THEME 4 Flashcards

(143 cards)

1
Q

Globalisation

A

The growing interdependency and integration of countries both economically and socially

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Impacts of globalisation on consumers

A

More choice/quality of goods/services
Cheaper goods/services
More job opportunities
Enrichment
BUT
Exploitation of labour
Western job losses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Impacts of globalisation on producers

A

Producers in saturated markets can expand to untapped markets
Cheaper labour/other factors of production (offshoring)
Better labour
BUT
Small, local firms get outcompeted
Difficult to control/diseconomies of scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Impacts of globalisation on the government

A

PUTS PACOS

Less poverty in the world
Less unemployment
More tax revenue
More social cohesion between countries
BUT
Pollution
Tax avoidance by MNCs
Culture loss
Overdependence on exports/imports
Spread of economic shocks e.g. 2008

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Factors contributing to globalisation

A

Improvements in Transportation (cheaper to move abroad –> global/domestic markets closer in price)
Improvements in Tech/Communications (e-commerce; cheaper international calls)
Reduction of Trade Barriers; Trading Blocs (less protectionism; EU/NAFTA/APEC etc. –> economies of scale…)
Deregulation of markets and increased capital mobility
Increased significance of MNCs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Phillips Curve

A

A curve that shows the short-run trade-off between inflation and unemployment

Low U –> shortage of labour –> higher wage demands –> higher wage inflation

Draw diagram

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Stagflation

A

Inflation accompanied by stagnation in the rate of growth of output and an increase in unemployment in the economy; simultaneous increases in the inflation rate and the unemployment rate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Conflicts between objectives

A

BoP/Growth (Growth –> more consumption –> more imports [esp. if high mpm])
Inflation/Growth (Growth –> more spending/AD –> demand-pull inflation)
Distribution of Income/Growth (Growth –> assets more valuable –> rich gain more than poor)
Employment/Inflation (Phillips curve)
Environment/Growth (Growth –> more production –> more emissions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Absolute advantage

A

the ability to produce more of a given product using a given amount of resources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Comparative advantage

A

The ability to produce a good at a lower opportunity cost

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Advantages of specialisation and trade

A

Lower price
More choice
Larger markets/EoS
Higher economic growth and living standards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Disadvantages of specialisation and trade

A

STUDM

Poss trade deficit if domestic G&S are uncompetitive
Higher unemployment
Unbalanced development
Global monopolies get larger
Spread of economic shocks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Arguments for international trade

A

Increased access of producers to larger markets
International division of labour
Domestic producers more efficient due to foreign competition
More goods at lower prices
Technology spillover - developing countries can catch up

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Arguments against international trade

A

Can’t rely on foreign countries where national security is concerned e.g. food
Some industries forced out of business
Economies hurt by sudden changes in global demand

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Protectionism

A

The reduction of imports by a government through the imposition of high tariffs or quotas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Reasons for protectionism

A

Raise tax revenue
Protect infant industries
Protect geriatric industries
Protect employment
Retaliation
Protect strategic industries
Correct BoP disequilibrium
Protect the environment
Prevent dumping

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Costs of protectionism

A

Higher prices/less choice for consumers
Inefficient resource allocation (distorts comparative advantage)
Regressive effect on distribution of income (tariffs fall on food, clothes etc., which low income households spend a lot on)
Production inefficiencies due to less competition
Trade wars
Difficulty of removing barriers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Methods of trade barriers + effects

A

Tariffs (deadweight loss)
Quotas (prices rise; imports fall; domestic output rises; NO tax revenue; loss of business to some importers; revenue to remaining importers up)
Embargoes (domestic output up; prices rise)
Rules/Regulations (increased costs for importers)
Domestic subsidies (reduces costs for domestic producers)
Preferential procurement policies (eliminates competition)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Evaluation of protectionist methods

DREAD

A

DREAD

Deadweight welfare loss/producer & consumer surplus
Potential retaliation, regressive effects, inefficiencies etc.
Elasticity of D&S
Amount of the tariff
Ability of domestic firms to increase output

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Case against import controls

