tort Flashcards

(56 cards)

1
Q

What is the primary focus of the lecture on homelessness law and policy?

A

The legal context and framework for the test of ‘priority need’

The lecture outlines various parts including categories of priority need, non-vulnerability priority need categories, and the use of medical evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What significant change did the Homelessness Reduction Act 2017 introduce?

A

Extended help to all applicants, including those not in priority need

This act aimed to provide prevention and relief duties regardless of priority need status.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the ‘relief duty’ period for applicants who are homeless?

A

Up to 56 days

During this period, reasonable steps are taken to help secure suitable accommodation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Under which section does a local authority have a duty to provide immediate accommodation?

A

Section 188 Housing Act 1996

This duty arises if the applicant may be eligible, homeless, and in priority need.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

List the four elements required for a local authority to have a ‘full housing duty’ under section 193(2).

A
  • The person is ELIGIBLE for housing assistance
  • The person is HOMELESS
  • The person has PRIORITY NEED
  • The person is NOT INTENTIONALLY HOMELESS
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

True or False: The Homelessness Code of Guidance is a substitute for statutory law.

A

False

The Code is guidance, not law, but local authorities must have regard to it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What categories of individuals have a priority need for accommodation according to section 189 Housing Act 1996?

A
  • Pregnant women
  • Persons with dependent children
  • Vulnerable persons (old age, mental illness, disability)
  • Persons homeless due to emergencies
  • Victims of domestic abuse
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Fill in the blank: The priority need for accommodation includes persons aged _______ who are looked after children.

A

16 or 17

This is specified in the 2002 Order under para 3.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What constitutes vulnerability based on the categories linked to vulnerability?

A
  • Old age
  • Mental illness or handicap
  • Physical disability
  • Institutional backgrounds
  • Violence from another person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does the case law suggest about the comparison required to establish vulnerability?

A

Vulnerability is a comparative concept

It requires comparison with an ordinary person if made homeless, not an ordinary homeless person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the significance of the Supreme Court decision in Hotak regarding vulnerability?

A

Vulnerability linked to homelessness, considering characteristics and situation of the applicant

It emphasizes that resources of the local authority do not influence the vulnerability assessment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does ‘significantly more vulnerable’ mean in the context of homelessness?

A

The applicant suffers or is at risk of suffering harm or detriment that an ordinary person would not

This was clarified in the Panayiotou case, indicating a qualitative assessment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the role of local authorities when an applicant has no local connection?

A

They may refer the person to another local authority

This is part of the housing assistance duties outlined in the law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What happens if the applicant is homeless but not in priority need?

A

There is no ongoing duty from the local authority

This means the applicant may not receive further assistance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does the term ‘other special reason’ refer to in the context of priority need?

A

Conditions that make a person vulnerable beyond standard categories

This can include various personal circumstances that affect housing security.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What type of test does the court consider significant in determining vulnerability?

A

A qualitative test about relevance

The test assesses whether an applicant would suffer or be at risk of suffering harm or detriment that an ordinary person would not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the key question in assessing vulnerability according to the court?

A

Whether the applicant would suffer harm or detriment that makes a noticeable difference to their ability to deal with homelessness

This is based on characteristics defined in s.189(1)(c).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

How can third-party support affect an applicant’s vulnerability?

A

An otherwise vulnerable applicant might not be considered vulnerable if provided with consistent and predictable third-party care and support

This requires a contextual assessment of their physical and mental abilities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What must the decision regarding vulnerability be based on?

A

Evidence

The level of support needed to remove vulnerability may be unreasonably high.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What does the Equality Duty require in the context of vulnerability?

A

It requires a rigorous and open-minded assessment of the applicant’s disability and its effects

It should focus on whether the applicant is disabled, the extent of the disability, its likely effects when homeless, and resulting vulnerability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What must local authorities do regarding inquiries into an applicant’s situation?

A

Put issues to the applicant, focusing on the generality of adverse material

This is highlighted in cases like R. v Tower Hamlets LBC, Ex p. Rouf.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What role does an independent medical assessor play in vulnerability assessments?

A

They provide an independent evaluation of the applicant’s medical condition

This is supported by cases such as Hall v Wandsworth LBC.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What was the outcome of the case Guiste v The London Borough of Lambeth?

A

The local authority rejected the psychiatric report and relied on an opinion from medics who did not assess the applicant

This highlights issues regarding the reliance on medical opinions in vulnerability assessments.

24
Q

What is a critique regarding how homelessness claimants are categorized?

