Treatment Modalities (studies) Flashcards
(28 cards)
Beck et al, 1979
development of group in 1970s when WW2
Free, 2007
staff shortages necessitated the development of groups
Beck et al 1979
TR is important for effectiveness of therapy
Bennett-Levy et al (2010a)
o Group decreases the contact time with therapist reduces chances for TR with practitioner
Yalom (1995)
– nine other factors that influence change within group therapy o Installation of hope o Universality o Imparting information o Altruism o Interpersonal learning o Development of socialising techniques o Imitative behaviour o Group cohesion o Catharsis
Rachael et al (2010)
Universality is important – meeting with other people who are also attending the class due to their mental health has a powerful normalising effect, confronted with the fact that they are not unique problems but rather are commonplace.
White (2010b)
groups of up to 160 ptps, necessitates greater distance between practitioner and client = lower TR. Dilutes knowledge of the client’s situation and progress.
Richardson et al 2010
- increasing evidence for relational aspect within materials
Gilbert and Leahy, 2007
Practitioner dance coach between materials and client
Lovell (2010)
send info about practitioner
Richards and Whyte (2011),
first appt face to face
Lovell (2010)
long pauses explained
Webb (2014)
different nature of alliance, distance alliance.
Kitchiner et al, (2009)
only 12% of ptps attended all sessions.
Macrodimitris et al (2011)
lower than usual dropout – inclusion of process where those who missed a session were contacted afterward. Groups run at various times to enable inclusiveness as possible e.g. evening to accommodate working people. End punctually as attendees may have arranged to be collected or have buses to catch.
Hambridge et al (2009),
females drop out more, could be due to use of more male-orientated metaphors, should be balance between inclusivity and specificity.
Papworth and Marrinan, 2018
Telephone working Less stigmatising
Dalgard (2006)
depression 69%/56% recovery, scores remaining stable at follow up.
Bains et al (2014)
GAD in older adults, 26% recovery rate.
Kearns et al, 2010
Successful PEGs involve a relapse prevention focus.
o Reunion groups/follow up groups – less deterioration after treatment ended.
Erickson et al, 2007
- Overloading participants with too much info = reduced benefit
Papworth and Marrinan, 2018
o Clients are often given info with a strong evidence base behind them to increase engagement and motivation
NICE, 2009
PEGS are not recommended in the NICE guidelines for treatment of depression
NICE, 2011b (1)
or Panic disorder