Topic 5: International Asset Pricing Models Flashcards

1
Q

Why study?

A

i) Why some strategies are profitable? Risk premium? systematic risk? Need asset pricing model to determine “systematic risk/risk premium

ii) To answer practical questions (investing into a hedge fund? A new profitable strategy? Factor investing?)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Domestic Asset Pricing Models

A

CAPM
Fama French 3 factor model
Carhart 4 factor model
Fama French 5 factor model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How to test CAPM

A

E(rj,t) − rf,t = βj(E(rm,t) − rf,t)

1: run regression using historical data to estimate Alpha and Beta

2: Take expectation on the regression: E(rj,t) − rf,t = αj + βj(E(rm,t) − rf,t)

3: CAPM holds when α = 0. We test this hypothesis statistically. If α ≠ 0, the CAPM doesn’t hold (so-called CAPM anomalies)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

CAPM anomalies

A

Size anomaly
Value anomaly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Size anomaly

A

Small firm stocks tend to have higher HPRs, even after accounting for the CAPM beta risk

How to implement: buy a portfolio of small firms (S) but you finance it by short-selling a portfolio of large firms (B)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Value anomaly

A

Value firm stocks tend to have higher returns, even after accounting for the CAPM beta risk

How to implement: buying a portfolio of value firms (H) but you finance it by short-selling a portfolio of growth firms (L) = HML

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Fama-French-3-factor model

A

(‘alpha’ become ‘beta’):
E(Rj,t) − Rf,t = βj(E(Rm,t ) − Rf,t) + Sj E(SMBt)+ HjE(HMLt)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Fama-French Anomalies

A

Momentum Anomaly
Profitability Anomaly
Investment Anomaly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Momentum Anomaly

A

Past winners tend to have higher HRPs, even after accounting for the FF 3F risks

How to implement: buy a portfolio of past winners (W) but you finance it by short-selling a portfolio of past losers (L)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Profitability anomaly

A

Past profitable firms stocks tend to have higher returns, even after accounting for the FF 3F risks

How to implement: buy a portfolio of past robust profitable firms (R) but you finance it by short-selling past weak profitable firms (W)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Investment anomaly

A

Past low investment firm stocks tend to have higher returns, even after accounting for the FF 3F risks

How to implement: buy past conservative firms (portfolio C) but you finance it by short-selling past aggressive firms (portfolio A)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Carhart 4-Factor Model

A

(Alpha become Beta):
E(Rj,t) - Rf,t = βj(E(Rm,t ) − Rf,t) + Sj E(SMBt)+ HjE(HMLt) + WjE(WMLt)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Fama-French 5 factor model

A

(Alpha become Beta):
E(Rj,t) - Rf,t = βj(E(Rm,t ) − Rf,t) + Sj E(SMBt)+ HjE(HMLt) + R*jE(RMWt) + CjE(CMAt)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

International Asset Pricing Models

A

World CAPM
CAPM with Partial Integration
Bakaert and Harvey (1995s) model
International APT
International APT with partial integration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

World CAPM

A

E(rj,t) − rf,t = βj(E(rw,t) − rf,t)
with fully integrated markets and no premiums for taking FX risk (real returns + RPPP holds)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

CAPM with partial integration

A

Partially integrated? Psychological barriers, Legal restrictions, Transaction costs, Tax, Political risks, FX risks, etc

17
Q

Bekaert and Harvey (1995)’s model

A

Bekaert and Harvey (1995)’s model:

E(rj,t) − rf,t = wt[βj,w(E(rw,t) − rf,t)] + (1 − wt)[βj,l(E(rl,t) − rf,t)]

Note: Weights, wt, are determined by variables that proxy for the degree of integration, like size of trade sector and equity market capitalisation to GDP

18
Q

International APT

A

(local/regional/global anomalies: LSMB (e.g., UK-SMB), RSMB (e.g., Asian-SMB), GSMB (e.g., MSCI-SMB))

19
Q

International APT with partial integration

A

Fama-French 3-factor model with partial integration:
E(rj,t) − rf,t = βj,w(E(rw,t) − rf,t) + sj,GE(GSMBt)+ hj,GE(GHMLt) + βj,l(E(rl,t) − rf,t) + sj,lE(LSMBt)+ hj,lE(LHMLt)

Repeat for Carhart 4 factor and FF-5F with partial integration

20
Q

Karolyi and Wu (2018)’s 4-Factor model

A

Carhart 4-factor model with partial integration, but with different ways to define global/local factors

Investability Restriction: Karolyi and Wu (2014,WP) define globally-accessible stocks as follows: the stocks in the globally accessible sample need to be listed in the markets which are fully open to global investors or to be secondarily cross-listed in target markets (US, UK, etc.) with minimum foreign investment restrictions and reasonably active trading in foreign cross-listed issues).

They propose and test multi-factor models (e.g., Carhart with partial integration) based on factor portfolios comprised on only globally-accessible stocks (global factors) and of locally-accessible stocks (local factors)