Torts Flashcards

(92 cards)

1
Q

Intentional Torts [Three Elements]

A
  1. Act
  2. Intent
  3. Causation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Intent

A

Acts with purpose of cause consequence, or knows consequence is substantially certain.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Transferred Intent

A

Intent to cause tort or a tort can be transferred to different person and/or tort.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Battery

A
  1. Harmful or offensive contact
  2. Causes injury pain or illness
  3. OR is offensive to person of ordinary sensibility
  4. Must intend the contact
  5. Can recover nominal damages
  6. No battery if there is consent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Assault

A
  1. Reasonable apprehension of imminent harm
  2. Intends to cause apprehension or contact
  3. Plaintiff must be aware, must be reasonable
  4. Imminent, no substantial delay
  5. More than mere words
  6. Can recover nominal damages
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress

A
  1. Intend to cause distress or act with recklessness
  2. Engage in extreme and outrageous conduct that causes the distress
  3. Must be cause of harm
  4. Prove damages beyond distress an ordinary person would endure
  • Exception for public figures, must show false statement made with actual malice (recklessness of knowledge of falsity)
  • hypersensitivity only a factor if P was aware of it

Can end up causing harm to third parties. If bystander requires actual physical harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

False Imprisonment

A
  1. confine or restrain within fixed boundaries
  2. Plaintiff is aware OR harmed
  3. can be through physical barriers, restraint, or threat. Or failure to provide reasonable means to escape where there is duty
  4. Intent or knowing
  5. Can recover nominal damages
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Defenses to Intentional Torts

A
  1. Consent
  2. Self-defense
  3. Defense of Others
  4. Defense of Property
  5. Parental Discipline
  6. Privilege of Arrest
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Consent

A

Express consent: words or actions, willingness to submit to conduct

Implied consent: silent where silence can reasonably construed of consent. i.e. emergencies, injury, mutual consent to combat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Self-defense

A

Use of reasonable force - proportionate to defend against harm

Generally, no duty to retreat in modern states.

Not liable for accidental injury to bystanders absent negligence.

May use reasonable force in defense of others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Defense of Property

A

Reasonable force if necessary to prevent tortious harm.

May never use deadly force.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Citizen Arrest

A

Must know felony has been committed and reasonably believe person is perp.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Tresspass to Chattel

A
  1. disposses, use, interfere or damage chatell
  2. Intend act
  3. Only actual damages
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Tresspass to land

A
  1. physical invasion of land
  2. intent to enter land
  3. no actual damages required
  4. Necessity as defense to trespass, still liable for actual damages in private necessity.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Private Nuisance

A

substantially and unreasonably interferes with use and enjoyment

annoying to ordinary, reasonable person.

Defense: regulatory compliance, coming to the nuisance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Public Nuisance

A

Unreasonable interference with public as a whole. Private plaintiff must show special or unique harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Elements of Negligence

A
  1. Duty
  2. Breach
  3. Causation
  4. Damages
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Is there a duty

A

Duty of care to those who may be foreseeably harmed by conduct.

No affirmative duty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Scope of Duty

A

Foreseeability of Harm & Foreseeability of Plaintiff

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Standard of Care

A

Reasonably prudent person under the circumstances - Objective standard.

Presumed to have average mental abilities

Intoxication not considered unless involuntary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Standard of Care [children]

A

modified standard to reasonable child of similar age, unless child is engaged in high-risk adult activity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Standard of Care [tresspasser]

A

Refrain from willful, wanton, intentional, or reckless misconduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Attractive nuisance doctrine

A
  1. artificial condition where knows children are likley to trespass
  2. condition poses unreasonable risk of death or harm
  3. children do not discover or cannot appreciate danger
  4. slight utility of maintaining compared to risk of injury
  5. fails to exercise reasonable care
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Standard of Care [licensee]