A

‘Second best’ way of controlling trade
Welfare loss for consumers
Higher costs too for importers of components/technology
World multiplier effects from reduction in trade
Threat of retaliation
Import controls cushions X-inefficiency - act as a barrier to entry
Bureaucratic cost of administering and enforcing import controls

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

International competitiveness

A

The ability to sell quality goods and services at competitive prices in foreign countries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Main measures of international competitiveness

A

Unit labour costs (ULC) - improves when wage costs fall, worker skills/education improves, workers become more productive
Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) from WEF
Real exchange rate
Terms of trade

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Factors determining international competitiveness

FIR SUITS

A

FIR SUITS

Labour flexibility
Innovation
Regulation
Labour skills
ULCs
Infrastructure
Tax regimes
Economic stability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Benefits of international competitiveness

A

Households: employment; wage growth; higher purchasing power
Firms: more FDI; higher demand; higher profit
Government: current account surplus; employment; fiscal improvement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Economic effects of a fall in competitiveness
Unemployment - fall in exports (depends on new export markets being found; elasticity of goods) Deterioration of BoP (but ER will adjust; does it really matter?) Fall in actual economic growth (depends on other AD components) Price levels fall Impact on investment
26
Balance of payments
Record of all UK financial transactions between the UK and other countries over a year Current account; capital account; financial account
27
Current Account
Trade in goods Trade in services Investment income Transfers
28
Capital account
Government investment grants; purchase and sale of patents; trade marks and land for foreign embassies; debt forgiveness; currency trading
29
Financial account
Portfolio investment (buying bonds and shares) and direct investment (buying land and factories)
30
Reasons for a BoP deficit
High value of sterling Cheap imports - changing comparative advantage Recession in EU/Rest of World Increased UK income - economic growth Poor quality/design/reliability/availability of UK goods - R&D gap Insufficient productive capacity from UK suppliers
31
Reasons for a BoP surplus
A world boom causing an increase in demand for UK exports A recession in the domestic economy causing a lower demand for imports Improved quality, design, reliability and availability of UK goods Weak pound making UK goods internationally competitive
32
2015 election - policies regarding international competitiveness
Need access to finance - hard for small/medium sized firm post-2008 Need access to expertise - R&D; Labour ideas implemented by the coalition - catapult centres which bring firms together to progress in the industry and target technological research All parties had similar innovation policies Differences: Labour wanted to increase corp tax; Tories wanted to keep it the same Too much emphasis on debt: interest payments cause profits to fall, making corp tax fall Crowdfunding, shares, venture capital etc. would be better for innovation Labour proposed a small business administration like in the USA Curcial for long-term prosperity (more investment, infrastructure, education)
33
Supply side policies to boost international competitiveness
Tax incentives for firms to increase R&D expenditure (May not invest though) Education & training (better skills/occupational mobility) (Time lag) Privatisation (may be inefficient; not much left to privatise) Public spending on infrastructure (opportunity cost; time lag; can they afford it?) Deregulation; lower corp tax (Unintended consequences) Lower benefits/income tax (hurts the poor)
34
Demand side policies to boost international competitiveness
Exchange rate policies (not a free economy) Control inflation; macroeconomic stability --> encourage investment; keep prices low (difficult)
35
Impacts of a Current Account deficit
Higher standard of living Better quality goods BUT Negative impact on AD and a fall in growth - long term if supply-side causes? (only if deficit is big; could be consequence of strong growth, so good)
36
Impacts of a Current Account surplus
Increase in international competitiveness Greater confidence in the UK economy Greater FDI Exporting producers benefit --> employment BUT Inflationary pressure because injections are high relative to leakages Increase in the value of the pound --> fall in international competitiveness Living standards may fall
