Torts Flashcards

1
Q

Transferred Intent Doctrine

A

D is liable for whatever results from intended act, regardless of whether intended the result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

List of Intentional Torts

A
Battery
Assault
False Imprisonment
IIED
Trespass to Land
Trespass to Chattels
Conversion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Battery Elements

A

(1) Harmful or offensive contact to P’s person

  • Harmful = physical injury
  • Offensive = unpermitted to person of ordinary sensitivity
  • Person includes anything holding/touching/connected to
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Assault Elements

A

(1) Places P in reasonable apprehension of (2) immediate battery

  • Apprehension = knowledge; apparent ability creates reasonable apprehension (“unloaded gun”)
  • Immediacy = conduct; words INsufficient
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

False Imprisonment Elements

A

(1) Act of restraint (2) confining P to a bounded area

  • Act - threats are sufficient; failure to act can be act if preexisting duty; P must be aware of OR harmed by it
  • Bounded area - Not bounded if reasonable means of escape P can reasonably discover
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

IIED Elements

A

D (1) engages in outrageous conduct, (2) intentionally, recklessly, or w utter disregard to P’s emotional tranquility, (3) causing P severe emotional distress

  • Outrageous conduct - Insults insufficient; repeated things like debt collection; acts by common carriers/innkeepers; P belonging to fragile class; targeting KNOWN emotional weakness
  • Severe emotional distress - No specific evidence needed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Trespass to Land Elements

A

(1) Act of physical invasion (2) of P’s land

  • Act - Physical entry on land by person OR tangible/physical object
  • Land - Includes air above+soil below
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Trespass to Chattels Elements

A

(1) Slight interference with chattels (vandalism)

* Mistake of ownership NOT a defense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Conversion Elements

A

(1) Great interference with chattels (theft)

  • Special remedy - Not just cost of repair, but full market value
  • Mistake of ownership NOT a defense
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Affirmative Defenses to Intentional Torts

A

Consent
Protective privileges (self-defense, defense of others, defense of property)
Necessity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Consent Defense

A

P (w capacity) consented

  • Express consent
  • Implied consent by: (1) custom and usage, OR (2) D’s reasonable interpretation of P’s objective conduct
  • Defense to ALL intentional torts
  • Void if obtained through fraud/durress
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Protective Privileges Defenses

A

Self defense, defense of others, defense of property

  • Threat must be in progress or imminent
  • D must have reasonable belief that threat is genuine
  • Force must be proportionate; deadly force not allowed for defense of property
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Necessity Defenses

A
  • Public necessity - Protecting community/group of ppl
  • Private necessity - Protecting D’s interest from catastrophe
  • Private necessity only a partial defense; must pay compensatory damages
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Negligence Elements

A

(1) Duty, (2) Breach, (3) Causation, (4) Harm/damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

To Whom a Duty Is Owed

A

“Foreseeable victims”, like those in the “zone of danger”

  • Rescuer exception - Rescuer can sue for damages if comes to the scene and gets hurt
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Default Standard of Care

A

Reasonably prudent person acting under similar circumstances

  • Exceptions: (1) Superior skill/knowledge, (2) D’s physical characteristics may be relevant
17
Q

6 Special Duty Standards

A
Children
Professionals
Premises liability cases
Statutory standards of care
Duties to act affirmatively
NIED
18
Q

Children Standard of Care

A

No duty for <5 yo; >=5 yo must behave like children of similar age, experience, and intelligence under similar circumstances

  • Adult activity exception
19
Q

Professionals Standard of Care

A

Care of an average member of the same profession providing similar professional services (“custom”)

  • Informed Consent doctrine - Doctors must disclose risks of treatment
20
Q

Premises Liability Standards of Care

A

(1) Unknown trespasser - No duty
(2) Known/anticipated trespasser - Known, man-made death traps
(3) Licensee (enter w permission, but don’t enrich) - All known traps
(4) Invitee (enter w permission to enrich OR enter a public space) - All reasonably knowable traps

  • Firefighters/police officers - Can’t recover if injuries are from inherent risks of job
  • Trespassing kids/attractive nuisance doctrine
  • Satisfy by repairing or giving warning
21
Q

Statutory Standards of Care

A

Apply a criminal statute if (1) designed to protect P’s class of ppl, AND (2) designed to prevent type of injury

  • AKA “negligence per se”
  • Exceptions: (1) If compliance would’ve been more dangerous than violation, (2) If compliance was impossible
22
Q

Duties to Act Affirmatively

A

NO such duties

  • Exceptions: (1) Pre-existing (legal) relationship, (2) D caused the danger
  • If you act even tho no duty, liable if you negligently fuck it up
23
Q

NIED

A

(1) Establish duty under another negligence standard
(2) If no physical injury:
(a) Near-miss - P (1) was in zone of danger, AND (2) emotional distress had physical manifestations
(b) Bystander - (1) P and victim were close family members, AND (2) P witness injury in real time
(c) Business relationship - E.g. patients/labs, funeral parlor/customers

24
Q

Breach

A
  • Showing fact+reason
  • Res ispa loquitor - Requires (1) accident is a type normally associated w negligence, AND (2) accident of this type would normally be due to negligence of someone in D’s position/D had control over injury-causing item at time
25
Types of Causation
Actual cause/cause-in-fact | Proximate cause
26
Actual Cause
* Default = But-for test (Was the breach necessary for producing the injury?) * Merged cause scenarios - Substantial factor test (Did each contribute in a substantial way? If one was capable, both were substantial factors) * Unascertainable cause - Burden shifts to Ds
27
Proximate Cause
Foreseeability of harm/fairness of liability * 4 foreseeable/liable outcomes: (1) Intervening negligent medical treatment (2) Intervening negligent rescue (3) Intervening protection/reaction forces (4) Subsequent disease or accident
28
Eggshell Skull Doctrine
P recovers for all harm suffered, even if it's surprisingly great in scope * Applies to ALL torts
29
Comparative Negligence Defense
P failed to exercise proper care for his own safety * Proper care - Could be of a reasonably prudent person; could be from a self-protecting statute * Default/pure - Assign damages based on blame % * Modified/partial - If P is >50% to blame, no damages
30
Strict Liability Categories
Animals Abnormally Dangerous Activities Products
31
Strict Liability for Animals
Strict liability for (1) wild animals, regardless of safety precautions, and (2) domestic animals with known vicious propensities
32
Strict Liability for Abnormally Dangerous Activities
Must be (1) foreseeable risk of serious harm even w reasonable care, AND (2) uncommon in area where it's being conducted
33
Strict Liability for Products
(1) D is a merchant, AND (2) product is defective, AND (3) product wasn't altered since left D's hands, AND (4) at time of injury, P was making a foreseeable (not necessarily proper) use of product * Merchant - Includes upstream entities and commercial lessors; EXCLUDES casual sellers and service providers * Manufacturing defect - Product differs from others coming off the line * Design defect - Costs of the design outweigh its benefits such that a reasonable merchant wouldn't put it on the market; show an alternative design that is (1) safer, (2) economically feasible, AND (3) practical * Information defect - Failure to adequately warn of unavoidable risk that isn't obvious *Presumption that product not altered if has moved in ordinary channels of distribution
34
Comparative Responsibility Defense to Strict Liability
If D can prove P was careless/reckless, recovery is reduced
35
Nuisance
Unreasonable interference with P's ability to use and enjoy property * Balancing of interests tests
36
Vicarious Liability
* Employer-employee - Employer liable if tort committed within scope of employment; intentional torts outside scope unless job involves use of force * Hiring party/independent contractor - No vicarious liability, unless IC works on your property and hurts your customers * Car owner/driver - No vicarious liability, unless owner asks driver to do something * Parent/child - No vicarious liability
37
Loss of Consortium
Spouses always have separate claim when partner is injured * Recover for: (1) Loss of household services (2) Loss of society/companionship (3) Loss of sex