A

Must make reasonably safe and/or warn of concealed dangers. No duty to inspect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Standard of Care [invitees]
owes duty of reasonable care, to inspect, discover dangerous conditions, and protect from them. Non-delegable duty
26
Breach of Duty
Reasonable Person Standard or B
27
Breach for Professionals
evidence of custom admissible, dispositive
28
Breach for Physicians
1. modern trend to national standard 2. patients must give consent and docs. must explain risks unless: a. risks are commonly known b. patient is unconcious c. patient waives/refuses the information d. patient is incompetent; or e. would be harmed by disclsoure
29
Breach of statutes
negligence per se 1. law imposes duty 2. vioaltes statute 3. P in class intended to be protected by law 4. accident type of harm sought to be avoided by law 5. harm was caused by violation of statute. -can excuse/rebut if complying with statue was more dangerous than violating or compliance was impossible
30
Res ipsa Loquitur
In some cases, circumstantial evidence can be enough. 1. accident is type that does not normally occur without negligence 2. was caused by something within exclusive control of D 3. was not due to any negligence by P
31
Res Ipsa modern trends
1. Med Mal. hold all D's jointly & severably liable 2. Products liability, will often ignore exclusivity requriements 3. comparative-fault - many loosely apply third element
32
Causation
Cause in fact, actual cause | Proximate Cuase, legal cause
33
Cause in fact
But for test
34
Substantial factor Test
when multople factors make actual cause difficult, can apply subtantial factor test.
35
Loss of chance
In case of disease where death is more likely than not, D can recover loss of chance
36
Proximate cause
Is injury within scope of breach/ | 1. Foreseeability of harm
37
superseding cause
cause that breaks the chain of causation
38
Intervening cause
does not break the chain of causation
39
Compensatory Damages
Make plaintiff whole again. Can include "parasitic damages": of emotional distress associated with physical injury Generally i)medical expense, ii)earning capactiy, iii) pain and suffering difference in market value for property
40
Collateral Source Rule
Traditionally do not account for outside payments, generally shifting to modify in a way that avoids double recovery
41
Punitive damages
may be available if D was willful, reckless, wanton, ,or with malice
42
Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress
Needs either: 1. zone of danger and caused distress 2. Bystander: i) cloesely related, ii) present, iii) personally observed. 3. Negigent medical info or mishandling of a corpse - Most require some physical manifestation
43
Wrongful Death
brough by a spouse or rep. to cover losses suffered by spouse or rep.
44
Survivial Action
brough on behalf of decedent for claims that would have been available at death
45
Vicarious liability
Held liable for another persons negligece
46
Respondeat Superior
Employer held vicariously liable for acts that are within the scope of employment Does not generally include intentional torts
47
Scope of employment
Detour: minor deviation, employer still liable Frolic: major deviation, employer no longer liable
48
Independent Contractors
Employer generally not liable unless employer retains control or non-delegable
49
Non-delegable duties
1. inherently dangerous 2. duties to public or specific people for certain work 3. shopkeepers
50
Other liability
1. biz partners if within scope of biz 2. Auto owners, negligent entrustment, family purpose, owner liability -General rule is parents not liable for children's torts
51
Dram shop laws
Bar owners, bartenders, and social hosts liable when caused person to drink to much and injured third-parties.
52
Govt. Immunity
generally immune, has been waived, Federal Tort Claims Act. Generally, discretionary govt. functions not waived, but ministerial functions is waived.
53
Firefighters Rule
An emergency proffesional is barred from recovering for the negligence if the injury is from an inherent risk of the job.
54
Joint and Several Liability
two or more defendants are each liable for a single and indivisible harm to the plaintiff for the entire harm. 1. two or more tortfeasors 2. Tortfeasoers acting in consert 3. Employer and employee are liable 4. Res Ipsa for mulitple d's
55
Contributory Negligence
completely bars the palintiff's recovery
56
Last Clear Chance Doctrine
Allows a negligent plaintiff to recover upon showing that defendant had the last clear chance to avoid injuring plaintiff
57
Comparative fault
Not a complete bar to recovery, but limits recovery.
58