37
Economic policies to reduce a trade gap
Cyclical element of the deficit tends to be self-correcting Lower ER improves the trade balance after a time lag, but this depends on the PED/PES for UK output
38
Marshall-Lerner condition
WIDEC only applies if PEDx + PEDm > 1
39
Causes of a Current Account deficit
Demand-side: Strong domestic growth, overseas recession, strong pound Supply-side: low productivity, low investment, high relative inflation, high labour costs, poor quality products
40
Policies to reduce a Current Account deficit
Expenditure-reduction and expenditure-switching Caused by high demand for imports: tighten fiscal and monetary policy BUT may conflict with other objectives e.g. growth; depends on multiplier and confidence Caused by price: protectionism BUT retaliation; WTO conflicts; imported inflation; X-inefficiency Caused by strong pound: depreciation BUT Marshall-Lerner; J curve; imported inflation; floating rate; retaliation Can use supply-side policies BUT time lag; no guarantee of success; expensive
41
J-curve
PED for imports/exports inelastic in the short run, so a depreciation leads to a worsening deficit until contracts expire etc.
42
Exchange rate
The rate at which one currency is converted into another
43
Factors determining the exchange rate
GESTIC FRIG Growth relative to other countries Exports of goods/services (X up --> D£ up --> ER up) Speculation or special factors such as political events Trade performance with other countries IR differentials (hot money flows) Central bank official buying and selling FDI inflows and outflows Relative inflation (low inflation implies stability) Imports of goods/services (M down --> D£ up --> ER up) Government finances (confidence)
44
Free floating exchange rate
Value determined purely by supply and demand Trade flows and capital flows affect the ER No target for ER and no central bank intervention Sterling floated since UK suspended ERM membership in 1992 Bank of England not intervened to influence ER since independence in 1997
45
Managed floating exchange rate
Value determined by market supply and demand Some market intervention Governments normally engage in managed floating if not part of a fixed ER system (pursued in the UK from 1973-1990)
46
Fully-fixed exchange rate
Pegged Countries can improve competitiveness by cutting costs below other countries, knowing ER will be stable Need large currency reserves to make this work
47
Benefits of a floating currency
Low need for foreign currency reserves Freedom to set policy IR to meet domestic objectives May help prevent imported inflation Insulates an economy after an external shock, especially if export-dependent Partial automatic correction for a current account deficit Less risk of speculative attack
48
Benefits of a fixed currency
Certainty --> confidence for inward investment Low costs of currency hedging for businesses Stability helps control inflation Can lead to lower borrowing costs (lower yields on bonds) Imposes responsibility on government policies Less speculation if the fixed ER is credible
49
Benefits of a strong currency
Lower import prices - higher living standards Higher real purchasing power overseas Cheaper raw materials --> SRAS up Helps control inflation (tough competition for domestic producers; fall in imported input costs)
50
Costs of a strong currency
Cheaper imports leads to rising import penetration and larger trade deficit UK exporters lose price competitiveness and global market share - difficult to recover Damages profits/employment in sectors such as manufacturing Negative impact on growth in the medium term Some regions affected more than others - different export dependency; exposure to import competition
51
Reasons for public expenditure
Efficiency and market failure: some markets (e.g. public goods) are allocatively inefficient. Others productively inefficient - a monopsony (e.g. NHS) can fix that Equity and equality: certain goods have unequal burdens e.g. healthcare for elderly; education for poor Macroeconomic management: Free market doesn't account for externalities
52
Reasons for changing size/composition of public expenditure
Income elastic (low income less revenue; high income high demand for more/better services) Ideology (USA spends 38% GDP; Finland 58%) Population (ageing e.g. Japan less productive; need more spending) Economic crises (austerity post-2008)
53
Current and capital expenditure and transfer payments
Capital expenditure: spending on long-term investment goods (infrastructure) Current expenditure: government consumption + transfer payments + debt interest Transfer payments: mainly welfare, not included in GDP because there is no corresponding output A current expenditure deficit is undesirable because the burden of borrowing will fall on future generations
