Topic 3 (Year 12): Teleological argument Flashcards

(17 cards)

1
Q

Teleological definition.

A

Looking to the end results (telos) in order to draw a conclusion about what is right or wrong.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Natural theology definition.

A

Drawing conclusions about the nature and activity of God by using reason and observing the world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Contingent definition.

A

Dependant on other things.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Principle of sufficient reason definition.

A

The principle that everything must have a reason to explain it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

A posteriori argument definition.

A

Arguments which draw conclusions based on observation through experience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Necessary existence definition.

A

Existence which does not depend on anything else.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Logical fallacy definition.

A

Reasoning that has a flaw in its structure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How many ways does Aquinas have in his ‘Summa Theologica’ to prove the existence of God?

A

5 ways.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Which of Aquinas’ ways is in relation to the teleological argument?

A

The fifth way.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What example does Aquinas use to show the existence of a designer?

A

An arrow not being able to hit a target without an archer being there.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Who does Aquinas think this designer is?

A

“This being we call God.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is design qua regularity?

A

Design in relation to the order and regularity in the universe.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is design qua purpose?

A

Considers evidence of design by the way the parts of the universe seem to fit together for a purpose.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does Paley compare the rock on a heath to?

A

A pocketwatch.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does Paley compare the watch to?

A

The universe: he says that the universe exhibits purpose and regularity and so must have been designed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Who does Paley think this designer is?

17
Q

Three of Hume’s objections.

A

1 - Fallacy of composition: we cannot say that what is observed about the parts cannot be assumed to be the same as the whole.
2 - Epicurean thesis: there is a possibility that the finite number of particles in the universe found the one combination that has created all order in the universe.
3 - Evolution: natural selection relies on random genetic mutation; some species can adapt due to the mutation, they survive whilst the previous animals may die out.