predatory theory assumes an unequal distribution.
North’s neoclassical theory of the state
To understand the state north says we need to understand three characteristics of the state. The first is that a state trades protection and justice for private property in exchange for revenue from its constituents. The second is that the state will try and act like a discriminating monopolist. The third is that the state is constrained by the opportunity cost (the cost of an outside opportunity) of its constituents. That is, there are rivals external to the state that can provide justice and protection to constituents and this is what checks the state and makes them credibly commit to providing justice and protection, because if they don’t they won’t be able to extract revenue from constituents and maximize societal wealth.
Economies of scale
In North’s neoclassical theory of the state, because there are economies of scale in organization within a state providing justice and protection to its constituents versus each individual protecting their own property, total income in a society will increase, which is in line with what a wealth-or utility-maximizing ruler desires.
Discriminating monopolist
This is the idea that in North’s neoclassical theory of the state, a state will try and separate groups of constituents and create property rights schemes for each so that they can maximize state revenue. This is, property rights will look different for each group in society and the uniqueness of the property rights will allow for the state to maximize revenue as best it can from each group.
Degree of monopoly power
This is the idea that in North’s neoclassical theory of the state, the state is constrained in its behavior by the opportunity cost of its constituents by external rivals who can provide justice and protection of expropriation, so the ability for the state to be a monopoly requires that the provisions offered to constituents by rivals be weak in their ability to substitutes the state.
Contractual rules of the game
In North’s theory of the state, the state provides justice and protection over property rights of its constituents, but this needs to be established either unwritten (feudal manor) or as a written constitution. What these unwritten and written rules do is specify cooperation and competition which provides a structure for property rights. That is, who owns factor and product markets for maximizing rents accruing to the ruler, and how do we reduce transaction costs in order to get more taxes for the state for those who are maximizing rent.
The fundamental dichotomy of the state
North contends that the cause of the failure of society to experience sustained economic growth is the tension between the ownership structure which maximizes rents to the ruler (and his group) and an efficient system that reduces transaction costs and encourages economic growth.
Utility function of the ruler and agents of the ruler
This is the idea that in order to enforce property rights a ruler needs to create infrastructure to do this. This, however, requires that the ruler delegate some power to agents of the ruler. The ruler and the agents do not have the same utility function with regard to how property rights should be designed and as such because of the incongruence, monopoly rents will be lost by the state.
Supply curve of protection
This is the idea that it is expected that the ruler and the constituents enter a contractual agreement where the ruler provides protection and justice and the constituents provide revenue. However, the shape of the supply curve of protection plays a role in if the ruler is able to do this. That is, if the supply curve is u-shaped, that is as you increase protection it gets more costly to do so, the state will not be able to uphold its end of the bargain and as such rivals (other states, individuals, groups) serve as substitutes for the states protection and there again is a loss of revenue that should be the states.
Military technology
In the neoclassical theory of the state, this is what determines the supply curve of the protection. That is, if you have updated military technologies or if you don’t.
Competitive constraint and transaction cost constraint of the ruler
In the neoclassical theory of the state gives rise to two constraints on the ruler, where the competitive constraint will mean the ruler will avoid offending powerful constituents who could potentially be rivals of the state in terms of providing protection and justice; and the transaction cost constraint means that because the ruler now has potential rivals he is going to structure property rights to favor these individuals, which will make them more efficient but also make transaction costs of monitoring, metering, and collecting taxes) much more difficult because there will be more individuals to monitor. It is these two constraints that will cause wide spread inefficient property rights.
Inefficient property rights
Inefficient property rights are important in the neoclassical theory of the state because they threaten the survival of the state
A State
is a human community that successfully claims the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory and is considered the sole source of the right to use violence (legitimate violence). A modern State is a compulsory association which organizes domination, by expropriating the functionaries of estates who formerly controlled these means in their own right.
Politics
Striving to share power or striving to influence the distribution of power among states or among groups within a state
Legitimations of domination
This is basically the idea that individuals obey rulers for different reasons. Weber gives three justifications as to why individuals will obey: traditional legitimacy, charismatic legitimacy, and legal legitimacy
Charismatic legitimacy
this is the idea that a ruler is seen as legitimate because they are a good leader so they are heroic or charismatic. So people are keen on obeying a leader not because it is tradition or because legally they have to, but they do so because they actually just believe what the ruler is saying.
Legal legitimacy
This is legitimacy based off of rules that are created by institutions. That is, as an individual who exists in a State you are under the rule of an individual based off of laws
Legitimate power
The idea of legitimate power is that rulers are able to maintain their domination over individuals, because they control the material goods that are necessary for the use of physical violence. These resources are specially the personal executive staff and the material implements of administration. That is, the bureaucracy.