54
Can government spending improve living standards and equality?
Government efficiency: with the right controls/incentives, govt can be allocatively, productively and dynamically efficient. However, no profit motive Disincentive effects: high tax/spend discourages work, so should be small. However, Nordic countries have similar activity rates/growth as UK/USA Utility: principal-agent problem between politicians and taxpayers. However, this is because taxpayers would not make decisions in their best interests (public goods)
55
Crowding out
If an economy is operating on its PPF curve, an increase in public spending will crowd out the private sector Even below full employment, govt borrowing money to spend can lead to financial crowding out - higher D for finance --> higher IR --> less borrowing by firms to invest May not happen: transfer payments don't increase output; high U leads to crowding in (multiplier); could lead to growth, shifting PPF outwards, allowing for private sector growth Free market economics disagree: higher tax is discouraging; low multiplier --> crowding in unlikely; public investment inefficient
56
Advantages of government borrowing
Spending on public services benefits people. Education is a supply side policy, increasing economic growth Extra G increases GDP --> more tax revenue Improvements in living standards
57
Disadvantages of government borrowing
STOIC Spending cuts to reduce the deficit Increase tax to repay the debt - unpopular and reduce consumption Opportunity cost of higher interest repayments Danger of inflation Potential 'crowding out' effect
58
Composition of govt spending
Current spending on goods & services Capital spending Transfer spending Interest on debt repayments
59
Reasons for government spending
Provision of public and merit goods Redistribution of income and wealth Influencing regional resource allocation and industrial efficiency (done via regional policy) Influencing the level of economic activity
60
Macro benefits of state spending
AD injection into the circular flow Boosts AD during slowdown Regional employment increases due to investment Improvements in LRAS from better national infrastructure/education/healthcare
61
Micro benefits of state spending
A PIPE Wider access to public/merit goods - living standards, econ. welfare up Improved public service funding Income inequality down if real value of welfare benefits rises Relative poverty down if benefits low income families Externality effects e.g. from better public transport and healthcare
62
Factors influencing the size and pattern of govt spending
Level of GDP (more revenue; less demand) Size and age distribution of population (higher pop. --> more pressure on services; ageing pop?) Political priorities Redistribution of income Need for discretionary fiscal policy e.g. post-2008 Debt interest
63
Hypothecated tax
A tax that is raised for a specific purpose
64
Pigouvian tax
Tax to correct a negative externality (internalise it)
65
Stealth tax
A new tax/tax rise introduced in a way that is difficult to notice it
66
Fiscal drag
When tax allowances do not rise in line with prices and incomes
67
Effect of an increase in income tax
Fairer income distribution Lower incentive to work Less economic activity More tax revenue (Laffer curve)
68
Effect of an increase in VAT
Worse income distribution Greater incentive to work - need to Tax revenue depends on elasticity Inflationary wage-price spiral Leakage --> less economic activity
69
Absolute poverty
An absence of sufficient income to access basic human needs Poverty line $1.90 a day (~800mn people) Objective measure Same standard across different locations/time periods However, minimum level of income to meet basic needs varies by time and location
70
Relative poverty
Lower standard of living than those around you EU measure: below 60% median income Allows comparison within a country However, highly subjective; can change over time; can't compare between countries; doesn't take needs into account (pensioners have low income but low needs - mortgage paid off)
71
Composite measures of poverty
HPI-1 (% not expected to reach 40; % that are illiterate; % of illiterate children; % that don't have access to safe water and healthcare) HPI-2 (Probability at birth of not surviving to 60; Adult literacy rate; population in relative poverty; rate of long-term unemployment)
72
Lorenz curve
Graph showing how much the actual distribution of income differs from an equal distribution
73
Gini Coefficient
Measure of inequality on a Lorenz curve. Higher = less equal A/(A+B)
74
Causes of inequality
