THEORY OF MIND Flashcards

1
Q

Thoughts are unobservable so…

A

We can’t access the content of someone’s mind t/f we actively seek to make sense of others’ behaviour by figuring out what someone is trying (or intending) to do, what they want and what they are thinking.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How do we figure out what someone is trying (or intending) to do

A
  1. We understand that other people are intentional agents - we do things because they want things to happen/they have a goal.
  2. Ability to take another person’s perspective (put yourself in their shoes)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How TOM develops

A

TOM generally tends to (according to research) develop around the age of 4 - this is because research using false belief tasks has found that 3 year olds fail to attribute false belief to another person/child whereas 4 year olds correctly realise that the other person would have false beliefs.

After age 4, their ability to use TOM develops…
- at age 5, children can use the idea of false beliefs to predict when a person will be surprised (HADWIN + PERNER, 1991) = attributing an emotion(s) to another person.
T/F, deception emerges around age 5 (PESKIN, 1992)

TOM does seem to be causally related to the ability to lie (DING et al., 2015)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why is TOM important to us

A

We live in a complex world + as humans we try and make our world more predictable (by trying to predict other people’s behaviour)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How do we reduce our complex world down to a simpler understanding

A

We observe others’ behaviour, attributing intentions, desires + beliefs and then use this as a basis for predicting what they might try to do next.

May even try to manipulate others’ behaviour using these same processes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How is TOM measured in children?

A

A crucial test of TOM is the ability to attribute false beliefs to others e.g. tooth fairy > adult vs. child

A standard false belief task:
> moving item from box that it was originally put in and asking where someone else may expect the item to be
> crucial test is whether children are able to attribute a false belief to the character.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How is TOM measured in children?

A

A crucial test of TOM is the ability to attribute false beliefs to others e.g. tooth fairy > adult vs. child

A standard false belief task:
> moving item from box that it was originally put in and asking where someone else may expect the item to be
> crucial test is whether children are able to attribute a false belief to the character.
WIMMER + PERNER (1983); FRITH (2003)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How we know/have been able to infer things about the development of TOM

A
Research on the false belief task 
e.g.1
The 'Sally-Anne' false belief task (FRITH, 2003)
- marbles - basket - 4 year olds pass, 3 year olds fail
ROBUST finding (even when scenarios, objects etc. are changed) - shows the difference in 3 to 4 year olds.

e.g.2
The Smarties Test (PERNER ET AL, 1987)
Keeping track of others’ beliefs, and your own.
- ‘what’s inside the smarties tube’ and what a friend will think is inside.
3 year olds fail, 4 year olds pass

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did Ding et al., 2015 specify that TOM seems to be causally related to?

A

The ability to lie (DING et al., 2015)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When does TOM first develop?

A

TOM isn’t completely absent in young children (children < 4)…
i.e. 6 month olds understand that people act on their intentions (Woodward, 1998)

i.e.2 2 year olds seem to understand that their thoughts can be different from the state of reality (LESLIE, 1987) - this is shown through pretend play (involves having a bit of a departure from reality).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the shift between ages 2 and 3 in terms of TOM development?

A

3 year olds have an awareness that thoughts exist - they understand mental entities have different properties to physical ones - you can’t touch a dream (ESTES ET AL., 1989).
(shift between ages 2 and 3 in understanding that thoughts exist).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

When does language start to develop?

A

Language, involving mental state language starts to develop from about age 2 (@ age 2, children use language about perceptual properties i.e. they ‘want’, ‘see’, ‘taste’).

Then from age 3 they start using words involving cognitive states - words around thinking - i.e. ‘know’ and ‘think’
- when 3 year olds use these 2 words together, this shows an understanding of contrasting mental states (reality vs. belief)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

When does the ability to understand that other people have desires develop?

A

around 18 months of age.

