Torts (Part 1 of 2) Flashcards

1
Q

Where are torts found in the statutes?

A

Nowhere. Case law only.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is respondeat superior?

A

Superior responds for EE’s harm if:
Acting within the scope, i.e., to serve the ER.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What statute waived sovereign immunity?

A

FS 768.28

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When is EE personally liable?

A
Torts
-----------
No EE personally sued will be driving a BMW
-----------
When acted 
(1)  Bad faith, 
(2) Malicious purpose, &
(3) Wanton & willful disregard of human rts, safety or property
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the requirement of wanton & willful?

A

Knew or shd have known injury wd result & disregarded the foreseeable injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
TORTS
-----------
NOC for 3 categories of torts
---
Where send?
---
S/L
A
TORTS
-----------
NOC:
-A-  6 mos = contribut.
-B-  2 yrs med mal./wrong death
-C-  3 yrs = torts
---
to DFS UNLESS county, muni or FL Space
------------
2 yrs = med mal/wrong death
4 yrs for all torts (intentional or unintent) + oral Ks.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How is a claim of negligent hiring or negligent retention specifically different from other tort claims?

A

ER is liable for EE acts outside scope of work.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How do negligent hiring/retention claims contradict FS 768.28?

A

~focus on the bad actor’s acts, not the supervisor~

FS 768.28 specifically exempts ER liability if EE acting outside course & scope of employment.

Here - crappy EE is acting outside his employment & ER is liable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What’s the principal difference between negligent hiring & negligent retaining?

A
Neg. Hiring/Retention
-----------
When the ER knew or shd have known.
• Hiring - beforehand via investigation.
• Retention - afterward see unfit.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What 6 things must a Negligent Hiring Plaintiff show?

A

Neg. Hiring

(1) ER owed duty to PL to use reas care in hiring.
(2) Inappropriate investigation.
(3) Appropriate investigation wd show unsuitable.
(4) PL injured by EE’s independent wrongful act.
(5) Independent wrongful act was foreseeable in light of the unsuitability.
(6) ER’s unreasonable failure to investigate is legal cause of PL’s injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What level of care must be exercised by ER in hiring?

A

The care a reasonably prudent person would exercise in choosing or retaining an EE for those duties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

When is it required for ER to contact LEO for a criminal history?

A

Never, even if job has heavy contact w/ public.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What must an ER balance in hiring?

A

Cost of investigation vs. likeliness of discovery.
Nature of duties (ex. inside citizen’s home) vs. opportunity for harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

State the 6 elements of negligent retention claim.

A

Duty …… to Retain …… Shd …… unreas fail to Prevent …… Harm …… Foreseeably …… Caused.

(1) Duty to use reas care in retaining.
(2) Knew or shd known of unfitness.
(3) Unreasonably failed to prevent foreseeable harm.
(4) Harm by EE’s independent wrongful act.
(5) Act was foreseeable in light of the unfitness.
(6) ER’s unreasonable failure to take corrective action is legal cause of PL’s injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What must ER balance in retaining?

A

Seriousness of unfitness known.
Likelihood of harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the 3 defenses to negligent retention?

A

Neg. Retention

(1) No notice.
(2) Reas steps taken.
(3) EE’s wrongful act not foreseeable based on ER’s notice.

17
Q

State the difference b/w assault & battery.

A

Battery = harmful or offensive contact.
Assault = threat to cause such a contact.

18
Q

State the 4 elements of assault.

A

Assault

(1) Intentional
(2) Threat of bodily injury to another
(3) Creating fear of imminent peril
(4) Apparent present ability for Def to carry out threat.

19
Q

What intent is needed for assault?

A
Assault
-----------
Intentional b/c know act will cz harm.
-----------
Like battery, no hostility required.
Intent found if result was substantially certain to follow from Def's person's actions.
20
Q

Must each of the 4 elements be present to establish assault?

A

Assault - IT Fears yr Ability
Ass calls CIA / / / an Ass calls you FATI
———–
Yes. Ex. If PL not in fear, no assault.
———–
(1) Intentional
(2) Threat of bodily injury to another
(3) Creating fear of imminent peril
(4) Apparent present ability for Def to carry out threat.

21
Q

State the 3 elements of battery.

A
Battery
-----------
~a Reasonable Person wd believe that the Bat is Substantially Certain to Result in Harm to PL's ball.
-----------
(1)  Intentional infliction of
(2)  Harmful or offensive contact
(3)  Upon the person of PL.
22
Q

What level of intent required?

A
Battery
-----------
Same as assault.
•  Reasonable person would believe the act is
•  Substantially certain to result in 
•  Harm or offense to PL.
---
~a Reasonable Person wd believe that the Bat is Substantially Certain to Result in Harm to PL's ball.
23
Q

Assault & battery are intentional torts. So how is LG held liable?

A
Assault/Battery
-----------
If act performed:
(1)   Within scope of employment &
(2)  Not in bad faith, maliciously or w/ willful/wanton disregard of PL's rights.
-----------
Ex.  While protecting ER's property.
24
Q

Could punitive damages be recovered?

A
Assault/Battery
-----------
Yes.
Why?  Malice.
Evidence of intentional assault & battery w/o justification = evidence of malice.
25
Q

What is NOT a tort & doesn’t fall under sov imm waiver.

A

Retaliatory discharge b/c that is a statutory claim.
———–
State of FL, Dept. of Elder Affairs v. Caldwell, 199 So. 3d 1107 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)