AUSPICATE Access to capital to start businesses Unemployment Social benefits Pay differences Inheritance Corruption Assets Tax system Education
75
Consequences of inequality SASHI
SASHI Social consequences e.g. high crime rate Access to capital - low for poor Savings low (poor) High poverty Imports (rich)
76
Interventionist policies to reduce inequality MITSC
MITSC Minimum wage - MW £7.70; LW £8.21 - boosts work incentives/take-home pay BUT might cost jobs; higher prices Income tax - 45% might rise to 50% - progressive tax reduces inequality BUT risks brain drain/tax avoidance Training - apprenticeship levy since 2017 - Helps raise productivity, jobs and real wages BUT time lag; free rider problem (?) Service provision - NHS, state education - Access to merit goods not based on ability to pay BUT universal access less effective than targeted provision Child care - £2,000 a year per child - improve incentives for mothers to work BUT quality of child care needs improving
77
Causes of poverty in the UK
WASSUP P Wages (low for unskilled/casual work) Age (elderly have no income; imperfect information --> low pension investment; health) Sickness & disability (can't work as much; unemployable) Social stigma around benefits --> might not claim; paperwork Unemployment (long term --> unemployable) Poverty trap (disincentive to look for work; job --> tax) Parenthood (alone: leave child alone or no income)
78
Causes of poverty in developing countries
Natural: Floods, famines, volcanoes, earthquakes, tornadoes, drought, inaccessible location, few natural resources etc. Manmade: GOBEFACEUP - Govt policies; Overpopulation; Barriers to trade; Environmental degradation; Forced migration; Advice from IMF bad; Corruption; Exploitation; Unemployment; Political strife
79
Consequences of poverty
Physical/mental health issues Lower life expectancy Bad education/less likely to stay in education
80
Causes of change in absolute and relative poverty
GDP rises reduces absolute poverty, but often hurts relative poverty (depends on welfare state etc.) Relative changes because of market force impacts on wages and wealth; changes in benefits and tax levels
81
Relationships between causes of poverty
Debt/Unfair trade: unfair trade means LEDCs can never pay their debts off Debt/War: must borrow to buy weapons Disease/War: war creates dirty conditions and lack of stability for healthcare, making disease spread Education/War: schools become dangerous; learning becomes difficult; kids at war Education/status of women: Women don't get education, so they can't contribute to the economy
82
Economic development
Cannot be defined precisely Takes into account the quality of growth, not just the quantity (living standards; sustainability; freedom of choices)
83
Indicators of a developed country
Can satisfy basic human needs Opportunity to raise standard of living Freedom to make choices Growth is sustainable
84
Indicators of a developing country
Focus on individual survival Basic human needs barely met Poor healthcare and sanitation Low levels of education Gender inequalities Poor and unstable governance
85
Indicators of development
Real GDP Income equality HDI (education, life expectancy, income etc.) Access to clean water, internet; size of tertiary sector HPI? (life expectancy, wellbeing, ecological footprint)
86
What is HDI?
UN measure of development that attempts to rank all countries. The goals of development considered are standard of living (GDP per capita); Longevity (life expectancy); knowledge (adult literacy/enrollment in primary, secondary and tertiary education)
87
Advantages/disadvantages of HDI
Reliable/easy to obtain indicators Takes income into account, but qualified by cost of living Figures recorded with consistency With GDP and HDI, assumptions on healthcare and education can be made Can judge success of govt policies BUT Fails to take into account income equality Large disparities may exist between regions, genders or ethnicities Life expectancy doesn't tell us about quality of life Knowledge is academic only - practical knowledge? Omits important factors e.g. democratic freedom, HR abuses
88
Human capital
The knowledge and skills embodied in individuals that facilitate the creation of personal, social and economic wellbeing
89
Importance of high quality human capital
AT BAT Attractive to MNCs because of lower costs in training workers Training --> greater productivity Basic needs of the economy met e.g. lorry drivers being able to read Adaptable economy if flexible Technological change contributions
90
Constraints on human capital improvement
Government can't afford education investment Families too poor to send children to school Culture e.g. lack of education for girls AIDS/HIV (parents leave work, so children leave school; teachers leave work; MNCs pull out due to unprofitability)
