THE VOICE AND EYE GAZE Flashcards
(12 cards)
THE VOICE
intrapersonal-behaviour affects someone else
interpersonal- behaviour affects ourselves
THE VOICE: speech content (v) speech style(nv) speech tone(nv)
STYLE OF SPEECH
SPEECH RATE: speech rate varies with cognitive load
RESPONSE LENGTH: an indicator of deceprion detection
SPEECH LATENCY: how much time passes before responding to a conversation
longer latency=higher cognitive load
PAUSES: gaps in speech, can be filled/unfilled
SPEECH ERRORS:more speeches error occur with higher cog load
RECOGNISING VOICES
we recognise voices by focusing on AGE,GENDER & ETHNICITY
People are thought to be good at recognising anger and
sadness, but not happiness (Juslin & Laukka, 2003)
People are not good at recognising shame or guilt, often confusing this for sadness
People are sometimes good at recognising disgust and sometimes not
STUDY: RECOGNISING VOICES
Simon-Thomas, Keltner, Sauter, Sinicropi-Yao, & Abramson (2009) examined how well people could identify emotions from ‘vocal bursts’
10 speakers produced 5 sounds to depict a series of negative and positive emotions.
Participants were then asked to listen to sounds and match them with the correct emotion, for both positive (study 1) and negative (study 2) emotions.
RESULT: Participants were very good at recognise emotions just from these sounds
For both emotions, participants were better at recognising emotions from females.
INTERPERSONAL BENEFIT:
Our tone of voice can be used to emphasis certain parts of speech
Our voice can signal communicative intentions to others (as a social tool) (Owren, Rendall & Backorowski, 2003)
However, do we really intend to communicate information through speech style?
INTRAPERSONAL BENEFIT:
Some people like the sound of their own voice (!)
Laughter and crying can elicit internal reactions (Neuman & Strack, 2000)
However, are facial expressions a surrogate for these behaviours?
CONSIDERATION
here are some methodological problems with some of this research:
Ecological validity issues (Simon-Thomas et al, 2009; Pittom & Scherer, 1993; Kurod, Hujiwara, Oamura, Utsuki, 1979)
Voices are not as universal as facial expressions
Voices are not as easy to measure as facial expressions
There are limited practical benefits of studying tone of
EYE GAZE
In conversation, we spend a lot of
time focusing on the listener’s face
To comprehend detailed linguistic phonetic information from the mouth
To signal interest and engagement
As it is a ‘biologically inherent’ focal point
When communicating with someone live face-to-face, we typically spend around 90-95% of the time looking at the face (Gullberg & Holmqvist, 1999, 2006). (In comparison, gestures are rarely fixated in conversation.
MANIPULATING EYE GAZE
However, we can manipulate whether
some fixate a gesture:
Through deictic expressions (Streeck & Knapp, 1992)
When a gesture is suspended in mid-air (Kendon, 1980)
Performing a gesture outside ‘central space’ (McNeill, 1996)
Performing a speaker-fixated gesture (Gullberg & Kita, 2009)
McNeill differentiates between central space (a space bounded by the speaker’s shoulders, waist and torso) and peripheral space (outside this area)
FUNCTION OF EYE GAZE IN THINKING
Two main theories on why closing our eyes / looking away helps us to
think:
Cognitive Load Hypothesis (Glenberg, 2007)
It allows us to focus our cognitive resources on a task that would
otherwise be spent processing information in the environment
Modality-Specific Interference Hypothesis (Wagstaff et
al, 2004)
It allows us have a blank visual slate that we can use to visualise
information more clearly
If cognitive load is supported, eye closure will improve
memory for both visual and auditory information
If modality specific interference is supported, eye closure will
only improve visual information
CONT.
Compared the performance of participants on a visual/audio memory tasks with their eyes closed or when looking at a blank screen
4 Conditions: Eye closure, blank screen (control), visual distraction, audio distraction
If all that is needed to complete a verbal task is to ‘see nothing’, there should be no difference between eye closure and blank screen conditions
Which theory would this support?
However, if effects were observed between eye closure and blank screen, eye closure has additional benefits for cognitive load
Which theory would this support?
CONT.
People tend to look up when trying to remember something, or perform another cognitive task. Why do they do this? NLP (Neuro-linguistic Programming) suggests that looking up ‘engages’ the area of the brain required to process that information Other theories suggest that we do so simply to remove stimulus from the environment and focus our thinking
People tend to look away or close their eyes when asked to complete a
difficult task (Doherty-Sneddon & Phelps, 2005)
People do better on cognitive tasks when doing so (Wagstaff et al, 2004)
People do better in eyewitness interviews when doing so (Perfect,
Andrade & Eagan, 2011; Vredeveldt, Hitch & Baddeley, 2011)
In fact, People are now encouraged to this in eyewitness interviews
(Fisher & Gieselman, 1992)
Top-down fixation, bottoms-up fixation