Topic 1: Historical Context of Mental Illness Flashcards

(63 cards)

1
Q

Who can diagnose disorders?

A

Psychiatrists or psychologists.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define demonic possession.

A

The belief that everyone and everything has a soul, and that evil spirits had taken possession of an individual and controlled their behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did Hippocrates think madness resulted from?

A

An imbalance of the four humours and could therefore be cured by balancing these four humours: blood, phlegm, yellow bile, black bile.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the main way of treating the mentally ill in the 18th century?

A

To treat them like animals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explain why people believed that madness resulted from animalism.

A

The person had lost the capacity of ‘reason’, which is the one thing they felt distinguishes humans from beasts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Regarding animalism, how would the mentally ill be treated?

A

The 1st part of the treatment was to restore reason, and it was believed that fear was the emotion that was best suited to restoring disordered minds.
- They would be kept locked up, chained and possibly whipped.
- Other treatments such as bleeding, blistering, making them sick and drugs were given with the belief that the insane didn’t have the sensitivities of human beings – but like animals lack of sensitivity to pain, temperature and other stimuli.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Philippe Pinel (1700s) believe?

A

Mental disorders can be caused by psychological or social stress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did Philippe Pinel (1700s) argue?

A

For the humane treatment of patients and the maintenance of detailed case histories.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did Philippe Pinel’s (1700s) approach reject?

A

The concept of demonic possession.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did Philippe Pinel (1700s) petition for?

A

To remove chains from patients and allow them to exercise in the open air, he also worked on discontinuing practices such as bloodletting and purging.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe how abnormality is defined regarding statistical information.

A

Behaviour is abnormal if it falls outside the norm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the problem with using statistical information to define abnormality?

A

Just because something is rare doesn’t mean that it equates with a psychological disorder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Describe how abnormality is defined regarding failure to function adequately.

A
  • In society, we have expectations about how people should live their lives.
  • When someone is unable to meet these obligations and cannot live a ‘normal’ life, they are seen as not functioning adequately.
  • Usually, these people are unaware of themselves.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the problem with using ‘failure to function adequately’ to define abnormality?

A

Subjective, as some people may not align with societal norms but it doesn’t necessarily mean they are unwell.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe how abnormality is defined regarding deviation from social norms.

A

Social norms are the expected/approved ways of living, and when they’re defied, people tend to be surprised.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the problem with using ‘deviation from social norms’ to define abnormality?

A

Just because someone doesn’t follow social norms does not mean that they have psychological problems.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Describe how abnormality is defined regarding deviation from ideal mental health: state 4 aspects of ideal mental health.

A
  • Positive about yourself
  • Acting independently
  • Having an accurate perception of reality
  • Positive social interactions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Describe how abnormality is defined regarding deviation from ideal mental health: state 5 aspects of signs of abnormalities in mental health.

A
  • Violation of moral standards
  • Irrational behaviours
  • Unpredictability
  • Unconventional behaviour
  • Maladaptiveness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the problem with using ‘deviation from ideal mental health’ to define abnormality?

A
  • Difficult to access
  • Just because people show these traits doesn’t mean they have a psychological disorder
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

State the 5 additional categories that the DSM-5 includes information about.

A
  1. Gender related diagnosis issues
  2. Culture-related diagnosis issues
  3. Co-morbidity (which disorders frequently occur together)
  4. Prevalence (frequency between age groups)
  5. Diagnosis criteria
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What does DSM-5 attempt to record?

A

All disorders, both physical and mental.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

How is DSM-5 organised?

A

On developmental and lifespan considerations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

How many categories are in DSM-5? Give some examples.

A

22 categories of mental disorder, e.g. neurodevelopmental disorders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

State the clusters disorders in DSM-5. Internalising disorders (depression/anxiety)