A

Claimants who do not conform to gender stereotypes face more scrutiny and risk of exclusion

This reflects a broader societal issue in handling homelessness.

25
What does vulnerability suggest about social protection?
It suggests a broadening of social protection while also serving as a gate-keeping function ## Footnote This requires technical, legal, and sometimes medical expertise for claims.
26
What is a significant legal reference regarding vulnerability assessments?
Hotak v Southwark LBC [2015] UKSC 30 ## Footnote This case is pivotal in understanding the legal framework around vulnerability.
27
Fill in the blank: The court held that vulnerability is assessed in a _____ way.
Qualitative ## Footnote This emphasizes the importance of relevance in assessing harm or detriment.
28
True or False: An applicant can still be considered vulnerable if third-party support is available.
True ## Footnote The availability of support does not automatically negate vulnerability.
29
What are the four focal points of the equality duty in assessing vulnerability?
* Whether the applicant is under a disability * The extent of such disability * The likely effect of the disability when homeless * Whether the applicant is as a result vulnerable ## Footnote These points guide the assessment process.
30
What should be considered when assessing the impact of medical evidence on vulnerability?
The context and the applicant's overall situation, rather than a purely clinical assessment ## Footnote This approach aligns with the need for practical assessments.
31
What is a potential issue with the test of 'vulnerable' after 1999?
The wrong test may have been applied, leading to injustices ## Footnote This highlights the importance of correct legal standards in vulnerability assessments.
32
What is psychiatric harm in tort law?
Psychiatric harm refers to mental injury or distress caused by the actions of another party.
33
True or False: Only physical injuries can be compensated in tort law.
False
34
What is the primary case that established the principle of 'nervous shock' in England?
Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police
35
Fill in the blank: The test for a claim of psychiatric harm typically requires a ________ relationship between the claimant and the event.
close
36
What is the 'secondary victim' in the context of psychiatric harm?
A secondary victim is someone who suffers psychiatric harm as a result of witnessing an event that causes injury to another person.
37
What are the three criteria established in Alcock for secondary victims to claim damages?
Proximity to the event, direct perception of the event, and a close relationship with the primary victim.
38
True or False: A claimant can recover for psychiatric harm without proving a physical injury.
True
39
What is the 'Eggshell Skull' rule in tort law?
The Eggshell Skull rule states that a defendant is liable for the full extent of a claimant's injury, even if the injury is more severe than what could have been foreseen.
40
What type of evidence is typically required to support a claim for psychiatric harm?
Medical evidence and expert testimony.
41
Name one leading case that addresses the issue of primary victims in psychiatric harm claims.
Page v Smith
42
In the context of psychiatric harm, what is meant by 'reasonable foreseeability'?
Reasonable foreseeability refers to whether a reasonable person could predict that their actions might cause psychiatric harm to another person.
43
True or False: A claimant must have a diagnosed psychiatric condition to claim for psychiatric harm.
False
44
What is the significance of the case 'Sion v Hampstead Health Authority' in psychiatric harm law?
It established that claims for psychiatric harm must show a recognizable psychiatric injury.
45
What is the 'control mechanism' in the context of psychiatric harm claims?
The control mechanism refers to the legal tests and limits imposed to prevent claims from being overly broad or indeterminate.
46
Fill in the blank: The term 'bystander' in psychiatric harm refers to someone who ________ an event but is not directly involved.
witnesses
47
What role does expert testimony play in psychiatric harm claims?
Expert testimony helps establish the presence and extent of psychiatric injury.
48
True or False: A claim for psychiatric harm can arise from a negligent act.
True
49
What is the 'factual causation' requirement in tort law for psychiatric harm?
Factual causation requires showing that the defendant's actions were a direct cause of the claimant's psychiatric harm.
50
What does the term 'nervous shock' refer to in the context of psychiatric harm?
Nervous shock refers to the psychological injury suffered by a claimant due to a traumatic event.
51
Name a potential defense against a claim of psychiatric harm.
Contributory negligence.
52
In the context of psychiatric harm, what is a 'primary victim'?
A primary victim is someone who is directly involved in the traumatic event and suffers psychiatric harm as a result.
53
What case established the 'reasonable person' standard in determining liability for psychiatric harm?
Bourhill v Young
54
True or False: Emotional distress claims are always considered psychiatric harm claims.
False
55
What is the significance of the 'foreseeability test' in psychiatric harm claims?
It determines whether the defendant could have reasonably predicted that their actions would cause psychiatric harm.
56
What are the implications of the case 'Mcloughlin v O'Brian' for secondary victims?
It broadened the scope for secondary victims to claim damages for psychiatric harm.