Topic 2: Imaging Review Flashcards
(53 cards)
What is the persuasive power of the dead salmon poster?
the persuasive power of the dead salmon poster largely comes from the fact that it provides a rare example in which we actually know with certainty that a statistically significant result is a false positive
this was especially problematic given the large number of datapoints that are typically collected in a fMRI study, related to the concept of a “voxel”
What is a type 1 error?
the more comparisons you make between various data points, the more likely you are to find a statistically significant result purely by chance (i.e., a type 1 error) if you don’t take the appropriate statistical steps in order to control for multiple comparisons
What are functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) analyses?
fMRI analyses “draw” what we can think of as imaginary boundaries based on three-dimensional pixels (voxels) that are superimposed onto the brain
analyses typically compare estimates for activity levels across different (groups of) voxels
e.g., are the voxels that overlap the region in space that the amygdala occupies more active during the “scary picture” condition, as compared to a control condition?
How were false positives found in the dead salmon poster?
many early fMRI datasets were analyzed by comparing the activity level of each voxel to every other voxel in the dataset
this means that the rate of false positives for studies that did not correct for multiple comparisons are assumed to be greatly inflated
What are the confounds that are involved in the Christmas spirit network?
one possibility could be a confound related to memory
for example, many people who celebrate Christmas and have positive associations with it have more memories associated with the Christmas stimuli, which could lead to greater activation (or “recruitment”) of memory-relevant brain regions
we could speculate about lots of other potential reasons why the implicated regions may have difference in activation levels across groups
among other things, this also demonstrates the gap between the objective data on the one hand, and the (inherently, at least somewhat) subjective interpretation on the other
What is localization of function?
another consideration that could be relevant for methodological and/or interpretation reasons relates to localization of function, or the idea that we have specific brain regions (or networks) that are specialized for certain kinds of stimuli and/or engaging in particular kinds of processing
localization of function is often assumed, and may even be evident in data, yet can nevertheless sometimes be an oversimplification
Is the fusiform face area a good example of localization of function?
the fusiform face area (or FFA) has been heavily studied and tends to become more active when we process stimuli that is more “face-like”
this has been taken to mean that the FFA is causally responsible for our ability to perceive faces
as more people publish studies that fit with this idea, more people continue looking for supporting evidence (confirmation bias?)
while there is lots of evidence to back up these claim, are there some other possibilities?
What are other explanations for the localization of function in the fusiform face area?
one kind of alternative interpretation of the FFA is that is simply one of many regions in the brain that contribute to the perception of not only faces, but also various other kinds of stimuli
while the FFA has been observed to be approximately twice as active when people are presented with face and face-like stimuli (as compared to non-face stimuli), it is also sometimes found to be more active for non-face stimuli (as compared to baseline)
so, although it responds to faces, it can also respond to other kinds of stimuli too… does that justify how it gets discussed (“the face center”)? how does that line up with the conventional understanding of what it does?
What is phrenology?
a belief system that attempted to relate variation in the shape of different parts of the skull with behavior and cognition
although not done with scientific rigor, this general idea is similar to the modern concept of localization of function
What is mass action?
proposed that specific functions were in fact not localized to particular parts of the brain
What is equipotentiality?
assumes any chunk of cortical tissue has the potential to support any brain function
What is plasticity?
tissue in different parts of the brain can “take over” for other damaged parts and effectively relocate functions, albeit there are limitations
What kind of evidence would support a mass action view?
kidney analogy: damage is similar regardless of whether it is located in the lower, middle, or upper portion, simply reduces it’s capacity/efficiency
Karl Lashley example: location of lesion didn’t seem to matter, just the size
What early work supports the localization of function of language?
Broca and Wernicke’s area
What early work supports the localization of function of visual perception?
lesions in one hemisphere cause problems in the opposite visual field (because of contralateral wiring), posterior damage affects vision but anterior damages doesn’t, etc.
What early work supports the localization of function of motor functions?
“Jacksonian March” seizures, a particular type that starts at the fingers and spreads up the arm
the advancement of sterile surgery practices opened the door to the systematic/experimental study of brain lesions using stereotaxic surgery
Who was Herbert Jasper?
one of the pioneers in the use of electroencephalograms (EEG) to study brain function
Jasper worked with Wilder Penfield, who used electrodes to stimulate various parts of the brain to map out what parts of the brain did what in particular patients (to know what parts of tissue should/shouldn’t be removed to help reduce epileptic symptoms)
e.g., could map out the motor cortex and avoid removing chunks of tissue that are required to control movement
What is high spatial resolution versus high temporal resolution?
as a generalization, we can contrast imaging methods that have high spatial resolution with those that have high temporal resolution
high spatial: fMRI, PET
high temporal: EEG/ERP, MEG
What is an electroencephalogram (EEG)?
EEG provides an overall measure of electrical activity emanating from the brain on the basis of the signal that reaches electrodes placed on the scalp
this electrical activity fluctuates between different characteristic frequencies, which are each associated with particular states of consciousness
there are various clinically-relevant applications for EEG technology (e.g., screen for seizure activity)
What are event-related potentials (ERPs)?
while the raw waveform produced by an EEG can be informative in and of itself, many cognitive psychologists are (depending on the research questions they’re asking) interested in using EEGs to measure event-related potentials (ERPs)
ERP’s measure average characteristic changes in electrical activity associated with particular psychological events (e.g., a stimulus presentation)
calculation of ERP requires signal averaging to form a grand average for multiple subjects across many trials that is time-locked to a specific event
What are the ERP naming conventions?
have two parts, a letter or a number
the letter: N (for negative deflection, i.e. decrease in voltage) or P (for positive deflection, i.e. increase in voltage)
the number: 1, 2, or 3 (or 100, 200, or 300), depending on how many milliseconds after the time-locked event (e.g. stimulus presentation) before the component typically appears
What are the standard components associated with particular kinds of processes?
e.g., the P1 component is a positive deflection that occurs approximately 100 ms after a visual stimulus is presented
on the basis of the specific of the experiment, you can then try to make inferences about what differences in signals related to those components can tell you
What aspects of an ERP are the most informative?
the presence/absence of particular kind of ERP in response to an event can be informative, through the timing and/or magnitude of the ERP elicited is often more informative
smaller amplitude and/or delayed onset of an ERP could indicate diminished or impaired processing
How has ERP data been used to examine cognitive function in clinical population?
ERP data associated with Alzheimer’s patients (AD) and those diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) show ERP signals that:
are “smaller” (the vertical dimension, or Y axis, plotting the signal as a function of amplitude)
have a delayed onset (the horizontal dimension, or X axis, plotting the signal as a function of time)