Theme 1: Flashcards
(46 cards)
Who was Germany ruled by before 1918
Until 1918 Germany was a monarchy under the king/ emperor who was known as the Kaiser
When was Germany united?
Germany had only been united in 1871.
What was the post-unification German state refered as
The new German state was known as the Second Reich and is sometimes referred to as imperial Germany.
What role did the Generals have in making Germany become a democracy at the end of WW1
During the war the government was run by the Kaiser’s generals. To strengthen Germany’s negotiating position and get a more favourable peace settlement, the Kaiser and the leading generals agreed to the creation of a government run by civilians headed by Prince Max of Baden. It was his government who would now negotiate Germany’s surrender.
This was a clever move by the generals because it meant that generals such as Ludendorff and Hindenburg wanted to avoid taking blame for defeat and they would later blame democratic politicians for the shameful surrender of 1918.
What was the “German Revolution” and what did it lead to
Another reason why the nature of government changed in 1918 was that there were widespread disturbances in Germany which some historians refer to as the ‘German Revolution’. There were terrible food shortages caused by an allied blockade of German ports which cut off food supplies. There were mutinies in some units of the armed forces. Most notably among sailors in the port of Kiel. Workers also formed revolutionary councils (like the Soviets being created by the Communists in Russia)
What were the terms of the Weimar Constitution
- Universal Suffrage: all adult citizens, male and female, had the right to vote
- The President (the Head of State) was to be elected every seven years by universal suffrage
- The President appointed the Chancellor (the equivalent of our Prime Minister)
- The Chancellor’s government would need to work with Reichstag to pass laws.
- Elections to the Reichstag were based on Proportional Representation (PR).
- Civil rights were guaranteed eg freedom of speech/ assembly
- Workers were guaranteed the right to work or social welfare if work was not available.
- The constitution created a federal system of government where individual German states would have a lot of power.
The states would send representatives to the Reichstrat, the second chamber of the parliament. - Article 48 gave the president extensive ‘emergency powers’. The president could suspend the constitution, including civil rights, and rule by decree for a limited period in a state of emergency.
What was the problem with PR in Weimar Germany
Some historians have criticised the Constitution, arguing that it contributed to weak government because of the system of Proportional Representation. This meant that even parties with s small share of the national vote got at least some representatives in the Reichstag, which meant that governments could only be formed by entering coalitions (alliance with other parties). These coalitions were weak and often broke up (there were 14 different Chancellors in Weimar Germany between 1918 and 1933 and 22 different coalition governments). Many Germans therefore associated Weimar democracy with a weak government.
What was the problem with Article 48 in Weimar Germany
Article 48 of the constitution, which allowed the President to suspend parliament and allow the Chancellor to govern by decree (basically he could do as he wished without having to get the approval of parliament) was dangerous because it could be used to undermine democracy.
How did the extensive powers of he president effect Weimar Germany
Another weakness was the powers that the constitution gave to the president. The liberals who wrote the constitution did so because they were highly influenced by the American system of government in which the president has a significant role to play and can rise above petty party interests in the legislature.
Hindenburg used Article 48 not to defend the Weimar Constitution, he used them to destroy it in the early 1930s as he allowed Chancellors from Bruning onwards to use emergency powers to govern. In 1933 he allowed the Nazis to rip up the Constitution by passing laws which went totally against its democratic spirit and guarantees of civil liberties. (Significantly, when the constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany was agreed in 1949, it reduced the powers of the presidency, and insisted that parties that did not reach a threshold of 5% of the national vote would not gain any seats in parliament).
What was the Socialist Party in Weimar Germany
SPD (Socialist Party) Supported mainly by working class Germans. One of its leaders was the first President of the Weimar Republic, Ebert. It was a moderate social democratic party, and was hostile to the Communist Party (KPD)
What was the Center Party in Weimar Germany
Zentrum (Centre Party) This was the party that represented German Catholics. It was right of centre on the political spectrum - it was socially conservative and felt uncomfortable with many of the social changes taking place in Germany e.g. feminism that it associated with Weimar democracy. It was very hostile to Communism because Communists hated religion.
What was the Democratic Party in Weimar Germany
DDP (Democratic Party) This was a liberal, middle class party.
What was the communist Party in Weimar Germany
KPD (Communist Party) This party wanted to overthrow the Weimar Republic and destroy the Capitalist system. However, it did elect members to the Reichstag who generally used parliament as a platform to attack the government and the capitalist ‘system’ which it associated with the Weimar Republic. In the early years of the Weimar Republic Communists had tried to overthrow the government, but without success. It had links to the USSR.
What was the moderate conservative party in Weimar Germany
DVP (Peoples’ Party) This was a moderate conservative party, just right of centre. One of its leaders was Gustav Stresemann, who was to become a leading figure in the Weimar Republic. In the early 1930s it moved to the right and a couple of its leaders became Chancellors who were opposed to democracy (Chancellors Bruning and Von Papen)
What was the Conservative Nationalist right wing party in Weimar Germany
DNVP (Nationalist Party) This was a conservative right wing party that was led by a newspaper baron called Alfred Hugenberg and represented industrialists and landowners. Though it joined some Weimar governments, like other parties, including the Centre Party and the DVP, it moved to the right in the late 1920s/ early 1930s.
What was the extreme Nationalist and anti-semitic party in Weimar Germany
NSDAP (National Socialist German Workers’ Party (Nazi) Party) This party was an extreme nationalist one and anti-semitic (anti-Jewish) party. It was strongly opposed to democracy and wanted to establish a dictatorship. It was led by Adolf Hitler. In 1923 it staged an attempt to overthrow the Weimar Republic, which failed. Hitler was briefly jailed, and he now decided to take power by winning votes; once he did, he was determined to use the power he had to destroy democracy.
What were the revolts that Weimar Republic was faced with
There were a series of revolts against the Weimar Republic. These included:
The Spartacist uprising (January 1919) by Communists
The Kapp Putsch (March 1920) by nationalists on the right, including the Freikorps
The Ruhr uprising (March 1920) by workers and Communists
The Munich Putsch (November 1923) by the Nazis
What other forms of political violence were present in 1919-24
In addition to the revolts, there were a wave of political assassinations, such as that of Walther Rathenau, the foreign minister. He was killed by right-wing extremists who accused the Jewish businessman of being part of a Jewish conspiracy to destroy Germany as he had agreed to the Treaty of Versailles.
How did nostalgia for ‘strong’ government of imperial Germany did to German distrust and hostility towards democracy in Weimar
Many people thought democracy gave too much political power to the ‘uneducated’ who were ill suited to have an influence on important national decisions. Many Germans were nostalgic for the ‘strong’ government of Kaiser and former Chancellors such as the 19th Century leader Otto von Bismarck. He represented the ‘strong man’ many Germans believed the country needed to deal with the problems created by defeat in 1918.
How did anger at the “natioal Humiltion” of WWI lead to distrust toward Weimar
Many Germans were also angry at what they considered to be Germany’s ‘national humiliation’ at the end of World War One. We have already seen that many believed that the German army had been ‘stabbed in the back’ by politicians. In Germany the army had always been highly respected and, as we have seen, during the war generals had a great influence on government. The army had unified Germany in 1871 after a series of military successes. Popular respect for the armed forces was reflected in the formation of groups such as the Navy League which had supported the Kaiser’s policy of building a navy to challenge the British navy. Many former soldiers (including Adlof Hitler, who had been a Corporal) were angered by the defeat and blamed the democratic politicians. This disgruntled ‘front generation’ wanted a return to the ‘spirit of 1914’ when the country had come together against its enemies, the destruction of democracy and the Treaty of Versailles. These ex-army officers formed groups such as the ‘Freikorps’ which in 1920 tried to take over the government.
Racist opposition in Weimar Germany
Other right wing ideas which were hostile to liberal democracy were also widespread in the 1920s. While the Weimar Constitution had guaranteed the right of all Germans from all ethnic backgrounds (Jews, for example, flourished in Weimar Germany), many Germans were deeply racist. Racist groups such as the Racial Hygiene Society campaigned for racist laws and persecution.
What social divisions made Weimar Germany less likely to succeed
Nationalists on the right of German politics (not all of whom were as extreme as Hitler) hated the left (communists and socialists).
Even the left was divided. Socialists feared violent revolution in Germany and so supported the suppression of the Communists. As a result, Socialists and Communists argued among themselves and did not work together in the 1930s to stop Hitler from coming to power.
There were also religious differences between Protestants and Catholics. Protestants tended to dominate the northern states of Germany, while the Catholics were more prevalent in the southern states.
What were the terms of the Treaty of Versailles
Loss of territory: Germany lost Alsace-Lorraine to France.
The Polish Corridor was created which gave the new state of Poland access to the sea. It cut Germany in two, separating East Prussia from the rest of Germany. It resulted in more than 1 million Germans coming under Polish control.
The port of Danzig was made a Free city under League of Nations control.
All coal production from the Saar (until 1935) was given to France. The Saar was put under the control of the League of Nations.
Loss of Empire: Germany’s colonies were placed under the control of the League of Nations, including German South-west Africa and German East Africa.
Reparations: Germany was forced to accept war guilt (Article 231) for starting the war and to pay reparations. These were fixed in 1921 at £6.6billion.
Loss of military: Germany had to disarm. Her army was reduced to 100,000 men. Germany was not allowed military aircraft or tanks. Her navy was limited to 6 battleships. The Rhineland, the area between France and Germany, was demilitarised.
Why did Germans view the Treaty of Versailles as dictated peace
Germans viewed the treaty as harsh since Germany had not been invaded and occupied at the end of the war. They expected to be involved in negotiations and their exclusion from the talks that led to the Treaty led to it being described as a ‘dictated peace’ or ‘diktat’ (ie forced on them against their will).