Topic 6 - Homicide (murder) Flashcards

(14 cards)

1
Q

Crimes Act s 6

A
  • infanticide
  • where a woman causes the death of her infant child under 2yrs in circumstances would amount to murder but where her mental state is disturbed by giving birth
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Crimes Act s 318

A

Culpable driving causing death
- accused’s driving must involve such a great falling short of the standard of care that a reasonable person would have exercised AND that there was a high risk that death or injury would follow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Sir Edward Coke definition of murder

A
  • of sound memory and of the age of discretion
  • unlawfully kills
  • any reasonable creature in being
  • under the King’s peace
  • with malice aforethought either express or implied by law
  • within a year and a day
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

He Kaw Teh (1985)

A

Voluntariness - ‘conscious control of bodily movement’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R v Schaeffer

A

voluntariness needs conduct to be ‘conscious, voluntary and deliberate’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Voluntariness cases

A
  • He Kaw Teh
  • Ugle
  • Whitfield
  • Ryan v R
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Causation cases

A
  • R v Hallett
  • Royall v R
  • R v Pagett
  • R v Blaue
  • R v Jordan
  • R v Smith
  • R v Evans and Gardiner (No 2)
  • R v Malcherek; R v Steel
  • Swan v The Queen
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Hallett

A
  • Def’s acts must be the substantive and operating cause of the victim’s death
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Royall v R

A
  • Where the conduct of the accused induces in the victim a well-founded apprehension of physical harm such to make it a natural/reasonable consequence that the victim would try escape, the injury is caused by the accused’s conduct
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Smith

A
  • If at the time of death the original wound is still the operating and substantial cause, the death can be attributed to be the result of the wound, albeit some other cause of death is also operating.
  • Only if the second cause is so overwhelming as to make the original wound merely part of the history can it be said the death doesn’t flow from the wound.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Swan v The Queen

A

The relevant causal link b/w an accused’s conduct and death can include pathways inv multiple steps, including decisions made by the victim, family members and doctors as to medical treatment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R v Crabbe

A
  • If a person does an act knowing it is PROBABLE that death/grievous bodily harm will occur, they are guilty of murder if death results. POSSIBILITY is not enough.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Transferred malice

A

If D shoots at V and hits and kills W instead, D is guilty of the murder of W (and the attempted murder of V)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Crimes Act s 3A

A

Unintentional killing in the course or furtherance of a crime of violence
- constructive/statutory murder
- broadly interpreted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly