The Telelogical Argument Flashcards

(10 cards)

1
Q

Outline Aquinas’ analogy of the archer.

A
  • Everything in the universe has a purpose
  • This purpose must come about through some higher power (God)
  • Objects can only be aimed towards a goal (their telos) with the guidance of an intelligent being
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is meant by design qua purpose?

A

The universe has been designed for a specific purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Outline the watchmaker analogy.

A
  • If you came across a watch, you would assume it has been designed due to it’s complexity
  • We don’t need to see the watch being made and the watch doesn’t need to be perfect to infer design
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How does Hume criticise Paley’s analogy?

A
  • The universe is unique. We can’t assume it was designed as there was no one there to witness said design.
  • It may prove some powerful being, at best. Why wouldn’t it be the Islamic God?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why do Charles Darwin and Richard Dawkins reject the telelogical argument?

A
  • Evolution provides the most significant challenge to design. If we were designed perfectly - why do we need to adapt?
  • “Paley’s argument is made with passionate sincerity and is informed by the best biological scholarship of the day, but it is wrong, gloriously and utterly wrong” - Dawkins on the watchmaker analogy
  • DNA negates the need for God. Christians have failed to adapt to this, making wild claims that the word “Jesus” is embedded into DNA
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What alternative did Catholic Cardinal John Henry Newman provide to the telogical argument?

A
  • Evolution can be used as empirical evidence to support God’s existence
  • Evolution shows that God’s design is skillful.
  • Science and religion are compatible
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Why does Newman’s approach fail to provide a credible alternative to the design argument?

A

He commits a God of the gaps fallacy by claiming God started evolution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why do John Stewart Mill & John Mackie provide the most credible challenge to telology?

A
  • The world is not designed to any degree of perfection.
  • If the world was designed by God, God is inherently evil.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did Paley base his teleological argument on?

A

Observations of the natural world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why are Paley’s analogies weak and overall not credible?

A

Comparing man-made objects to the world is non sensical and unfair. Paley is grasping at straws.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly