topic 5 Flashcards
(18 cards)
jurisdiction of civil courts
supreme: unlimited hears serious civil cases and appeals
county: Unlimited – no minimum or maximum $ amount
magistrate: plaintiff seeking up to 100,000
civil court hierarchy
the high court, the court of appeals supreme, county, magistrate
appeal hierarchy
high court- appeals from the court of Appeals
court of appeals- supreme of county
supreme- county
Burden of proof
plaintiff and procession
standard of proof
on the balance of probabilities, liable or non liable and beyond reasonable doubt
plaintiff
party who brought cases to court who has had wrong done by them and seeking a legal remedy
defendant
accused, being sued by the plaintiff
damges
Damages are intended to restore the injured party to the position they would have been in had the harm not occurred.
precedent
a judgement of a court that establishes a legal principle or point of law
binding and persuasive precedent
Binding – decision made by superior (upper) court is binding on all inferior (lower) courts in that jurisdiction where the cases involve materially similar facts
So if the Court of Appeal makes a decision, all courts in Vic have to follow the principle of
that decision in later cases involving the same material facts
Persuasive – could be
- a decision of the court in another hierarchy (for example, New South Wales or India or
Texas); or - a decision of the equal or lower court in the same hierarchy;
Precedents can be binding - you have to follow them, persuasive - they may influence you but you do not have to follow
Donoghue vs Stevenson, neighbour principle
you own a duty of care to your neigbour
negligence
looking out for other people
anyone who you can reasonably foresee might get injured if you do not take enough care
negligence 3 elements the plaintiff has to prove on the balance of probabilities
1-The defendant owed the plaintiff a duty of care
2-The defendant breached that duty of care
3-The breach of the duty of care caused harm or loss to the
plaintiff
defemation
reputation
Specifically, the law protects us from having our reputation trashed by other
people spreading lies about us
defamation 3 things the plaintiff needs to establish on the balance of probabilities
1- Defendant published something about the plaintiff- any form to at least one other person
2-The thing that was published was untrue
3-As a result of the publication, the plaintiff suffered loss of reputation
what is civil law
private disputes between two individuals or a group, civil law is in place to protect your rights It is all about rights and responsibilities
reasons for civil law
Protect our rights
-Right to ensure those who should look out for us are doing so
-Right to live at home without noise/trespassers
-Right to ensure our reputation is not unfairly trashed
-Impose duty on others not to harm us/infringe upon our rights
So everyone in society has clear responsibility to look out for each other and avoid doing certain types of harm to others
- Provide a remedy (solution) if our rights are breached
doctrine of precedent
1- All inferior (lower down) courts are bound to follow the decisions of superior
(higher up) courts
2-Courts only have to follow decision made by superior courts in the same hierarchy
3-Cases must involve same material (important) facts
So inferior (lower down) courts need to follow the decisions of superior (higher
up) courts in the same hierarchy in cases where the material facts are the same!