91
Weaknesses of human capital investment
Very expensive Long run nature of the investment (ILO: hard focus on education would cause "a protracted period, approximately 15 years, of net costs") Brain drain
92
Primary Product Dependency with examples
When a country is dependent on a single finite commodity Most developing countries concentrate production on the primary sector (SSA: 95% of exports are primary products) Can be hard commodities (copper, tin, iron ore) or soft (wheat, palm oil, rice, fruit) 2010 % of exports: Angola: 97% oil Zambia: 84% copper Tanzania: 37% gold Ghana: 39% gold, 26% oil, 17% cocoa
93
Issues with Primary Product Dependency
P-P-P-P-PEN Price fluctuations Price naturally falls (supply naturally increases; demand falls as synthetic materials can be used) Producer incomes and foreign exchange earnings fluctuate Planning investment is difficult (uncertainty) Protectionism can destroy an economy Elasticity (Income inelastic products - Prebisch Singer) Natural disasters can cause quick jolts
94
Evaluation of PPD
Some countries have developed on the basis of their primary products e.g. UAE (when price is high, they can make a lot of money and reinvest it in diversification) Some countries have natural resources with growing demand e.g. Congolese cobalt used in phones/electric cars Comparative advantage Food prices likely to rise because world population is rising, so demand for agricultural products rises, benefiting farmers
95
Prebisch-Singer Hypothesis
The argument that countries exporting primary commodities will face declining terms of trade in the long run due to primary goods being income inelastic, which will trap them in a low level of development as more and more exports will need to be sold to 'pay for' the same volume of imports of secondary sector or capital goods.
96
Terms of Trade
(Export prices/Import prices)*100 Ratio between the price of goods a country exports compared to those it imports Countries export certain goods and need those earnings to fund imports If ToT improves, the country can buy more imports with money from exports, and vice versa Depends on elasticity (Elastic exports: ToT improves --> XD falls --> revenue falls)
97
Thomas Malthus
Eighteenth-century English intellectual who warned that population growth threatened future generations because, in his view, population growth would always outstrip increases in agricultural production.
98
Problems with population growth
GFUCW GDP per capita falls Food Unemployment rises Crime rates rise Wages fall
99
Benefits of population growth
Higher output Cheap labour attracts FDI Higher tax revenues
100
Infrastructure and issues if it's low quality
Transport - inability to transfer goods reduces trade; may reduce chances of kids getting to school; high supply costs and delays for businesses; reduces mobility of labour Public utilities - power failures disrupt production; sanitation and clean water vital for good health Public services - need for effective emergency services and adequate schooling/healthcare Communications - inability to coordinate economic activity; underdeveloped radio/TV/internet makes communities insular
101
Impacts of bad infrastructure
Higher supply costs Delays for businesses Reduces labour mobility Need to invest more to deal with climate change (1901-1910 82 natural disasters; 2003-2012 >4,000)
102
Examples of bad infrastructure
India: Irrigation is bad, making food production hard to sustain, especially when there is little rain e.g. 2012 - farms had to draw more power to pump water, and hydroelectric plants had less supply, leading to a blackout which left >700mn people without power Brazil: 2011 - only 14% of roads were paved in 2011 SSA: combined power generation capacity of 48 countries is 68GW - about the same as Spain. 47 without South Africa: 28GW - about the same as Argentina. Africa only invests about 4% GDP into infrastructure
103
Corruption
Dishonest exploitation of power for personal gain
104
Types of corruption
Embezzlement, bribes, seizure of property, fraud, nepotism, spending on political aims e.g. weapons
105
Where corruption occurs
Govt not accountable Large-scale capital investment projects (payoffs unnoticed) Accounting practices poorly formulated Officials not well-paid Elections not well-controlled Weak legal structure Lack of freedom of speech
106
Effects of corruption
CAMEL PITS Cost of business rises Allocation of resources unfair Monetary gains may be moved out the country Environmental impacts Legal system ineffective Public funds wasted Investment falls due to risk of contracts not being honoured Trust in the economy falls Small bribes reduce citizens' economic wellbeing Just 5 of top-25 countries in the Corruption Perceptions Index are non-OECD
