Theme 3 - Microeconomics Flashcards
(122 cards)
Sizes and types of firms
Reasons why some firms tend to remain small and why others
grow:
By growing, a firm will be able to experience economies of scale which helps them
to decrease their costs of production. They will also be able to sell more goods and therefore make more revenue. Together, these will help a firm to make a larger
profit: and many firms are motivated by profit.
● A larger firm will hold a greater share of their market. This will give them the ability to
influence prices and restrict the ability of other firms to enter the market,
helping them to make profits in the long run. Monopoly power often means firms have
monopsony power, and so will be able to reduce their costs by driving down the
prices of their raw materials.
● A larger firm will have more security as they will be able to build up assets and
cash which can be used in financial difficulties. Moreover, they are likely to sell abigger range of goods in more than one local/national market and so they will be
less affected by changes to individual products or places.
The principal agent problem:
In many large firms, there is separation of ownership and control:
In many large firms, there is separation of ownership and control:
● Firms are owned by their shareholders , who play no part in the day to day running
of the business.
● The chief executive and senior managers work for the company and control
day-to-day decision making.
● Shareholders are represented by a Board of Directors, who oversee the way the
business is run. They are able to vote directors onto and off the Board of Directors
at the AGM. However, this often makes little difference and shareholders have more
power through buying and selling shares : if share prices drop significantly, the
board may be encouraged to change their strategy.
The principal-agent problem
This separation causes problems due to the differing aims of the two stakeholders:
The owners will want to maximise the returns on their investment so will want to
short-run profit maximise.
● However, directors and managers are unlikely to want the same thing: as employees,
they will want to maximise their own benefits.
This is the principal-agent problem, where one group, the agent, makes decisions on
behalf of another group, the principal. In theory, the agent should maximise the benefits
for those they are looking after, but in practice, agents are tempted to
maximise their own benefits. For this reason, many firms are not run to
profit-maximise but to profit satisfice; a concept looked at in unit 3.2. The issue could be
overcome by giving managers shares in the business or linking their bonuses to profits, this
will mean that they personally will gain from higher profits.
An extreme example of this problem is the Enron Scandal (2001). The executives used
loopholes to hide billions of dollars in debt from the Board of Directors. The shareholders
filed a lawsuit to the firm and the executives when share prices fell from nearly $100 to less
than $1 in just over a year.
Private sector
refers to that part of the economy that is owned and run by
individuals or groups of individuals, including sole traders and PLCs.
Public sector
The public sector refers to that part of the economy which is owned or controlled by
local or central government. The purpose of these organisations is to provide a
service for UK citizens and profit-making is not their main aim, some may even make
a loss which is funded by the taxpayer.
Profit and not-for-profit organisations:
A profit organisation aims to maximise the financial benefit of its shareholders and
owners. The goal of the organisation is to earn maximum profits.
A not-for-profit organisation has a goal which aims to maximise social welfare. They
can make profits, but they cannot be used for anything apart from this goal and the
operation of the organisation.
Business growth
Organic growth-internal growth
Organic growth is where the firm grows by increasing its output, for example, increased investment or more labour. They may open new stores, increase their range of products etc. Almost all growth of firms is organic.
Advantages and Disadvantages ORGANIC GROWTH
Advantages:
● Integration is expensive, time-consuming and high-risk, with evidence suggesting
that the long-term share price of the company falls following integration. Firms often
pay too much for takeovers and integration is often poorly managed with many key
workers tending to leave after the change.
● The firm can keep control over its business.
Disadvantages:
● Sometimes another firm has a market or an asset which the company would be
unable to gain through organic growth. For example, integration would allow a
European company to expand into the Asian market which it has no expertise in.
● Organic growth may be too slow for directors who wish to maximise their salaries.
● It will be more difficult for firms to get new ideas.
Vertical integration
Vertical integration is the integration of firms in the same industry but at different stages
in the production process . If the merger takes the firm back towards the supplier of a
good, it is backwards integration. Forward integration is when the firm is moving towards
the eventual consumer of a good.
- Tesco’s £3.7bn takeover of Booker in 2018 is an example of vertical integration. It has led to
an increase in sales for Tesco.
Advantages of Forward and backward vertical integration
- There is increased potential for profit as the firm takes the potential profit from a larger part of the chain of production.
● There will be fewer risks as suppliers do not have to worry about buyers not buying their goods and buyers do not have to worry about suppliers not supplying the goods.
● With backward integration, businesses can control the quality of supplies and ensure delivery is reliable. Moreover, they don’t have to worry about being charged high prices for supplies, keeping costs low and allowing lower prices for consumers.
This can increase competitiveness and sales.
● Forward integration secures retail outlets and can restrict access to these outlets for
competitors.
Disadvantages of forward and backward integration
Firms may have no expertise in the industry they took over, for example, a car manufacturing company would have deep knowledge of car manufacturing but little knowledge of selling cars and vice versa.
Horizontal integration
this is where firms in the same industry at the same stage production integrate.
- In 2015, AstraZeneca acquired ZS Pharma for $2.7bn. It gave them access to new compounds and was a long term deal intended to strengthen a specific sector of their business. Other well-known examples are Currys PC Worlds and Arcadia, which own
Topshop, Evans, Dorothy Perkins etc.
Advantages of horizontal integration
This helps to reduce competition as a competitor is taken out and increases
market share, giving firms more power to influence markets.
● Firms will be able to specialise and rationalise, reducing the areas of the
businesses which are duplicated.
● The business can grow in a market where it already has expertise, which is more likely to make the merger successful.
Disadvantages of horizontal integration
The problem is that it will increase risk for the business as if that particular market fails, they have nothing to fall back on and will have invested a lot of money into that area. They are ‘placing all their eggs in one basket’.
Conglomerate integration:
This is where firms in different industries with no obvious connections integrate. They can sometimes be linked by common raw materials/technology/outlets.
adv and disadvantages of Conglomerate integration
It is useful for firms where there may be no room for growth in the present market.
● The range of products reduces the risk for firms and if a whole industry fails, they will still survive due to the other parts of the business.
● It will make it easier for each individual part of the business to expand than if they were on their own as finance can be easily obtained and managers can be transferred from company to company within the firm.
Disadvantages:
● The problem with this is that firms are going into markets in which they have no expertise. It can often be damaging for the business.
Constraints of business growth:
Size of the market: A market is limited to a certain size and so not all businesses are able to mass produce because their goods would not be bought by consumers. This can happen no matter how big the market is, and there will always be limits on growth. In particular, niche markets (specific products that few people want) and markets for luxury items or restricted prestige markets make it difficult for businesses to grow.
● Access to finance: Firms use two main ways to finance growth: retained profits and loans. If firms do not make enough profit or have to give out too much to shareholders, they will not be able to use retained profits to grow. Banks may be unwilling to lend firms money, particularly smaller businesses that they see as high risk. As a result, firms will be unable to grow as they can’t finance it.
● Owner objectives: Some owners may not want their business to grow any further as they are happy with their current profits and do not want the extra risk or work that comes with growth.
● Regulation: In some markets, the government may introduce regulation which prevents businesses from growing. For example, the UK government regulates the
number of pharmacies in a local area and an existing pharmacy can only expand by buying another company. Competition law, which prevents monopolies, can restrict growth as any merger which creates a company with more than a 25% market share
can be forbidden from taking place.
Demergers
A demerger is a business strategy in which a single business is broken into two or more components, either to operate on their own, to be sold or to be dissolved.
Reasons for demergers
Lack of synergies: This is when the different parts of the company have no real impact on each other and fail to make each other more efficient. Lack of synergy means managers are splitting their time between areas which are so different it could
lead to diseconomies of scale; firms may split in order to avoid these diseconomies.
● Value of the company/share price: Some companies demerge because the value of the separate parts of the company is worth more than the company combined. This is because some parts of the business are operating well and have potential to
grow but the overall value is brought down because of the lack of success or lack of potential for growth of other parts of the business. Financial markets talk about ‘creating value’ by splitting up companies like this.
● Focussed companies: Some people believe if the company and the management are more focussed on individual markets they become more efficient and successful, and make higher profits. Management has limited time and skills and they are
unable to spend the required time to make all areas of a huge diverse business successful. By focusing on one area, managers can improve their skills and knowledge and become more successful.
● They may also want to avoid attention from the competition authorities.
Impacts of demergers
Workers: Workers could gain or lose through a demerger. Separate firms may need their own managers and leaders so people can get a promotion. However, the goal of making the firm more efficient may result in job losses.
● Businesses: Concentrating on a smaller core business may enable it to be more efficient and concentration may lead to more innovation and surviving higher competition. However, the smaller size of the business could lead to a loss of economies of scale and reduce efficiency.
● Consumers: Again, consumers could gain or lose. They may gain from innovation and efficiency, leading to better products and cheaper prices . However, demerged firms may be less efficient through loss of economies of scale or raised prices/reduced quality or range of goods as they become motivated by profits.
Profit maximisation:
A firm’s profit is the difference between its total revenue (TR) and total costs (TC). A firm profit maximises when they are operating at the price and output which derives the greatest
profit. Profit maximisation occurs where marginal cost (MC) = marginal revenue (MR). In other words, each extra unit produced gives no extra loss or no extra revenue.
- Profits increase when MR > MC. Profits decrease when MC > MR
To short-run maximise, firms produce where MC=MR. If they produce less than this, then producing more will increase profit since MR would be higher than MC so they’re
making more in revenue than it costs to produce the good and so producing more would increase profit. If they produce more than this, they would be making a loss on the goods produced above the profit maximising point and so they should decrease production. The diagram shows that the firm will produce at P1Q1: the output is determined by where MC=MR and the price at this output is determined by the AR curve. Cost and revenue diagrams are looked at in more detail in the following units.
Some firms choose to profit maximise because:
It provides greater wages and dividends for entrepreneurs
- Retained profits are a cheap source of finance, which saves paying high interest rates on loans
- In the short run, the interests of the owners or shareholders are most important, since they aim to maximise their gain from the company.
- Some firms might profit maximise in the long run since consumers do not like rapid price changes in the short run, so this will provide a stable price and output
Revenue maximisation:
This occurs when MR = 0. In other words, each extra unit sold generates no extra revenue
Amazon follow an objective of revenue maximisation, with revenue nearing £120bn in 2015 but profit staying relatively stable. Their aim is to dominate the market.
To revenue maximise, firms would produce where MR=0, since if marginal revenue is above 0 producing more would increase revenue. This means they produce Q2P2, whilst profit maximisation would produce at Q1P1.
.Prices would be lower than when they are profit maximising since they are producing more.
Sales maximisation:
This is when the firm aims to sell as much of their goods and services as possible without making a loss. Not-for-profit organisations might work at this output and price. On a
diagram this is where average costs (AC) = average revenue (AR).
In order to sales maximise, the firm will want to get the highest level of sales possible without making a loss. They will want to ensure sufficient returns to keep the owners happy, so will aim for normal profits. As a result, they produce where AC=AR at P2Q2. Prices are lower
and output is higher than they would be under profit maximisation.
The problem with both sales maximisation and revenue maximisation is that it necessitates a fall in price , which other firms may copy and so there may be no or little increase in revenue
or sales: this is important in oligopoly. They also bring lower profits.