Torts 1 Flashcards
(31 cards)
Intent
Intentional acts are acts done for the purpose of causing or with knowledge with a reasonable certainty that it will cause the result producing the injury
TRANSFERRED INTENT
Arises when D acts with the intent to commit a given tort but:
a. commits original tort against a different person than intended.
b. commits a different tort than intended against original person.
c. commits a different tort against a different person than intended.
ASSAULT
The intentional act causing a reasonable apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact.
BATTERY
The intentional infliction of harmful or offensive bodily contact.
FALSE IMPRISONMENT
The intentional confinement or restraint of a person to a bounded area by threats, by assertion of legal authority, or by actual physical restraint.
DEFENSE - Shopkeeper’s Privilege
A shopkeeper may detain a suspect in a reasonable manner for a reasonable time to investigate the ownership of property when the shopkeeper has a reasonable belief that there has been a theft.
Trespass to Land
The intentional act causing invasion or entry onto P’s land, without permission
Trespass to Chattel
The intentional, unauthorized interference with the chattel of another causing damage.
Conversion
The substantial interference with the personal property of another causing deprivation of possession.
The remedy and measure of damages for conversion is a full value.
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED)
The intentional or reckless infliction of severe emotional or mental distress by extreme and outrageous conduct.
Defense - Consent
The defense to intentional torts where it is informed, voluntary and given with legal capacity.
Self-Defense
A person may use reasonable force to prevent threatened harmful or offensive bodily conduct, including deadly force, if threatened with death or serious bodily harm.
Defense of Others
A person may use reasonable force to protect the safety of others.
Defense of Property
A person may use reasonable force to protect his own property or the property of another, but deadly force cannot be used.
Recapture of Chattel
A person may enter a wrongdoer’s land to recover chattel and may use reasonable force, but deadly force is not permitted. A person may enter the land of a third party to recover chattel at a reasonable time and peaceful manner.
Privilege of Arrest
Proper execution of a valid warrant is a defense against intentional torts. Reasonable force may be used for such arrest.
Defense - Necessity
A person has a privilege to harm the property of another where necessary to prevent great harm to third persons or to defendant himself. Private necessity requires that compensation be paid for actual damage to property. Public necessity does not.
Nuisance
A private nuisance is an unreasonable and substantial interference with another’s use or enjoyment of his land. A plaintiff must demonstrate a possessory interest in the land.
A public nuisance is an unreasonable interference with the plaintiff’s use of public resources. A plaintiff must demonstrate that the harm to the plaintiff differs from the harm to the general public.
Remedies for nuisance include damages or injunctions.
DEFAMATION
A false statement of material fact of or about the plaintiff published to another party causing damage to plaintiff’s reputation.
Defamatory Statement
Oral Defamation is slander. Slander per se includes: morally reprehensible criminal behavior, loathsome disease, inability to conduct business or professional activities, or sexual misconduct.
Libel is written or printed defamation. Libel per se includes: morally reprehensible criminal behavior, loathsome disease, inability to conduct business or professional activities, or sexual misconduct.
Publication
Publication occurs when the defamatory statement is seen or heard by someone other than the plaintiff.
Damages (Defamation)
Damages for defamation include injury to reputation and are presumed if the defamation involves libel or slander per se; otherwise special damages are required.
Constitutional Issues
Under New York Times v. Sullivan, a plaintiff who is a public official or public figure must prove actual malice and falsity. A public figure is one who injects himself into the public arena.
Under Gertz, a private figure in a matter of public concern must show at least negligence, but must show actual malice if seeking punitive damages.
Actual Malice
Actual malice means that the statements were made with knowledge or reckless disregard of their truth or falsity.