107
Poor governance
Government failure - rulers of a country adopt policies that result in the country's resources being allocated inefficiently, restricting growth
108
Connection of civil war to PPD
A country at 'peak danger', with commodities comprising 32% of GDP, has a 22% risk of falling into civil war in a given 5-year period, which a country with no primary commodity exports has a 1% risk. It is easy to capture and control the output of a gold mine or oil field compared to a sector of garment manufacturing or hospitality services.
109
Connection of civil war to human capital
Young males (majority of combatants) are less likely to join a rebellion if they are being educated and/or have a comfortable salary, and can reasonably assume that they will prosper in the future
110
Effects of political instability/conflict
Uncertainty --> potential economic breakdown Unlikely to receive FDI, or even aid Loss of life, damage to infrastructure, displacement of population, loss of investment/aid, impact on education, impact on healthcare etc. Examples: Sudan, Iraq, Rwanda, Somalia, Turkey...
111
Causes of debt
Legacy of colonialism (Indonesian independence in 1949 required assuming Dutch debt, much of it from fighting pro-independence rebels; Haiti paid 150mn francs for independence) Odious debt (civil wars in Guatemala, El Salvador, Colombia; apartheid regime in South Africa; Duvaliers in Haiti) - should be written off? 1973 oil crisis (LEDCs had to borrow, and banks funded by OPEC deposits lent. Much of the borrowing was odious. 1970-92: LEDC debt up 2000%) War Decisions to borrow for major investment projects when economy was strong; borrowing money speculating export prices would rise, and being wrong (Zambia); currency depreciation
112
Ability to finance debt
Japan debt $2.2tn, 42% GDP Liberia debt $3.2bn (606% GDP)
113
Problems with debt
SOURCE Servicing the debt Opportunity cost Unsustainable debt (not used to increase export earnings) Repayment ability Conditions on borrowing Expenditure on debt
114
Debt cancellation
Heavily Indebted Poor Countries Initiative 1996 Debt forgiveness if the country commits to 'good' policies for growth e.g. investing in people, free market practices, widening export base By end of 2009, 35/41 identified countries benefited; $130bn cancelled JUBILEE DEBT CAMPAIGN
115
Advantages of debt forgiveness
SPUD FARM Stability --> more FDI Poverty alleviated Unfair odious debt relieved Development of infrastructure/human capital Foreign exchange gap shrinks --> more investment Aid less needed in the future Rich countries benefit (exports) Mutual gains e.g. environment better looked after
116
Disadvantages of debt forgiveness
CAD GUM Corrupt misuse? Appropriate? May need conditions e.g. HIPC Dependency culture Govt policies needed as well to reduce poverty Unfair to countries that managed finances well Moral hazard
117
Policies to boost development
Inward looking (protectionism; subsidies; restrict MNC activity) e.g. USSR, India (ISI economics pre-1990) Outward looking (no protectionism; promote MNC activity; permit labour mobility; free trade; deregulation)
118
Benefits and costs of inward looking policies to boost development
Self-reliance; develop while preserving culture; necessary forerunner to international trade (infant industries); preserve traditional forms of life BUT Distorts comparative advantage; Lack of competition; higher prices; consumer surplus falls
119
Benefits and costs of outward looking policies to boost development
Welfare gains from tariff reduction; competition forces efficiency; benefit from world growth; EoS; qualify for World Bank aid BUT Infant industries can't develop; deregulation --> collusion; brain drain; no gains from MNC profit (repatriated); tax incentives for FDI --> low revenue
120
Interventionist approaches to development + criticisms
Import substitution; nationalisation; farmers forced to sell to the state at low prices; subsidies; over-valued exchange rates; encourage MNC activity BUT Slow growth; no profit motive --> inefficiency; govt failure; corruption?; fiscal deficit; BoP deficit
121
Free market approaches to development + criticisms
Trade liberalisation; market liberalisation; supply-side policies; SAPs BUT Asymmetric information; externalities; absence of property rights (tragedy of the commons); investment decisions
122
Aid
The voluntary transfer of resources from one country to another, or loans given on concessionary terms Bilateral, multilateral, NGO, tied aid, emergency aid
123
Advantages of aid
KID HARM Kick-start economic development Inequalities between countries shrink Develop infrastructure --> investment Human capital improvement Absolute poverty reduced Rebuilding disaster stricken areas Multiplier effect
