Topic 5 - Interviews Flashcards
(44 cards)
What are the 4 main types of interviews that sociologists may use ?
-structured / formal interviews
-unstructured /informal interviews
-semi-structured interviews
-group interviews
Types of interviews - what are structured / formal interviews ?
-structured / formal interviews - are very similar to questionnaires , the interviewer is given strict instructions on how to ask the questions . The interview is conducted in the same standardised way each time , asking each interviewee precisely the same questions , word for word , in the same order , tone of voice and so on
Types of interviews - what are unstructured / informal interviews ?
-unstructured /informal interviews - are like a guided conversation . The interviewer has the complete freedom to vary the questions , their wording , order and so on from one interview to the next , pursuing whatever line of questioning seems appropriate at the time , asking follow up questions or probing more deeply
Types of interviews - what are semi structured interviews ?
-semi structured interviews -each interview has the same set of questions in common , but the interview can probe for more information , additional questions can be shed where the interviewer thinks its relevant
Types of interviews - what are group interviews ?
-group interviews - where up to a dozen or so people are being interviewed together
What type of interviews did Willis use ?
-Willis used group interviews as part of his research into the lads and schooling
What are focus groups ?
-focus groups are a form of group interview in which the researchers asks the group to discuss a certain topic , such as how pupils feel about school and the researcher then records their view
What are the strengths of group interviews ?
-participants may feel more comfortable being with others and thus more likely to open up
-in a discussion , participants often throw ideas around the group , stimulating each others thinking , which produces more reflective data
-they can be a useful way of generating initial ideas that can be followed up in later research
-the researcher can combine questioning with the opportunity to observe group dynamics and norms
What are the limitations of group interviews ?
-one or two do the individuals may dominate the discussion , which stops others from contributing
-much depends on the researchers ability to keep the group focused on the discussion topic
-peer group pressure to conform to group norms may lead participants not saying what they really think
-data generated from group interaction is more complex and difficult to analyse
What are the practical issues and advantages of structured interviews ?
-training interviewers is relatively straightforward and inexpensive , since all they are required to do is follow a set of instructions. However , this is more costly than simply posting or emailing questionnaires to people
-surveys that use structured interviews can cover quite a large number of people with relatively limited resources because they are quick and fairly cheap to administer , however , they still cannot match the potentially huge numbers reached by postal questionnaires
-structured interviews are suitable for gathering straightforward factual information such as a persons age or job
-the results are easily quantified because they are closed ended questions which makes them suitable for hypothesis testing
What is a study which used structured interviews ?
-Young and Willmott used structured interviews in their research into the extended family in east London
Do structured interviews generally have a high response rate - evidence from Young and willmott study to back this up ?
-structured interviews usually have a higher response rate compared to questionnaires
-for example , of the 987 people Young and Willmott approached for their main sample , only 54 refused to be interviewed
-this may be because it’s harder to turn down face to face requests
-the more people interviewed , increases the study’s representativeness and therefore easier to make generalisations
Are structured interviews seen as reliable , if so why ?
-Structured interviews are seen as reliable because its easy for the researcher to standardise and control them , they can ensure that each interview is conducted in precisely the same way , with the same questions , in the same order , with the same wording and tone of voice etc
-this will lead the same interview procedures to get very similar results , so we can compare answers easily and identify similarities and differences
Are structured interviews valid or not , if so why ?
-structured interviews are said to be not valid (provide a true picture ) , this is because they are said to like questionnaires produce a false picture of the subjects they are trying to study
-structured interviews usually use closed ended questions that restrict interviewees to choosing from a limited number of pre set answers . If none of these answers fit what the interviewee really wishes to say , the data obtained will be invalid
-structured interviews give interviewers very little freedom to explain questions or clarify misunderstandings . For example , the interviewer may be given one alternative form of words to use if the interviewee doesn’t understand the question , but if this fails to do the trick the interviewer has to move on to the next question
-people may lie or exaggerate , which means their responses produce false data
Are structured interviews flexible or inflexible , if so why ?
