Theft Flashcards

(41 cards)

1
Q

Definition, section and act

A

S.1 Theft act dishonest appropriation of property belonging to another with ITPD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

appropriation meaning and Section

A

S.3(1) - any assia prion of the rights of the owner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Lawrence

A

consent irrelevant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

morris v DPP

A

one right needed and often an unauthorised act (Roskil)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Gomez

A

faulty cheque case and ran off with goods

removal from shelves was appropriation and authorisation was irrelevant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v Hinks

A

no deception and is consent but was theft even though was gift

(due to fragility of V?)

criminal float free from civil

Beatson and Simister in response said every act coukd fulfil AR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Darroux

A

charity time sheet pay case

no appropriation as middle man jusy deception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v Briggs

A

appropriation included physical act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Atakpu

A

appropriation continues for so long as thief sensibly regarded as in act or on job

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R v Pitham and Hehl

A

offer to sell was appropriation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

S.3(2)

A

if bought stolen good and exercises right over it cannot be thief if bought in good faith

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Property definition

A

S.4(1) - money and any property including real, personal, intangible or things in action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Things in action cases

A

R v Kohn
R v Hillon
R v Darroux

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

S.4 (2)

A

can’t steal land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

R v Gimbert

A

D bought land for £1 from cousin and sold for £50,000 - not theft

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

S.4(3)

A

wild flowers can’t be stolen unless do so for commercial purposes

18
Q

S.4(4)

A

wild creatures can’t be stolen unless usually in captivity

19
Q

Oxford and Moss

A

can’t steal info

20
Q

Corpses cases

A

Kelly - corpses had work done so property

Yearworth - sperm is property

21
Q

Law v Blease

A

cannot steal electricity

22
Q

Belonging to another stat def

A

belonging to any person with possession or control over it

23
Q

cases for S.5(1) belong to another

A

R v Woodman
R v Turner no2
R (Ricketts)

24
Q

R v Woodman

A

V did not have to be aware of stolen property

25
R v turner no2
coukd steal own car
26
R (Ricketts)
theft to take things left outside charity shop for charity shop
27
S.5 (3)
an obligation to deal with something in a certain way must be followed or it will be theft
28
R v Hall
travel agent case - didn’t state specifically needed to spend on flights so not theft when spent on other things
29
R v Wain
fundraising for charity - not giving to charity would be theft
30
S.5.(4)
if transfer property mistakenly it jusy be given back
31
Dishonesty section + categories in that
S.2(1) a. belief has right to property in law b. belief has consent of V c. can’t find owner using R steps
32
Ghosh test
Old law 1. dishonest by ordinary standards of R and honest people 2.D realised action was dishonest according to these
33
Feely test
Jurors decide
34
Griew criticisms of Ghosh
confuses state of mind for dishonestly Q of law to Jury assumes common definition of dishonestly assumes jurors honest unsuitable in specialist cases
35
Ivey test and case set out in
Barton and Booth 1. actual state of knowledge as to facts 2. conduct dishonest by standards or ordinary people (objective and subjective)
36
issues with ivey test?
should COA follow SC obiter Finch - jury with no direction did best only answered some of Griews critique
37
ITPD section
S.6(1) - intention to treat thing as own to dispose of regardless of others rights
38
Lloyd case
worked at cinema and gave tape to friend borrowing not enough unless deprived of all goodness and value
39
S.6(2)
take and give to pawn shop with intent to come back but might not be able to is ITPD
40
DPP v Lavender
council house change doors case
41
R v Vinall
need ITPD at time of appropriation (bike theft case)