Modifiend comparative negligence
P is more at fault than D, then P's recovery is barred
59
Assumption of the Risk
Analogous to consent, Applies when party knowingly and willingly embraces a risk for some purpose of their own
60
Express Assumption of Risk
Waiver, if clear and enforcable No reckless or wanton conduct or gross disparity of bargaining power.
61
Strict Liability
1. Abnormally dangerous activiies, 2. Wild animals 3. Defective products
62
Abnormally Dangerous Activity
1. Creates a foreseeable and highly signifiant risk of harm 2. Severity of harm resulting from activity 3. Appropriateness of activity 4. Value to activity
63
Wild Animals
species or class not cutsomarily kept in the service of humankind. Liable for dangerous propensity
64
Domestic Animals
liable if has reason to know animal has dangerous propensity
65
Strict Products Liability
1. manufacturing defects 2. design defects 3. failure to warn
66
Elements of SPL claim
1. defective product 2. defect existed when left D's control 3. Injury from defect when product used in a foreseeable way
67
Manufacturing Defect
Product deviated from Intended Design | Does not conform to Manufacturers own specs
68
Design Defect
Consumer Expectation Test - defective if less safe than ordinary consumer would expect Risk-Utility Test - product is defective in design if risks outweigh benefits, must show that there is reasonable alternative design
69
failure to Warn
Of foreseeable risk no obvious to ordinary user
70
Learned intermediary
Drug maker may warn physician only unless drug is marketed directly to consumers
71
Implied Warranty of Merchantability
1. Suitable for the Ordinary Purpose for which it is sold
72
Implied Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose
Seller nows particular purpose, and buyer relies on seller's skill or judgment
73
Defamation
1. defamatory statement 2. concerning plaintiff 3. published to third party who understood nature 4. damage to P's reputation
74
Public Figure Defamtation
kew or acted with reckless disregard that statement was false. Actual Malice Standard
75
Private person defamation
must prove statement is fales and that person was negligent with respect to falsehood. not a matter of public concern
76
Libel
written, printed, or recorded statement
77
Slander
spoken statment
78
absolute privilege release from defemation
1. judicial proceeding 2. legislative proceeding 3. between spouses 4. if required by publications on TV etc.
79
Conditional privilage from defamtion
Good faith statement made to some duty or responsibility
80
Intrusion Upon Seclusion
intrudes upon private affairs in manner objectionable to a reasonable person
81
False LIght
1. make public facts about P 2. That place p in false light 3. which would be highly offensive to reasonable person
82
Appropriation of Right to Publicity
1. another's name or likeness 2. for the D's advantage 3. without consent 4. causes injury
83
Public Disclsoure of private Facts
1. publicses matter concerning private life of another 2. Highly offense to reasonable person 3. Not of legitimate concern to public
84
Intentional Misrepresentation
1. False representation 2. Scienter 3. Intent to induce reliance 4. Causation 5. Justifiable Reliance 6. Damages
85
Negligent Misrepesntation
1. false infor 2. resulting from negligence 3. during course of bus 4. causing justifiable relaince 5. in contractual relationhp or limited group for whose benefit info is supplied
86
Intentional INterference with a Contract
1. valid K 2. D knew of K 3. D intentionaly interfered resulting in breach 4. Breach caused damages -d's conduct must exceed the bounds of free competition and expression
87
Interference with a Prospective Economic Advantage
D intentionally interferes with relaitionph or benefit absent a contract, otherwise same elements
88
Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
1. P has info generally known 2. P has taken reasonable precaustions to protect 3. D acquires secret by improper means
89
Trade Libel
1. Publication 2. Of false or derogatory statement 3. With Malice 4. Relating to P's title, business, wuality of biz, or products 5. causing special damages as result of interefernce or damage iwth relationship
90
Slander of Title
1. Publication 2. Of a false statement 3. Derogatory to P's title 4. with malice 5. causing special damages 6. diminsh value in eyes of 3rd party
91
Malicous PRosecution
intentionally and malicously institutes or pursues a legal action for an improper prupose, without probable cause, and aciton is dismissd in favor of D
92
Abuse of Process
Sets inmotion legal proceeding but has abused it for some alterior motive. Must also cause damages