Torts Flashcards

(31 cards)

1
Q

How do you establish a prima facie case for an intentional tort,

A

A plaintiff generally must prove:
1. Voluntary Act. The defendant’s actions must be voluntary (e.g., not a reflex).
2. Intent. The defendant must have specific or general intent.
3. Causation. Causation is satisfied if the defendant’s conduct was a substantial factor in bringing about the harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When establishing a prima facie case for an intentional tort how is specific and general intent satisfied.

A

a. Specific Intent. An actor has specific intent when the actor acts with the purpose of causing the consequence.
b. General Intent. An actor has general intent when the actor knows that the consequence is substantially certain to occur.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When does a battery occur

A

A battery occurs when the defendant:
1. Causes or is a substantial factor in bringing about;
2. Harmful or offensive contact;
3. To the plaintiff’s person; AND
4. Has specific or general intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When does an assault occur

A

An assault occurs when the defendant:
1. Causes or is a substantial factor in bringing about;
2. Reasonable apprehension in the plaintiff;
3. Of imminent harmful or offensive bodily contact to
the plaintiff’s person; AND
4. Has specific or general intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When does false imprisonment occur

A

When the defendant:
1. Causes or is a substantial factor in bringing about;
2. The confinement of the plaintiff within fixed
boundaries (the plaintiff must be aware of the
confinement or harmed by it); AND
3. Has specific or general intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When does INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS occur

A

When the defendant:
1. Acts with extreme or outrageous conduct;
2. Which causes or is a substantial factor in bringing
about;
3. Severe emotional distress; AND
4. Has intent to cause severe emotional distress or acts
with recklessness as to the risk of causing severe emotional distress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When does tresspass to land occur

A

when the
defendant
1. Causes or is a substantial factor in bringing about;
2. A physical invasion of the plaintiff’s real property;
AND
3. Has specific or general intent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When does Trespass to Chattel Occur

A

When the defendant:
1. Causes or is a substantial factor in bringing about; 2. An interference with the plaintiff’s right of
possession in a chattel; AND 3. Has specific or general intent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When does conversion occur

A

A conversion occurs when the defendant:
1. Causes or is a substantial factor in bringing about;
2. An interference with the plaintiff’s right of
possession in a chattel;
3. Where the interference is so serious, it deprives the
plaintiff entirely of the use of the chattel; AND
4. Has specific or general intent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the defenses to intentional torts

A

Consent, Self Defense, Necessity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are intentional torts

A

BAFTTEC: Battery, Assault, False Imprisonment, Intentional Infliction Of Emotional Distress, Trespass to Land, Trespass to Chattels, and Conversion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What estbalishes consent as a defense to an intentional tort

A

if:
1. The consent was valid (e.g., no fraud, incapacity, etc.); AND
2. The defendant’s conduct remained within the boundaries of the plaintiff’s consent (e.g., cannot use a knife in a boxing match).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What estbalishes self-defense as a defense to an intentional tort

A

if:
1. The defendant reasonably believed that that the plaintiff was going to harm him or another; AND
2. The defendant used only the amount of force that was reasonably necessary and proportionate to protect himself or another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What estbalishes Necessity as a defense to an intentional tort

A

The defense of necessity is available to a defendant who enters onto the plaintiff’s land or interferes with the plaintiff’s personal property when the defendant does so to prevent an injury or some other severe harm. Under private necessity (the defendant’s act is done to benefit a limited number of people), the defendant must pay for the actual damages that he caused. However, the landowner may not use force to exclude the defendant. Under public necessity (the defendant’s act is done for the public good), the defendant is not liable for property damage that he caused.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the elements of a case for negligence

A
  1. The defendant owed a duty to the plaintiff to conform to a specific standard of care; 2.
    The defendant breached that duty;
  2. The breach was the actual and proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injuries; AND
  3. The plaintiff sustained actual damages or loss.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Who is a duty of care owed to

A

A duty of care is owed to all foreseeable plaintiffs that may be harmed by the defendant’s breach of the applicable standard of care. There are two separate views:
1. Under the majority view (Cardozo), the defendant is only liable to plaintiffs within the foreseeable zone of danger.
2. Under the minority view (Andrews), the defendant owes a duty to everyone harmed.

17
Q

When does a duty to act arise

A

If 1. Places the plaintiff in danger;
2. Has a special relationship with the plaintiff (e.g.,
common carrier/passenger, innkeeper/guest, family
members, etc.);
3. Has a duty to act affirmatively imposed by law; OR
4. Begins to administer aid or attempt to rescue the
plaintiff.

18
Q

What is the reasonable personstandard of care

A

It is the default standard of care. It should be applied unless a special standard of care applies (e.g., children, professionals, physicians, landowners, negligence per se, etc.). The standard of care the defendant owes to the plaintiff is that of a reasonably prudent person under the circumstances as measured by an objective standard. Physical disabilities may be taken into account.

19
Q

What is the standard of care for children

A

Children are held to the standard of care of a reasonably prudent child of similar age, experience, and intelligence under the circumstances (more subjective). However, if the child is engaged in an adult activity, the court will not take the child’s age into account

20
Q

What is the standard of care for Professionals

A

A professional (e.g., nurses, lawyers, accountants, engineers, architects, etc.) is expected to exhibit the knowledge and skills of a member of the profession in good standing in similar communities.

21
Q

What is the standard of care for Physicians

A

Physicians are held to a national standard of care and have a duty to disclose the risks of treatment to enable a patient to give informed consent. This duty is only breached if an undisclosed risk was so serious that a reasonable person in the patient’s position would not have consented upon learning of the risk.

22
Q

What is the standard of care for Psychotherapists

A

In the majority of states, psychotherapists have a duty to warn potential victims of a patient’s serious threats of harm if the patient has the apparent intent and ability to carry out such threats and the potential victim is readily identifiable.

23
Q

What is the standard of care for landowners

A

The standard of care that landowners owe to entrants upon their land varies depending on the entrant’s status.

24
Q

What standard of care does a landlord owe to a Discovered/Anticipated trespasser

A

It is discovered or anticipated that trespassers enter the land without consent, but may be expected by the landowner. The landowner owes a duty to discovered/anticipated trespassers to warn of (or make safe) hidden dangers on the land that pose a risk of death or serious bodily harm (only applies to artificial conditions that the landowner is aware of).

25
What standard of care does a landlord owe to a undiscovered trespasser
Undiscovered trespassers enter the land without consent, and are not expected by the landowner. The landowner owes no duty to undiscovered trespassers.
26
What standard of care does a landlord owe to a licensees
A licensee is a person who lawfully enters the landowner’s property for her own purpose or benefit, rather than for the landowner’s benefit (e.g., social guests). The landowner has no duty to inspect his property for licensees. However, the landowner does owe a duty to licensees to warn of (or make safe) hidden dangers on the land that pose an unreasonable risk of harm (applies to both artificial + natural conditions that the landowner is aware of).
27
What standard of care does a landlord owe to a Invitees
An invitee is a person who is invited on the property for the owner’s own benefit or mutual benefit with the invitee (e.g., a customer shopping in a store that is open to the public). The landowner owes a duty to the invitee to reasonably inspect the land for hidden dangers (artificial or natural) that pose an unreasonable risk of harm, and if discovered, make them safe.
28
Under the attractive nuisance doctrine what duty is owed by a landowner towards child trespassers
A landowner owes a duty to child trespassers to warn of (or make safe) artificial conditions on the land, provided that: 1. The artificial condition exists in a place where the landowner knows or has reason to know that children are likely to trespass; 2. The landowner knows or has reason to know that the artificial condition poses an unreasonable risk of death or serious bodily harm; 3. The children, due to their age, do not appreciate the danger involved; AND 4. The risk of harm outweighs the expense of making the condition safe.
29
When a statute imposes upon any person a specific duty for the benefit or protection of others, how will a violation of the statute constitute negligence per se
if the plaintiff: 1. Is in the class of people meant to be protected by the statute; AND 2. Suffers the type of harm the statute was designed to protect against.
30
30