Things to know Flashcards

(17 cards)

1
Q

empiricism

A

rejects EWS. Claims that there is knowledge of the external world, and that we come to acquire this knowledge a posteriori (i.e., our justification must ultimately appeal to sensory experience).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

rationalism

A

rejects EWS. Claims that there is knowledge of the external world, and that we come to acquire this knowledge a priori (i.e., prior to, or independent of, sensory experience).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

phenomenalism

A

a version of EWS which claims that only the facts about ones own sensations (and other “inner” workings of one’s own mind) are knowable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

external world skepticism (EWS)

A

a version of local skepticism which claims that knowledge of the external world is impossible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Skepticism(s)

A

the theory that knowledge is impossible in either all areas of inquiry (global skepticism) or some areas of inquiry (local skepticism).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The nous

A

Aristotle rejects the assumption that knowledge of a syllogism’s premises must always be demonstrated by a prior syllogism. He suggests that humans are endowed with a “nous:” a special capacity for recognizing “self-evident” truths. What are “self-evident truths?” Some think it’s a capacity for picking out logical and mathematical truths like 2-2=0. And some think it’s a capacity for recognizing incorrigible truths about experience, like the truth that “I’m sensing blueness when I look at that shirt.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Rationalism-as-Science:

A

scientific knowledge amounts to coming to deduce necessary truths about the world via a priori means.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how is an argument sound?

A

iff (a) all premises are true (b) it is valid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is validity?

A

no logical possible circumstances where premises is true and conclusion is false. invalid if premise fails to guarantee the conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Phenomenology

A

the task of describing the surface appearance of things: how things seem to you.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Phenomenology-as-Science

A

scientific knowledge amounts to nothing more than tracking the patterns of one’s own sensory experience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Empiricism-as-a-science

A

scientific knowledge is the tracking of objective truths about the external world using one’s sensations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Epistemic Fallibilism

A

the view that knowledge does not require certainty, it only requires a high level of justification; so you can have knowledge of something, despite that you admit the possibility of it being false.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Verificationism

A

the theory of language which accounts for the meaning of a scientific claim in terms of it’s verification conditions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Verification Conditions

A

a third-person description of the sensations that would, upon having them, allow us to ascertain the truth or falsity of that claim.