Tort of Negligence Flashcards

(30 cards)

1
Q

What three parts must be established and satisfied to bring about a claim of negligence?

A

Show a duty of care, show that there was a breach of that duty and that the breach caused damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Which case can be used if the duty given is already an established one?

A

Robinson v CC of West Yorkshire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

If a duty needs to be a established, which test must we use to do this?

A

Caparo v Dickman three stage test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is meant by ‘reasonable foresight’?

A

Is it reasonably foreseeable that the Ds act or emission will injure the claimant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Which case demonstrates reasonable foresight?

A

Kent v Griffiths

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is meant by proximity and what does this include?

A

Is there a closeness between the two parties, this can include space, time or relationship (a manufacturer and consumer is a close relationship)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which case shows that there was no proximity between the C and D?

A

Bourhill v Young

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is meant by is it fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty?

A

Not fair to impose duty on emergency services because they can be drained of their resources and open the floodgates of litigation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What case can we use to show where it is not fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty?

A

Hill v CCWY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What test is used to established a breach and how is this described?

A

Reasonable man test, if they failed to do something a reasonable man would do, or does something a reasonable man would not do in the same situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What case does the reasonable man test come from?

A

Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks Co

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Give two examples of individual characteristics that would not be taken into account due to the test being objective

A

Learners and juniors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the two exceptions of individual characteristics that are taken into account?

A

Skilled/professional defendants (compared to those in the same job) and children (Judged by the same age)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Give a case that can be used for learners

A

Nettleship v Weston

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Give a case that can be used for juniors

A

Wilsher v Essex Health Authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Give a case that can be used to demonstrate skilled/professional defendants as individual characteristics

17
Q

Give a case that can be used to demonstrate being a child as an individual characteristic

A

Mullin v Richards

18
Q

What two risk factors will increase the standard of care?

A

Likelihood of injury and risk of serious injury

19
Q

What two risk factors will decrease the standard of care?

A

Importance of Ds activity and the cost of eliminating the risk

20
Q

What is meant by likelihood of injury and what is the case for this?

A

The more likely an injury the more care that should be taken, case of Bolton v Stone

21
Q

What is meant by risk of serious injury and what case can be used for this?

A

If there is a risk of serious injury because of the Cs personal characteristic care must increase, case of Paris v Stepney Borough Council

22
Q

What is meant by the importance of Ds activity and what is the case for this?

A

If the D is saving a life or an emergency service care will decrease and more careless behaviour is allowed, case of Watt v HCC

23
Q

What is meant by the cost of eliminating the risk and what is the case for this?

A

The D does not have to go above and beyond or ‘break the bank’ to reduce a risk, only expected to do what the reasonable man would, case of Latimer v AEC Ltd

24
Q

What is the but for test and which case illustrates this?

A

But for the breach of duty, C wouldn’t have suffered injury or damage when they did, Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington HMC

25
When will an intervening act break the chain of causation and what is the case for this?
When the act is unforeseeable, Scott v Shepard
26
What is meant by multiple causes and what is the case for this?
C must prove D actually caused damage or materially contributed, Wilsher v Essex Health Authority
27
What is meant by remoteness of damage?
Type of damage must be an expected outcome from the Ds breach, must not be too remote
28
What case illustrates remoteness of damage?
Wagon Mound
29
What case illustrates that the type of damage is what matters and not how it happened (sequence of events)?
Hughes v Lord Advocate
30
What is meant by the thin skull test and which case demonstrates this?
The D must take the C as they find them, regardless of it damage is more serious due to something unusual about the C, Smith v Leech Brain & Co