Tort Remedies Flashcards
(38 cards)
Balancing of Hardships
- Courts will consider all facts related to the matter and their impact, positive or negative.
- Must be gross disparity between defendant’s detriment and plaintiff’s benefit:
Example: Tear down whole house because one inch of it was on plaintiff’s property - Even then no balancing of the hardships if the defendant’s conduct was willful.
- If it’s just negligence and we decide to balance the hardships in whole or in part consider awarding money damages. If we deny injunction to defendant we need to at least give plaintiff money damages.
- Hardship to the public is also taken into account.
Hardships must balance in favor of party granting the preliminary injunction. Irreparable harm requires showing that the harm will occur while waiting for a full trail and therefore plaintiff needs relief now.
Erroneous injunction
Parties subject to an erroneous injunction must obey it until it is modified or ends.
Contempt
Disobeying a court order comes with penalties.
Civil: Used to coerce defendant into obeying the order. This may include fines, and/or imprisonment for lack of payment. If the defendant is imprisoned then they remain incarcerated until they pay the fines.
Criminal: Used to punish defendants. This may include fines, and/or imprisonment. The Constitution protects against overly long sentences.
Injunction Defenses (Tort)
Unclean Hands
Relative Hardship
Contrary to Public Interest
Repetition Unlikely
Impossibility
Interference with Free speech
Erroneous injunction
Laches
Injunctions Against Criminal Prosecution
Criminal Acts (Except Public Nuisance)
Relative Hardship
Despite a proper showing in other respects of right to injunctive aid, if a plaintiff is merely seeking to protect a technical and unsubstantial right, and the issuance of the injunction will bring no actual advantage, it may be refused if it will result in hardship.
Contrary to Public Interest or Statute
Injunctive relief may be denied if the act complained of is found to be in the public interest. As a rule, unless a statute is unconstitutional, injunctive relief will not issue to prevent the execution of a public statute or enforcement of a public statute by law enforcement officers.
Unclean Hands
The plaintiff’s inequitable or improper conduct related to the lawsuit will cut of its right to equitable relief against a defendant.
Impossibility - Injunctive Relief Defense
Carrying out the terms of the injunction is impossible
Erroneous Injunction
Injunction would no longer be granted because law or facts changed.
Laches
An unreasonable delay by the plaintiff in initiating his or her equitable claim that results in prejudice to the defendant. Time starts when plaintiff knows of the injury.
If applicable still consider money damages.
Laches is never greater than the statue of limitations
Repetition Unlikely
An injunction will not issue when, because of a change in circumstance, a repetition of the act complained of is unlikely. Thus, unless evidence shows that the wrongful conduct will probably recur, injunctive relief will be denied if the defendant has voluntarily discontinued the activity.
All Legal Remedies (list)
Money Damages
- Compensatory damages
- General Damages
- Special Damages
- Nominal Damages
- Punitive Damages
*Duty to Mitigate
Compensatory Damages
An award of money damages based on the loss or injury to the plaintiff and are intended to put the plaintiff in the position she/he would have been in if the injury had not occurred. Requires:
1) Causation: Tortious activity caused the injury
2) Foreseeability: Injury must have been foreseeable at the time of the tortious act
3) Unavoidable: Plaintiff could not have avoided the injury. Must take REASONABLE steps to avoid or minimize the damages
4) Certainty: Damages cannot be too speculative.
“Certainty” - Compensatory damages
Damages cannot be too speculative.
- Plaintiff must establish past losses with more certainty than future losses
- Plaintiff must show future losses are more likely to happen than not.
- A historical record helps to provide certainty.
All or nothing rule - Compensatory damages
If future losses are more likely to happen than not then they are awarded, otherwise they cannot be recovered.
General Damages
Non-economic losses to compensate for injuries or losses that a reasonable person would foresee could result from the wrongful conduct.
Basic certainty required - need not be specifically pleaded. Jury can award any amount subject to proper instructions
Special Damages
These are economic loses. Basic certainty rules do not apply and must be specifically pleaded. Calculation for special damages must be made with sufficient certainty.
Nominal Damages
Are awarded even though plaintiff has no actual injury to establish or to vindicate the plaintiff’s rights.
Punitive Damages
Awarded to punish the defendant for willful, wanton or malicious conduct. Must first be awarded other money damages.
Requires:
1) Defendant’s conduct must be reprehensible.
2) Must be a disparity between the actual or potential harm suffered by the plaintiff and the punitive award
3) Defendant’s fault must exceed negligence
4) Damages must be awarded in an amount relatively proportionate to actual damages. Punitive damages that are excessively high to be a violation under the Due Process Clause and has limited Punitive Damages to ten times the amount of compensatory damages (unless conduct facts are extreme).
Outline:
Reprehensible Conduct
Disparity between actual or potential harm and the punitive award
Fault exceeds negligence
Damages Relatively proportional
Difference between the elements of a TRO and a Preliminary Injunction
PI does not require a showing of immediate harm; only a showing that the harm is likely to occur if an injunction is not granted during the pendency of the action.
Injunction
When the defendant is ordered to do something (mandatory injunction) or refrain from doing something (a prohibitory injunction). It is almost always coupled with damages.
There are three types: Permanent, Preliminary, and Temporary restraining order
Permanent Injunction
The defendant is ordered to do something (mandatory) or is ordered to refrain from doing something (prohibitory). It is almost always coupled with damages incurred in time period prior to obtaining injunction.
1) Legal Remedy Alternatives are inadequate
2) Existence of a property right
3) feasibility of enforcing the injunction
4) balancing hardships.
** If conduct is willful then no balancing required
Restitution Damages
Defendant should not be unjustly enriched and should not have wrongfully obtained a benefit.
Damages are based on the benefit to the defendant, as judged by the value to the defendant.
Tip: damages is based on harm but restitution is based on benefit
Waiver of Tort and Suit in Assumpsit
An action whereby a tortfeasor has benefited by their wrong and the plaintiff brings an action for restitution, waiving the tort, because the plaintiff cannot get both compensatory and restitutionary damages.
Plaintiff can get punitive damages IF the underlying cause is a tort.
Discuss compensatory damages and Resitutionary damages and suggest P pick the one with the most return in value.
