The Trait Perspective Flashcards
Types vs traits
Types: you are a single ‘type’ of person (may be different main types and sub-types, but you can only be one)
Traits: you can be described as having varying amounts of several traits (eg extraversion, optimism, pessimism etc)
What are traits?
Distinguishing qualities or characteristics of a person
Dimension of personality used to categorise someone according to the degree to which they manifest a particular characteristic
Assumptions
Personality characteristics are relatively stable over time
Personality characteristics are stable across situations
Goals and features of the trait perspective
This perspective does not try to predict the behaviour of one person in a given situation
Goals are to describe behaviour typical of people at certain points along a trait continuum
Determine whether someone is high/low on a particular trait
Personality psychology, regardless of the particular perspective, used traits and trait measures
Gordon Allport (1897-1967)
First acknowledged trait theorist
Believed in the individuality and uniqueness of the person and that people have consistent personalities.
Acknowledged the limitations of the trait concept.
Accepted behaviour is influenced by a variety of of environmental factors and traits are not useful for predicting what a single person will do.
Believed our traits have physical components in our nervous systems.
Allport: personality measurement
Nomothetic approach: identified common personality traits. All people can be described along a single dimension of a trait.
When used, a person’s score on a trait is compared with the scores of other participants.
Idiographic approach: identifies the unique combination of traits that best accounts for the personality of a single individual.
Allport: different types of traits
Cardinal: single traits which may dominate a personality and heavily influence behaviour.
Central: those 5-10 traits which best describe someone’s personality
Secondary: not core to personality, less general applicability (unlike central traits), likes and dislikes
The essential trait approach
Many psychologists have tried to reduce the many traits to a few essential ones: Cattel: 16 traits Costa and McCrae: 5 traits Eysenck: 3 traits Murray: 27 'needs'
Raymond Cattel (1905-1998)
Interested in identifying the basic structure of personality
Found 4500 words to describe aspects of personality.
Narrowed these down (factor analysis) to 171 trait names
Identified 16 personality factors
Personality measurement: Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16 PF)
Cattel: sources of information about personality
Q-data: questionnaire data (eg self-report, personality questionnaires)
L-data: life data (information gathered about a persons life, such as school records)
T-data: test data (ie observational accounts, how people act when placed in lifelike situations)
The Big Five
5 superordinate traits well supported by a wide variety of research.
Not everyone agrees on the naming of these traits.
Commonly measured by ‘NEO-PIR’
Openness to experience
A willingness to consider new ideas, try new experiences.
Cultural appreciation
High scores associated with being imaginative, original, artistic, intellectual
Conscientiousness
How controlled and self-disciplined we are.
High scores associated with being dependable, organised, responsible
A good predictor of job success
Extraversion
High scores associated with being energetic, enthusiastic, sociable, dominant, risk-taking
Agreeableness
Prefer cooperation over competition. Less likely to have arguments.
High scores associated with being friendly, cooperative, trusting and warm, altruistic
Neuroticism
Emotional stability and personal adjustment.
High scores associated with being nervous, tense, moody, etc.
Cross-cultural applicability: the Big Five
Ashton and Lee (2007) found evidence for an honesty-humility dimension in non-English speaking cultures
The Big Five and the Workplace
Conscientiousness is the best predictor of workplace performance.
Agreeableness?
Issues: faking, response tendencies (social desirability), employee perceptions, assessment versus testing etc.
Eysenck’ Big Three Factors
- Extraversion
- Neuroticism
- Psychoticism (tendency towards psychopathology - which involves impulsivity and cruelty)
Henry Murray (1893-1988): Needs
Primary (viscerogenic) needs: eg food, water, air, sex, avoidance of pain
Secondary (psychogenic) needs (27): readiness to respond in a certain way under certain given circumstances. eg achievement, dominance, affiliation, nurturance, rejection
Needs are ordered in a hierarchical order depending on the strength of needs, differs from person to person
Personality measurement: Thematic Apperception Test (TAT)
Murray: Needs - Assumption
Behaviour is driven by an internal state of disequilibrium
Specific Needs: Murray
Need for power: a need for dominance (to influence or control others, to lead and direct etc). May be insecure, like to accumulate possessions.
Needs for affiliation: a need to form friendships, be part of groups and to win the affection of others (ie need to have friends and please them). Associated with being extroverted (seeking contact), consciousness (dependable), and agreeable (friendly).
Achievement Motivation: Murray
The desire to accomplish something difficult, to master, manipulate or organise, to overcome obstacles and attain a high standard to excel one’s self.
The need to attain a high standard and to be driven to succeed on tasks that are set out by society.
Implicit vs self-attributed achievement motivation
Implicit: we are not aware of it. Spontaneous actions.
Self-attributed (explicit): motive we can readily describe. Occurs when we have time to ponder achievement options and decisions