The Supreme Court Flashcards
(33 cards)
System of courts in India v/s the USA
India- Unified system of courts- single hierarchy of courts from SC to district
US- double system-federal and state courts
SC of India inauguration and succeeded what
28th Jan 1950, succeeded the Federal Court created by the GOI Act 1935 but has wider powers since replaced British Privy Council as highest court of appeal
Part of constitution dealing with SC
Part V
Does the parliament have powers to affect the functioning of the SC?
Yes it can makes laws
How many judges in the SC currently and original strength?
34 (CJ+33). According to article 124 (CJ+7)
Article 124
Strength would be CJ+7 unless increased by Parliament which it has on numerous occasions.
How are judges appointed?
CJ- by president after consultation with other SC HC judges as they deem necessary. And for other judges, consultation with CJ and other SC HC judges as they deem necessary.
Controversy with judges appt-
SP Gupta/First judges case- consultation doesn’t mean concurrence, only exchange of views
SC Advocates on Record/Second Judges case-advice binding, CJ with 2 seniormost colleagues
Prez reference/third judges case-CJ should consult 4 seniormost and even if 2 don’t agree then decision not to be made
99th CAA, 2014 and National Judicial Appointments Commission Act appointment by National Judicial Appointments Commission
SC Advocates on Record/Fourth judges case- above void and unconstitutional
Controversy with CJ appt-
1950-1973 senior most judge
1973 AN Ray superseded 3 senior judges
1977 MU Beg superseded one senior judge
1993 second judges case- senior most judge should be CJI
Qualifications to be SC judge
- Citizen of India
- HC judge for 5 years/HC advocate for 10 years
- Eminent jurist acc to president
Salaries
Determined time to time by parliament and cannot be changed after appointment unless under financial emergency
Tenure of judges
No specific time period but certain provisions
1. Reach 65 years
2. Send resignation to pres
3. Removed by prez on recommendation of parliament
Removal of judges how?
President removes through order when he receives an address from the parliament is supported by special majority (majority of house and more than 2/3rd) by both houses
Procedure related to judges removal in SC
Judges enquiry act (1968) governs procedure
1. Motion signed by 100 LS/50 RS
2. speaker/chairman can admit or reject motion
3. If motion admitted, creation of 3 person panel by them made up of CJI/SC judge, CJI of a HC and eminent jurist
4. If found guilty by them-misbehaviour or incapacity-house can now consider motions
5. Spl majority needed, then precedent to prez who then issues order
No impeachments till date
Acting CJI
By president if seat vacant, not able to do or absent- judge of SC
Ad Hoc SC judges
By CJI after consulting HC CJ when there is lack of minimum strength i.e. quorum to hear cases judge from HC
Retired Judge
CJI after Prez and his consent-for a temporary period from HC?SC retire judges-would enjoy all SC judge powers but not deemed as actual SC judge
SC seat
The Constitution declares Delhi. Can be changed by CJI after consulting the President.
Procedure of Court
SC decided after consulting the President. constitutional cases and presidents opinion (article 143) by 5 judge bench while other by single judge/divisional benches. Majority opinion prevails but dissenting judgements can also be given.
Independence of the judiciary
- Appointment does not let executive or legislature get too powerful
- Service conditions cannot be varied
- Security of tenure- only on ground by pres which in terms need spl majority by both houses
- Expenses from consolidated fund non-votable by parl
- Conduct of judges cannot be discussed unless about removal
- No practice after retirement within india
- Power to punish for contempt
- Freedom to appoint own staff
- Jurisdiction cannot be reduced since provided by constitution
Jurisdiction of the SC
Original
Writ
Appellate
Advisory
Court of Record
Judicial Review
Review Jurisdiction
Constitutional interpretation
Other powers
Discuss the original jurisdiction of the SC
Federal court, adjudicates disputes between states, b/w centre and states or centre and states on one side and other states on the other. Original means it has exclusive powers to decide, without appeal. But excludes following- pol questions, complaint brought by individual citizen, disputes from treaty/covenant/sanad etc entered before coin of the constitution, inter-state water disputes (taken over by Inter-state river water disputes act), finance commission matters, adjustment of expenses/pensions b/w centre and states
Discuss the writ jurisdiction of the SC
Guarantor and defender of fundamental rights. Empowered to issue writs like habeas corpus, mandamus, certiorari, prohibition, quo warranto etc for enforcement of fundamental rights. Had original jurisdiction as individuals can directly approach it. But not exclusive as HC can also do that and has smaller range because HC can issue it for FR but also beyond that.
Discuss the appellate jurisdiction of the SC
Highest court of appeal after replacing the privy council, hears appeals from HC judgements. constitutional matters when HC certifies that it is a substantial question. Civil matters when HC certifies that it is a substantial question of general importance or that it needs to be decided by the SC (no more monetary threshold of 20k). Criminal matters when HC reverses acquittal and puts accuse to death/takes case from subordinate court and sentences to death/certifies that it should be decided on by SC (first two do not require certificate, but as a matter of right and come after Parl enlarged jurisdiction in 1970s, and if HC reverses conviction and acquits accused no powers to appeal in SC). By special leave where in extraordinary circumstances under discretion and not as matter or right at any stage and any type of case, the SC takes up case from another court or tribunal except military and court martial.