Theory And Methods Flashcards
(37 cards)
Unstructured interview
Definition
Informal interviews, with no specific set questions. They have a freedom to vary questions and are able to ask follow up questions, like a conversation
Semi-structured interviews
Definition & sociologist
Lies inbetween the two extremes. Some questions may be preset where further questions can be asked if necessary
Sociologists like cicourel and kitsuse use this approach where they always followed up questions with ‘how do you mean?’
Structured interview
Definition
Formal interview with set questions that are closed and coded questions are used. The interview has to be asked the same way, same order by the interviewer
Group interviews
Definition & sociologist
A number of ppl interviewed together. They can include focus groups to discuss certain topics and record their views.
Paul Willis did this to research the ‘lads’ and schooling.
Unstructured interviews-
Practical strengths
Flexibility- this allows more valid results, with opportunity to probe deeper into areas of interest and explore new u familiar topics.
Exploring unfamiliar topics- the researcher doesn’t need to know much knowledge on the subject. It’s often use as a starting point to develop initial ideas.
Unstructured interviews-
Ethical strengths
Rapport and sensitivity- the interviewer can develop a rapport with the person being interviewed which puts them at ease and encourages them to open up
Unstructured interviews-
Ethical sociologist
Dobash and Dobash- used unstructured interviews to research domestic violence and found they built a rapport with interviewees who felt comfortable discussing personal issues
Unstructured interviews-
Theoretical strengths
Interviewers views- bc there’s no set questions the interviewee has more opportunity to speak about what they think is important allowing more valid data and new insights
Unstructured interviews-
Practical weaknesses
Time and cost
Training- interviewees need more training for the interviews as they need a background of sociology so they know what is imprtant
Unstructured interviews-
Ethical weaknesses
Harm- can ask distressing and intrusive questions as there’s no set questions, leading to more chance of this
Interpersonal relationship- researcher may become too friendly and may cross a professional boundary
Unstructured interviews-
Theoretical weaknesses
Representative- only use a small number of participants
Reliability- the interview can’t be reliable as they aren’t standardised, difference between respondents may reflect the difference in the interview
Quantification- hard for the data to be recorded
Structured interviews-
Practical advantages-
Quick and cheap- training interviewers is cheap as they are just reading the questions, and easily quantified results (easy to record)
Structured interviews-
Ethical advantages
Detachment- no issue as the results won’t be impacted by them building a relationship
Predetermined set questions- less risk of upsetting or imposing questions
Structured interviews-
Theoretical advantages
Response rate- quick, from a large number, can be generalised
Reliable- questions are asked in the same way, and same questions so research can be compared and replicated
Structured interviews-
Theoretical sociologist work
Young and willmott- approached 987 ppl in their study and only 54 refused an interview
Structured interviews-
Practical disadvantages
Inflexible- can’t ask follow up questions. Lack validity as it doesn’t get the participants concerns and priorities
Cost- have to get interviewers with good ppl skills
Structured interviews-
Ethical disadvantages
Not suitable for sensitive topics as can’t build a rapport
May feel like they have to answer a question
Structured interviews-
Theoretical disadvantages
Response rate- those who participate may be those who have more time and don’t work leading to unrepresentative data
Group interviews-
Practical advantages
Good way to get into tail ideas to look at later
Combine questioning with opportunity to observe group dynamics
Group interviews-
Ethical advantages
Feel more comfortable around peers and so they open up
Group interviews-
Theoretical advantages
Throws ideas around the group stimulating others ideas, creating more valid data
Group interviews-
Practical disadvantages
One or two ppl may dominate the discussion preventing others from voicing their opinions.
Data can be difficult to analyse
Group interviews-
Ethical disadvantages
Some may feel like they are unable to open up infront of others in fear of being judged if it’s a sensitive issue
Group interviews-
Theoretical disadvantages
Peer group pressure to conform to norms may effect validity