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Evaluate validity regarding categorising disorders.
- Psychiatric disorder categorisation relies on potentially biased self-report data, impacting validity. - Clinician bias exists, demonstrated by differential diagnoses based on patient gender (Ford & Widiger study).
26
Evaluate validity regarding defining abnormality.
If the way of defining abnormality is very subjective, e.g. deviation from social norms
27
Evaluate reliability regarding defining abnormality.
- Some of the methods are likely to be more consistent than others. - Deviation from social norms is least likely to lead to consistency, and statistical infrequency is most reliable, as psychiatrists are dealing with numbers which are more subjective and reliable.
28
Evaluate reliability regarding categorising disorders.
Despite there being manuals to categorise disorders, there could still be disagreements between psychiatrists, especially as diagnosis relies on self-report → inconsistency in diagnosis.
29
Evaluate the usefulness of defining abnormality.
- Useful as long as ways of defining are accurate, so treatment can be given. - Defining is subjective, so less useful as people may be considered abnormal when they are not.
30
Evaluate the usefulness of categorising disorders.
- Using the DSM/ICD is useful as psychiatrists can prescribe treatment for the condition. - However, it gives individuals labels which could have a negative impact.
31
Evaluate ethnocentrism regarding defining abnormality.
What is 'abnormal' in one culture may be 'normal' in another.
32
Evaluate ethnocentrism regarding categorising disorders.
- Some disorders are not recognised in some cultures. - Different manuals in different cultures may include conditions that are culture-specific.
33
Rosenhan: What was the aim of the study?
To see is mental hospital in the USA in the early 1970s could tell the sane from the insane.
34
Rosenhan: Study 1: Describe the sample and how many hospitals they called for an appointment.
- 8 sane people - 12 different mental hospitals
35
Rosenhan: Study 1: What did the participants say to get administered?
That they hear an unfamiliar voice of the same sex saying 'empty', 'hollow' and 'thud'. They all gave fake names.
36
Rosenhan: Study 1: What did participants stop doing once they were admitted, and what did they make notes on?
Stopped simulating any symptoms and took part in regular ward activities, all the time making notes for the ward staff and patients.
37
Rosenhan: Study 1: Describe what the pseudopatients were diagnosed with.
One patient was diagnosed with manic-depressive psychosis, and all the others were diagnosed with schizophrenia.
38
Rosenhan: Study 1: How long did the participants remain in the hospital?
7 to 52 days (average of 19 days)
39
Rosenhan: Study 1: Once participants were discharged, what were they diagnosed with?
Schizophrenia 'in remission'.
40
Rosenhan: Study 1: How many patients voiced their suspicions? Give qualitative examples of what they said.
35 out of 118 - "You're not crazy" - "You're a journalist or a professor" - "You're checking up on the hospital"
41
Rosenhan: Study 1: Give an example of how the participant's normal behaviours were misinterpreted as a symptom of their 'disorder'.
A group of patients queuing up early for lunch was described as displaying oral acquisitive behaviour which is prominent in those with schizophrenia.
42
Rosenhan: Study 1: Who could patient records be seen by and how did some ward staff acts towards patients when other staff weren't around?
Anyone could see patient records. Some ward staff were brutal to patients in full view of other patients, but stopped when another member of staff approached.
43
Rosenhan: Study 1: What was the percentage of time that attendants spent outside of 'the cage' (ward office)?
11.3%
44
Rosenhan: Study 1: What was the total time a patient spent with psychologists per day on average?
6.8 minutes.
45
Rosenhan: Study 1 The Experiment: What would pseudopatients in 4 of the hospitals approach a staff member and ask?
"Pardon me, Mr/Mrs/Dr X, could you tell me when I will be presented at the staff meeting?"
46
Rosenhan: Study 1 The Experiment: What was recorded regarding the staff members' reaction to the polite request?
Whether they moved on with their head averted, made eye contact, paused and chatted, or stopped and talked.
47
Rosenhan: Study 1 The Experiment: Describe the comparison study that was carried out at Stanford University.
A young female would approach a member of staff who looked busy and ask them 6 questions, including "Pardon me, could you direct me to Enciena Hall?" and "How does one apply for admission to the college?"
48
Rosenhan: Study 1 The Experiment: Describe the comparison study that was carried out at a University Research Centre.
A young female said (amongst 6 questions that she had to ask) either "I'm looking for a psychiatrist" or "I'm looking for an internist".
49
Rosenhan: Study 2: What was a teaching and research hospital informed of?
During the next 3 months, 1+ pseudopatients would attempt to be admitted into the hospital.
50
Rosenhan: Study 2: What was each member of staff asked to do?
Rate on a 10-point scale each new patient as to the likelihood of them being a pseudopatient (but treat everyone as a real patient so that no one would miss out on treatment that they needed).
51
Rosenhan: Study 2: How many pseudopatients attempted to be admitted?
0
52
Rosenhan: Conclusions: What were mental hospitals in the USA in the early 1970s not good at?
Making accurate and reliable diagnoses.
53
Rosenhan: Conclusions: What did mental hospitals in the USA in the early 1970s tend to view all behaviours of patients as?
As reflecting their diagnosis (stickiness of psychodiagnostic labels).
54
Comment on Rosenhan's study about ethnocentrism.
- Only conducted in the USA but across multiple states and different types of hospitals (private/public & old/new). - Likely, patients in the 1970s in other cultures were treated similarly, as mental illnesses were not given the same attention as physical illnesses.
55
Comment on Rosenhan's study about ethical considerations.
- Medical staff/patients didn't consent to observation. - Not protected as they were judged/felt bad. - Deception (didn't know of the study). - Hospitals didn't consent/agree to access 'fake' patients. - No named recorded - maintained confidentiality.
56
Comment on Rosenhan's study about validity.
→ No demand characteristics. → High ecological validity. → Low ecological validity as it is unusual for fake patients to be admitted based on hearing 3 words. → Quantitative and qualitative data (increase validity). → The diagnosis isn't accurate.
57
Comment on Rosenhan's study about reliability.
→ Multiple hospitals with similar results. → Large sample. → Same controls. → Time locked (can't be repeated). → The diagnosis was not consistent.
58
Comment on Rosenhan's study about the usefulness of research.
→ Allows changes to be made in psychiatric hospitals/change of treatment of patients, and diagnosis in DSM. → People were shocked by the poor treatment, so conditions had to change.
59
Comment on Rosenhan's study about individual/situational explanations.
Situational: staffing levels and hospital procedures. Individual: differences in how symptoms are experienced and has people cope with them.
60
State 5 symptoms of an affective disorder: Depression.
→ Depressed mood most of the day. → Diminished please/interest in activities all day. → Body weight loss of more than 5% (not due to diet). → Insomnia or excessive sleep. → Restlessness/less activity.
61
State 5 symptoms of a psychotic disorder: Schizophrenia.
→ Delusions. → Hallucinations. → Disorganised speech. → Grossly disorganised/catatonic behaviour. → Negative symptoms.
62
What are negative symptoms?
The removal/loss of normal function.
63
State 5 situations that may cause fear in an anxiety disorder: Phobias.
→ Using public transport → Being in open spaces → Being in enclosed spaces → Standing in a line/crowd → Being outside of the home