topic 1.1 - Compare criminal behaviour and deviance Flashcards
(37 cards)
What are values?
Values are general principles or guidelines for how we should live our lives. They tell us what is right and wrong, good and bad.
What are norms?
While values lay down general principles or guidelines, norms are specific rules or socially accepted standards that govern peoples behaviour in particular situations.
What is an example of a value that is found in all societies?
respect for human life
What is an example of a value that may be specific to particular societies?
Societies such as the UK and USA place a high value on individuals accumulating personal wealth, which is seen as a worthy goal to pursue where as many traditional societies such as those of Native America place a high value on the duty of individuals to share their wealth in their group.
What are moral codes?
the term ‘moral codes’ is often used to describe a set of basic rules, values and principles held by an individual, group, organisation or society as a whole.
What is an example of a moral code which is written down?
The police code of ethics is a written guide to the core principles and standards that officers are expected to uphold in their work. The police code lays down 9 principles.
What is deviance?
Deviance is any behaviour that differs from normal. In other words it is behaviour that is unusual, uncommon or out of the ordinary in some way.
What are the 3 different ways something can be deviant?
1) behaviour that is unusual and good. 2) behaviour that is unusual and eccentric or bizzare 3) behaviour that is unusual and bad or disapproved of (most relevant to criminologists)
Why is ‘behaviour that is unusual and bad or disapproved of’ the type of deviance most relevant to criminologists?
This type of deviance involves doing something which is forbidden and regarded as unacceptable. It involves breaking a rule or norm of some kind. This rule breaking leads to a critical, hostile or disapproving reaction from others. These ‘others’ might be society as a whole or a sub -group within society and their reaction may involve punishing the deviant in some way .
Forms of deviance
societies have many different rules and therefore deviance, which involves breaking these rules can take many different forms. These can range from extremely serious acts such as rape, murder or arson to very trivial things such as queue- jumping
Formal sanctions against deviance
formal sanctions are the ones imposed by official bodies such as the police, courts, schools or other institutions. They are punishments for breaking formal written rules or laws. For example, courts may fine an offender for theft or schools may exclude a pupil for bullying.
Informal sanctions against deviance
informal sanctions are used when the rules are not formally written down and are perhaps ‘unspoken’. When someone breaks these rules others show their disapproval in informal ways such as refusing to speak to them, telling them off, a slap on the wrist ect.
Positive sanctions
sanctions can also be positive, such as rewards for behaviour that society approves of. Examples include medals of bravery or for sporting achievement.
The legal definition of criminal behaviour
In law criminal behaviour is any action that is forbidden by the criminal law. For a court to consider a defendant’s action a crime, the actions must formally have 2 elements: actus reus and mens rea.
what is actus reus?
latin term for ‘a guilty act’
what is mens rea?
meaning a ‘guilty mind’
The legal definition of criminal behaviour - strict liability
in some cases, mens rea is not required - the wrongful act alone is enough to convict someone. Many health and safety laws operate on this basis.
The legal definition of criminal behaviour - strict liability - example
A factory owner who is negligent and fails so safeguard dangerous machinery is liable for the injuries to workers resulting from this even if the owner had no bad intentions
The legal definition of criminal behaviour - self defence
assaulting someone (an actus reus) with the deliberate intention to harm them ( a mens rea) is usually a criminal act. However, if it is done in self defence it is not a crime - so long as the force used was reasonable for the situation.
The social definition of criminal behaviour
although law does define many harmful acts as crime not all harmful acts are in fact criminal. For example: anti-pollution laws often specify how much of a pollutant a firm can legally emit, even though this may still harm the environment. and not all criminal acts are particularly harmful. Many trival or victimless acts are still crimes. Rather than relying on the legal definition alone we can gain a better understanding of criminal behaviour by considering how it is defined socially. This includes 3 aspects:.
The social definition of criminal behaviour - differing views
The public often have a different view on what acts are ‘really’ crimes, as compared with the legal definitions of crimes. for example users of soft drugs may not see themselves as criminals.
The social definition of criminal behaviour - law enforcement
not all criminal laws are enforced, some come low on the list of priorities for the police for example white collar crimes are usually complex, costly and time consuming to investigate and prosecute.
The social definition of criminal behaviour - law making
not all acts that people think ought to be made into crimes have laws passed against them. Which actions get officially made illegal often depends on who has the power to influence the law-makers such as the media, campaigning pressure groups or big businesses. Sometimes laws are changed to reflect changes in public opinion with some actions being decriminalised and other previously legal ones being redefined as crimes e.g stalking did not become a specific offence until the protection of freedoms act was passed in 2012.
acts that are criminal - seriousness of the offence
in the UK, the law distinguishes between 2 main types of offence: summary offences and indictable offences. In the past English law used to make a distinction between misdemeanours (minor crimes) and felonies (serious crimes). This distinction is still used in the USA.