124
Disadvantages of aid ACID PIC
ACID PIC Allocative inefficiency (distorts market forces) Crowding out of domestic investment Imperialistic uses through conditions Dependency culture Postpones economic restructuring Ineffective due to limited resources Corruption
125
Harrod-Domar model
A model of economic growth that emphasises the importance of savings and investment
126
FDI
The acquisition of non-financial assets of a country by foreign countries Involves a flow of capital to build a factory, buy a business, or buy land/buildings
127
Why are firms attracted to LEDCs?
Cheap labour/resources Low tax Subsidies Setting up inside a customs union Expanding market scope Weak regulation
128
Advantages of FDI
HER SPASM Develops human capital Provides employment Government revenues up Spillover effects e.g. copying tech Higher labour productivity --> higher wages than from local firms Access to world class tech and management Crucial source of investment funds to encourage savings (Harrod-Domar) Regional multiplier effects
129
Disadvantages of FDI
Flaws in job creation (not many jobs due to capital tech; expats for managers, leaving only low paying unskilled work for locals) Outcompetes local companies Exploits job-hungry workers Environmental risks taken Race to the bottom --> low tax revenue Repatriated profits Deals with repressive political regimes
130
Fair trade
Aims to reduce exploitation of producers, by giving them a 'fair price' for their product Workers from co-operatives to get better bargaining power with MNCs Businesses signing up to the 'fairtrade' label must treat workers well, take care of the envt etc. Pay a 'fair price' for the goods, plus a 'premium' to improve the product or the area e.g. schools Fairtrade Foundation gives these firms certification to alleviate a consumer's guilty conscience
131
Benefits of fair trade
Guarantees the farmer a certain income Protects farmers from price fluctuations Money can be spent on improving the product/production methods, increasing competitiveness Money can be invested into education, health, infrastructure etc. Farmers not subject to monopsony power from developed countries
132
Drawbacks of fair trade
Can be 'middle men' involved, reducing the benefit Not all farmers benefit (awareness, membership fees etc.) Market distortions - low price indicates oversupply Reduces incentives to improve quality/productivity Co-operatives discourage private enterprise Dependency trap
133
Alternatives to fair trade
Minimum price schemes Minimum wage Subsidy Regulation Unions
134
Buffer stock schemes
A situation where a government intervenes to stabilise prices, often in markets for commodities (raw materials) e.g. agriculture, buy setting ceiling and floor prices. They influence these by buying/selling the needed amount to shift prices
135
Criticisms of buffer stock schemes
Floor price too high --> constant surpluses Ceiling price too low --> insufficient stocks Costs of storage All major producers must cooperate; no cheating
136
Lewis model
A development approach which encourages the movement of labour from agriculture to industry (Marginal productivity in agriculture near 0 due to excess supply --> OC of moving = 0)
137
Criticisms of the Lewis model
Industrial profits may not be invested locally, especially if made by TNCs Reinvestment in capital equipment would hurt Assumption of surplus labour in agriculture is unfair e.g. favelas in South America
138
Financial sector
Connects lenders with borrowers through bond/stock markets, or intermediaries (commercial banks, investment banks, hedge funds, mutual funds etc.)
139
Market failure in the financial sector
When financial markets fail to allocate financial products at the socially optimum level of output. This is a misallocation of resources
140
Deregulation of financial markets
Lower reserve requirements (abolished in the UK in 1981); allowing commercial and investment banks to be joined, leading to a higher risk of bank failure
141
Causes of financial market failure
Excessive risk by banks Collusion to fix loan rates for self interest (LIBOR) Monopoly pricing
142
Types of financial market failure
SMEAR Speculation and market bubbles (Buy low, sell high; wrongly high predictions can create bubbles e.g. housing/bitcoin, which then bursts) Moral hazard - too big to fail Negative externalities e.g. cost to taxpayer of bailout (£27bn estimated); loss of savings; lost jobs, income and growth in the economy Asymmetric information (regulators don't know what banks are doing) Market rigging (LIBOR, FOREX)
143
Role of the central bank
Implement monetary policy Bank for the government Bank for commercial banks Regulate financial industry