18-month old infants can understand people may have desires different to their own (REPACHOLI + GOPNIK, 1997).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Incomplete beliefs

A

= not full understanding, some understanding = ‘incomplete’

by age 3, children understand that their desires can motivate behaviour as well as beliefs AND they understand that behaviour might be motivated by incomplete beliefs.

it seems that understanding incomplete beliefs is easier than understanding inaccurate (false) beliefs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Example of an incomplete belief

A

if a child learns a character thinks books are only on the shelf, not in the toy box, children will guess the character will only look on the shelf, even if the child knows the books are in the toy box too (WELLMAN, 1990)
(= understanding other people’s incomplete beliefs)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Is it possible for infants to understand false beliefs?

A

ONISHI + BAILLARGEON (2005) - green + yellow box - 2 conditions (true belief or false belief)

concluded - 15 month old infants have false-belief understanding (= surprising)

17
Q

What are the 2 possible systems for TOM proposed by LESLIE et al, 2005

A
  1. IMPLICIT TOM - innate or very early learnt. There without awareness + children will maintain this skill but can’t express it verbally
  2. EXPLICIT TOM - learned more slowly + with awareness.. Developed in accordance with interaction with other people + building blocks of TOM.

3 year olds who fail false belief tasks generally do know the right response, they just can’t express it (CLEMENTS + PERNER, 1994).

18
Q

What is the Theory-Theory of TOM development?

A

Proposed by WELLMAN, 1990
- 2 yr olds - have a theory based on DESIRE psych > they assume that people’s desires influence their behaviour

  • 3 yr olds - have a theory based on BELIEF-DESIRE psych > they take into account others’ desires + beliefs (but only true ones, not so much about wrong/false ones)
  • @ age 4, children make the crucial realisation that beliefs are interpretations and they may be inaccurate (false).
19
Q

What is the meta-representation theory of TOM development?

A

PERNER (1991)
- the idea that preschoolers struggle on false belief tasks because they can’t hold 2 representations of an object simultaneously (not because they don’t understand the false belief)

  • @ age 4, the ability to have these meta-representations develops + so they can therefore pass the false belief tasks.
20
Q

Why has the meta-representation theory of TOM development been disputed?

A

Because from the age of 2, children engage in pretend play which involves meta-representations (LESLIE, 1987).

21
Q

Limitation of the theory-theory and meta-representation theory of TOM development

A

Both theories/representations struggle to explain early competencies in some aspects of TOM.

22
Q

What is the Executive function accounts of TOM development?

A

A better account of TOM development than the other 2 theories….

(CARLSON + MOSES, 2001)
Children fail on false belief tasks because they have poor cognitive skills/their cognitive skills are yet to develop.

  • preschoolers have poor executive function skills (working memory + inhibitory control - the ability to suppress automatic, but incorrect behaviours)
  • in order to succeed on TOM tasks, they need these basic information processing skills.
    > suggesting that executive function skills support TOM (HUGHES + ENSOR, 2007).
23
Q

Individual differences in TOM development

A

Language Skills

Interactions with others

Autism spectrum disorders

24
Q

Language skills as an individual difference in TOM development

A

Better language skills are associated with better TOM skills (MILLIGAN et al., 2007)
Delayed language development is associated with delayed TOM development (SCHICH et al., 2007)/(WOOLFE et al., 2002)

25
Q

Interactions with others - individual differences in TOM

A

Interactions with people older than the child and with those involving mental state language are correlated with greater TOM (MEINS et al., 2002)

26
Q

Evidence for the role of interacting with others in TOM development

A

LEWIS et al (1996) - found that you could predict a child’s TOM skills by the number of adults they were interacting with everyday.

27
Q

Autism Spectrum disorders - individual differences in TOM

A

Children with ASD don’t have TOM, or have an impaired TOM.

BARON-COHEN et al (1985) - ASD involves a TOM impairment (used the Sally-Anne task)
- found that 80% of typically developing 4-year olds passed.
- 80% of children with down syndrome passed (mental age of 4)
20% of children with ASD passed (mental age of 4)

28
Q

BAREN-COHEN et al (1986) research - ASD and TOM

A

Children with ASD…

  • can sort pictures to make a mechanical story
  • can sort pictures to make a behavioural story
  • CAN’T sort pictures of a mentalistic story (where they would have to infer a person’s thoughts)

Children with ASD find it difficult to deceive… in order to deceive, you need to have a TOM.