-structured interviews suffer from the inflexibility that comes from having to draw up the questions in advance
-in doing so , the researcher has already decided what is important - yet this may not coincide with what the interviewee thinks is important
-as a result , the findings may lack validity because they don’t reflect the interviewees concerns and priorities
-also structured interviews like questionnaires are merely snapshots taken at one moment in time , so they fail to capture the flowing dynamic nature of social life - unlike participant observation
What are feminist criticisms of structured interviews put forward by Graham ?
Graham argues that survey methods such as questionnaires and structured interviews are patriarchal and give a distorted , invalid picture of women’s experience , she argues that ;
-the researcher , not the female interviewee , is in control of the interview and decides the line of questioning to be followed , this mirrors women’s subordination in wider society
-survey methods treat women as isolated individuals rather than seeing them in the context of the power relationships that oppress them
-Surveys impose the researchers categories on women , making it difficult for them to express their experiences of oppression , thus concealing the unequal power relationships between the sexes
Advantages of unstructured interviews - rapport and sensitivity ?
-rapport and sensitivity - the informality of unstructured interviews allows the interviewer to develop a rapport (relationship of trust and understanding) with the interviewee , this is more likely to put the interviewee at ease and encourage them to open up compared to a formal structured interview
Advantages of unstructured interviews - rapport and sensitivity - what did Labov find the difference when using structured and formal interviews compared to using informal and unstructured interviews ?
-Labov , used formal interview techniques to study the language of black American children , Labov found that they appeared to be tongue tied and linguistically deprived
-however , by adopting a more relaxed , informal style - the interviewer sat on the floor and the child had a friend present - brought a completely different response . The child opened up and spoke freely , showing they were competent speakers
Advantages of unstructured interviews - rapport and sensitivity- how did Dobash and Dobash using unstructured interviews in their study help them ?
-unstructured interviews are particularly useful when researching sensitive topics
-for example , Dobash and Dobash used them to study domestic violence
-the empathy and encouragement of the interviewer will help the interviewee to feel comfortable discussing difficult or personal subjects such as abuse
Advantages of unstructured interviews - the interviewees view ?
-the interviewees view - because there are no set questions , unstructured interviews allow the interviewee more opportunity to speak about things they think are important.
-this contrasts with structured interviews , where the researcher decides in advance , what questions are worth asking and limits interviewees to a fixed range of possible answers
-by allowing the interviewees more freedom , an unstructured interview is more likely to produce fresh insights and valid data
Advantages of unstructured interviews - the interviewees view - what did Dean and Taylor -Gooby study and why was using unstructured interviews the Best method ?
-Dean and Taylor - Gooby used unstructured interviews lasting up to 90 minutes on the experiences of unemployment
-they believe this approach gave their interviewees the freedom to talk in their own terms about the issues that concern them
Advantages of unstructured interviews - checking understanding ?
-checking understanding - unstructured interviews make it much easier for the interviewer and interviewee to check each others meaning
-if the interviewee doesn’t understand a question , it can be explained
-similarly , if the interviewer is unsure what the interviewee means , follow up questions can be put to clarify matters
Advantages of unstructured interviews - flexibility ?
-flexibility - unstructured interviews are highly flexible
-the interviewer isn’t restricted to a fixed set of questions in advance , but can explore whatever seems interesting or relevant
Advantages of unstructured interviews -exploring unfamiliar topics ?
-exploring unfamiliar topics - with structured interviews , researchers need to have some knowledge of the subject and preferably a clear hypothesis before they start interviewing ,otherwise they will have little idea of what questions to ask
-however ,where the subject is one that we don’t yet know much about , unstructured interviews may be more useful because they use open ended questions which allow us to explore the topic
-like a conversation , we start by knowing nothing and then learn as we go along
-some sociologists sue unstructured interviews as a start point to develop their initial ideas about a topic before going to use more structured methods such as questionnaire