Torts Flashcards
(41 cards)
Intentional Torts
Transferred Intent
The intent to harm one party can be transferred when the D had the intent to commit a tort against one particular person, but instead
1. commits a different tort against that person, or
2. another person is injured.
Intentional Torts
Battery
A D is liable for Battery when there is
1. an intentional,
2. harmful or offensive contact,
3. with the plaintiff’s person (including anything connected to the P).
Intentional Torts
Assault
A D is liable for Assault when there is
1. an intentional act,
2. that causes the P to be placed in reasonable apprehension,
3. of imminent harmful or offensive contact with the plaintiff’s person.
Intentional Torts
False Imprisonment
A D is liable for False Imprisonment when he
1. intentionally acts,
2. to restrain P to fixed boundaries, and
3. the P is aware of the confinement or is harmed by it.
Intentional Torts
Trespass to Land
- A D is liable for Trespass to Land when he
1. intentionally,
2. either
(a) enters the land of another,
(b) causes an object or a third person to enter the land,
(c) remains on the land, or
(d) fails to remove an object from the land. - Intent to trespass is not required; the only intent required is that the D intended to enter/remain on the subject land.
- Intangible Entry (gas, pollution, noise) is not sufficient for a trespass to land claim.
Intentional Torts
(Nominal Damages)
Battery - Trespass to Land
A claim may be supported by nominal damages; P need not suffer actual damages.
Intentional Torts
Trespass to Chattels & Conversion
- A D is liable for Trespass to Chattels when he
1. intentionally
2. interferes with another’s personal property, and
3. the amount of damage is small. - A D is liable for Conversion if the amount of interference is substantial.
- Mistaken ownership of the property is not a defense to either tort.
Intentional Torts
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
A D is liable for IIED if:
1. the D acted intentionally or recklessly,
2. the D’s conduct was extreme and outrageous,
3. the D’s act caused extreme emotional distress (causation), and
4. the P actually suffered severe emotional distress (damages).
Intentional Tort Defense(s)
Consent
Consent is a defense to intentional torts, and may be express or implied through words or conduct.
Negligence
Negligence Elements
A prima facie case for negligence requires:
1. duty (a duty of due care),
2. breach (a breach of that duty),
3. causation, and
4. damages
Negligence
To Whom a Duty is Owed
- Under the Andrews view, a duty of care is owed to all foreseeable Ps.
- Under the Cardozo view, a duty of care is only owed to foreseeable Ps who are within the zone of danger.
Negligence
Affirmative Duty to Act
Generally, there is no duty to act affirmatively, unless:
(a) a pre-existing relationship exists between the parties (i.e. parent-child, landowner-entrant),
(b) the D put the P in peril, or
(c) the D has already undertaken to rescue the P.
Negligence
General Standard of Care
- General standard of care is that of reasonable prudent person (RPP). An RPP takes appropriate measures to avoid foreseeable risks.
- Following community customs and statutory requirements may be relevant as to what conduct is reasonable, but are not dispositive.
Negligence
Standard of Care (Children)
- Children must act as a hypothetical child of similar age, experience, and intelligence.
- If a child is engaged in an adult activity, the child has a duty to act as a reasonable adult.
Negligence
Standard of Care (Medical Doctors)
- A medical doctor is held to the degree of care and skill of the average qualified practitioner.
- A doctor has a duty to obtain informed consent from his patient before treatment.
Negligence
Standard of Care (Land Owner)
What duty of care is owed by a landowner or possessor is determined by the type of entrant.
- Undiscovered Trespasser: No duty is owed by the landowner.
-
Anticipated Trespasser: The landowner must:
1. exercise reasonable care in operations on the property, and
2. warn of (or make safe) highly dangerous artificial conditions that the landowner knows of. -
Licensee (social guest): The landowner must:
1. exercise reasonable care in operations on the property, and
2. warn of (or make safe) dangerous conditions that are known to the landowner but not apparent to a guest. - Invitee (enters for the owner’s benefit, shop or business): The landowner owes all the duties he would to a licensee. In addition, the landowner has a duty to make reasonable inspections of the property to find and make safe non-obvious dangerous conditions.
Negligence
Negligence Per Se
- Under the doctrine of negligence per se, the elements of duty and breach are established when the D breaches the statute.
- To use negligence per se, P must show that
1. the statute’s purpose is to prevent the type of harm that the P has suffered, and
2. the P is in the class of persons the statute seeks to protect.
Negligence
Causation
- A P must show that the D’s conduct was both the actual and proximate cause of the injurry.
- Actual cause is the “but for” cause - but for D’s negligence, P would not have been injured.
- Proximate cause is the legal cause, which means that the injury must have been foreseeable result of the breach.
Negligence
Intervening Causes
- Any act that occurs after the D’s breach that contributes to the harm is an intervening cause.
- Intervening causes that are dependent on (a natural reaction to) the D’s wrongful acts are usually foreseeable.
- If the intervening cause resulted in an unexpected injury, it is usually deemed unforeseeable, and the D is not liable.
- Intervening medical malpractice is always deemed foreseeable. Intervening criminal acts are usually not foreseeable.
- A negligent tortfeasor who causes the initial injury is usually liable for increased harm caused by others providing aid.
Negligence
Eggshell Plaintiff Rule
The Eggshell Plaintiff Rule means that a tortfeasor takes his victim as he finds him. Thus, a D is liable for all harm a P suffers from a pre-existing mental or physical condition that makes the harm worse than what a normal person might suffer.
Defenses to Negligence Claims
Assumption of Risk
- Assumption of risk is a defense to negligence, and applies if the P voluntarily assumed a known risk. It may be expressed or implied.
- A professional rescuer or firefighter assumes the risk of injury related to the job.
Defenses to Negligence Claims
Comparative & Contributory Negligence
- Under pure comparative negligence (majority), the P’s negligence or assumption of risk will reduce his recoverable damages by the percentage of his own fault.
- In a contributory negligence jurisdiction, a P cannot recover damages if he contributed to his own injury.
Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress (NIED)
- Two major scenarios where a P may recover for NIED are: (1) zone-of-danger claim, and (2) bystander claim.
- Prima facie case of a zone-of-danger claim is:
1. the D’s negligence,
2. creates a foreseeable risk of physical injury,
3. the P is in the zone of danger, and
4. the P manifests physical symptoms. - Prima facie case of a bystander claim is:
1. the D’s negligence,
2. the P is a contemporaneous witness to a bodily injury inflicted on the P’s close family member, and
3. the P manifests physical symptoms.
Vicarious Liability
Vicarious Liability (Employer)
- An employer is vicariously liable for an employee’s negligent acts if the employee was acting within the scope of employment (performing work assigned by the employer, or engaging in a course of conduct subject to the employer’s control).
- An employee’s intentional torts are genereally not within the scope of employment.