Topic 1: Introduction to the History of Psychology Flashcards
Histroriography
the study of the proper way to write history
Presentism
interpreting and evaluating historical events in terms of contemporary knowledge and standards
Historicism
the study of the past for its own sake, without attempting t interpret and evaluate it in terms of current knowledge and standards, as is the case with presentism
Zeitgeist
the spirit of the times
Great-Person Approach
the approach to history that concentrates on the most prominent contributors to the topic or field under consideration
Historical Development Approach
the approach to history that concentrates on an element of a field or discipline and describes how the understanding or approach to studying that element has changed over time
an example is a description of how mental illness has been defined and studied throughout history
Eclectic Approach
taking the best from a variety of viewpoints, the approach to the history of psychology taken in this text is eclectic because it combines coverage of great individuals, the development of ideas and concepts, the spirit of the times, and contributions from other disciplines
Science
traditionally, the systematic attempt to rationally categorize or explain empirical observations
Empirical Observation
the direct observation of that which is being studied in order to understand it
Rationalism
the philosophical belief that knowledge can be attained only by engaging in some type of systemic mental activity
Empiricism
the belief that the basis of all knowledge is experience
Scientific Theory
traditionally, a proposed explanation of a number of empirical observations
according to Popper, a proposed solution to a problem
Confirmable Propositions
within science, propositions capable of validation through empirical tests
Scientific Law
a consistently observed relationship between classes of empirical events
Public Observation
the stipulation that scientific laws must be available for any interested person to observe
science is interested in general, empirical relationships that are publicly verifiable
Correlational Laws
laws that specify the systematic relationships among classes of empirical events
unlike causal laws, the events described by correlational laws do not need to be causally related
Causal Laws
laws describing causal relationships
such laws specify the conditions that are necessary and sufficient to produce a certain event
knowledge of causal laws allows both the prediction and control of events
Determinism
the belief that everything that occurs does so because of known or knowable causes that if these causes were known in advance, an event could be predicted with complete accuracy
also, if the causes of an event were know, the event could be prevented by preventing its causes
thus, the knowledge of an event’s causes allows the prediction and control of the event
Karl Popper (1902-1994)
saw scientific method as having three components: problems, proposed solutions to the problems (theories), and criticisms of the proposed solutions
because all scientific theories will eventfully be found to be false, the highest status any scientific theory can attain is not yet disconfirmed
Principle of Falsifiability
Popper’s contention that for a theory to be considered scientific it must specify the observations that, if made, would refute the theory
to be considered scientific, a theory must make risky predictions
Risky Predictions
according to Popper, predictions derived from a scientific theory that run a real chance of showing the theory to be false
for example, if a meteorological theory predicts that it will rain at a specific place at a specific time, then it must do so or the theory will be shown to be incorrect
Postdiction
an attempt to account for something after it has occurred
postdiction is contrasted with prediction, which attempts to specify the conditions under which an event that has not yet occurred will occur
Correspondence Theory of Truth
the belief that scientific laws and theories are correct insofar they accurately mirror events in the physical world
Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996)
believed that the activities of members of a scientific community are governed by a shared set of beliefs called a paradigm
this paradigmatic, or normal, science continues until an existing paradigm is displaced by another paradigm