Theoretical Approaches In L1 Acquisition Flashcards

(40 cards)

1
Q

Major theoretical approaches to L1 acquisition

A

Behaviourist
Linguistic
Interactionist -cognitive-constructivist, sociocultural or social constructivist, social interactionist, information processing-connectionnist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Structuralist

A

Commonalities, invariant processes
Language forms and structures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Functionalist

A

Prediction and control of verbal behaviour
Functions of forms, consequences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is competence?

A

Underlying knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is performance?

A

Actual behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Nativist

A

Emphasis on innate processes (innate ideas, Plato )

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Empiricist

A

Emphasis on environmental factors (blank slate, Aristotle)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Behaviourist approach

A

B.F. Skinner
Child viewed as a passive recipient
Language is verbal behaviour
Observable and measurable
Environmental role predominates (empiricist)
Vocab comprehension. (Classical conditioning )
Productive language, explained by operant conditioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Strengths/supporting evidence for the Behaviourist Approach

A

Attempt to explain complex process within context
Environmental input is critical
Shaping and reinforcement work to a certain extent in changing existing behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Limitations of the Behaviourist Approach

A

Little actual direct reinforcement
Syntactic/grammatical learning?
Infrequent beyond age two
Creativity?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Linguistic Approach

A

Language is unique
Language forms, structuralist, competence
Biological basis, nativist
Environment as trigger for dev
Universality to rules
Finite set of examples, language faculty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Innateness

A

Biological basis for language
Universality
Developmental similarities across children

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Supporting the Linguistic Approach

A

explanation for problem of language acquisition, input data insufficiently rich to allow acquisition unless UG
Creativity, learners produce forms not from the environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Limitations of the Linguistic Approach

A

No known principle does not necessarily mean it has to be innate
Negative evidence?
De-emphasis on environment too strong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Interactionist

A

Empiricist and nativist ideas
Basic mental structure imposes regularly on sensory information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Cognitive constructivism approach

A

Constructivism, humans generate knowledge and meaning from an interaction between their experiences and their ideas.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Piaget beliefs (cognitive constructivist approach)

A

Children and adults have different cognitive processes
´Méthode clinique ´ semi-structured interviewing
Children learn through action; schemas
Role of exploration
Language is not a separate faculty
Due to cognitive maturation
Language constrained by reason
Basic linguistic developments based in basic cognitive developments
Social nature of cognition
Active involvement with environment
Complex structures from interaction
Constructivist
Performance

18
Q

What is assimilation in adaptation (learning)?

A

New object incorporated into existing skill

19
Q

What is accommodation in adaptation (learning)?

20
Q

Sensorimotor stage (0-2 years) characteristics

A

(Understanding environment)
From reflexive to proactive behaviour
Ability to represent reality (e.g. object permanence)

21
Q

Preoperational stage (2-7 years) characteristics

A

(Understanding symbols)
Further dev of symbolic function, language, physical problem solving, categorization
Thinking categorized by irreversibility and egocentricity

22
Q

Sensorimotor stage (when)

23
Q

Preoperational stage (when)

24
Q

Concrete operations stage (when)

25
Concrete operations. (7-11 years) characteristics
(Mental tasks and language use) Thinking characterized by conversation and reversibility Logical thought relative to concrete or physical operations Categorization into hierarchical and serial categories
26
Formal operations (when)
11+ years
27
Formal operations (11+ years) characteristics
Abstracts thought, complex reasoning, flexibility Mental hypothesis testing
28
Strengths/supporting evidence for Piaget’s cognitive approach (constructivist)
Early linguistic attainments may correlate with nonlinguistic measures Means-ends schemes and language dev Important role of cognitive maturation
29
Limitations of Piaget’s cognitive approach (constructivist)
Correlation between cognitive and linguistic achievements perhaps not causal Only some cognitive abilities correlate with language dev Underestimation
30
Sociocultural and social-interactionist approaches characteristics
Interplay between linguistic, cognitive abilities and social and linguistic environment Language as communicative act Language environment and child, dynamic system Language functions central Child-caregiver unit Nature& nurture Performance
31
Vygotsky’s Socio-cultural approach
Social interaction plays important role Zone of proximal dev (ZPD) Scaffolding New concepts by interacting Learning = internalizing the language and actions of others Mechanism of social experience Emphasis: cognitive process from social interaction
32
JB Gleason is a …
Social interactionist
33
Paralinguistic Nature of CDS
Slower longer pauses between utterances Higher overall speech Exaggerated intonation and stress Fewer dysfluencies Fewer words per minute
34
What is CDS ?
Child directed speech
35
Lexical nature of CDS
More restricted vocab 3x as much paraphrasing More concrete references to here and now
36
Semantic nature of CDS
More limited range of functions More contextual support
37
Syntactic nature of CDS
Fewer run-on sentences Shorter, less complex sentences More well-formed s Fewer complex s More imperative s and questions
38
Children’s CDS preferences
Varied intonation Mother’s voice Most effective with 18-21 month old
39
Strengths/supporting evidence for socio-cultural approach & social interactionist approaches
Eclectic nature Emphasis on social interaction / social context Emphasis on CDS and interplay with child’s capabilities
40
Limitations of socio-cultural and social interactionist approaches
Untested assumptions Less emphasis on innate linguistic principles CDS not that simple Not found in all languages Lack of empirical support