treatment of aphasia Flashcards

(39 cards)

1
Q

purpose of treatment

A
  • facilitate brain-based recovery via restitutive approaches
  • help compensate for language impairments via compensatory approaches
  • support people psychologically and socially
  • encourage fullest life participation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

best level of complexity for treatment

A
  • traditionally, begin at easy complexity and progressively build
  • Complexity Account of Treatment Efficacy (CATE): using more complex stimuli/tasks may optimize recovery
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

list of general approaches to social and life participation

A
  • Life Participation Approach to Aphasia (LPAA)
  • Living with Aphasia: Framework for Outcome Measures (A-FROM) and ICF Models
  • supported communication
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Life Participation Approach to Aphasia (LPAA)

A
  • puts life at the enter of decision making
  • recognizes that communication problems affect interpersonal bonds and all aspects of life
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Living With Aphasia: Framework for Outcome Measures (A-FROM) and ICF Models

A
  • conceptualizes intervention outcomes based on ICF framework
  • considers four interrelated life-affecting impacts of aphasia
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

supported communication

A
  • philosophy and set of tenets and strategies
  • welcomes anything that improves access to participation in community events
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

list of specific treatment methods of life participation models

A
  • Total Communication Approaches
  • Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Total Communication Approaches

A
  • encourage any means of communication to convey and receive information
  • no particular modality is required
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC)

A
  • Participation Model of AAC helps to breakdown access and opportunity barriers to AAC use
  • Visual Scene Displays (VSDs) are contextually rich pictures depicting situations relevant to person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

partner and caregiver training

A
  • Reciprocal Scaffolding: person with aphasia serves as expert or teacher, which empowers person with language disorder through a teaching role
  • Communication Partner Scheme
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

list of compensatory treatment approaches

A
  • Promoting Aphasic’s Communicative Effectiveness (PACE)
  • Communicative Drawing Program (CDP)
  • Back to Drawing Board (BDB)
  • Visual Action Therapy (VAT)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Promoting Aphasic’s Communicative Effectiveness (PACE)

A
  • compensatory approach
  • works on communication goals t the level of conversation via any modality chosen by the speaker
  • clinician and client are both speaker and listener at different points, take turns describing set of stimulus cards
  • research continues to be needed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Communicative Drawing Program

A
  • compensatory approach using drawing
  • drawing is non-linguistic, facilitating word retrieval using right hemisphere
  • teaches to draw in hierarchical steps
  • research is needed for carefully controlled studies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Back to Drawing Board (BDB)

A
  • intended for severe aphasia to promote alternate communication modality
  • same principles as CDP
  • learning how to draw humorous cartoon panels from memory
  • research is limited
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Visual Action Therapy (VAT)

A
  • gesture-based non-vocal approach
  • promotes symbolic gestures to communicate, working in a system of three phases
  • research is little
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

list of specific approaches for expressive language therapy

A
  • Constraint-Induced Language Therapy (CILD)
  • Script Training
  • Melodic Intonation Therapy (MIT)
  • Voluntary Control of Involuntary Utterances (VCIU)
  • Response Elaboration Training (RET)
  • Treatment for Aphasic Perseveration (TAP)
17
Q

Constraint-Induced Language Therapy (CILD)

A
  • restitutive approach, as they’re restricted to only using impaired modalities
  • requires intense practice utilizing only verbal expression
  • tasks are focused on verbal expression with a cueing heirarchy
  • research continues to be needed in milder cases and larger groups
18
Q

Script Training

A
  • client practices with personally relevant scripts generated with SLP
  • impairment focused, but also fits within social-participation model
  • repetitive practice of pre-established personally relevant scripts
  • discuss goals, generate scripts, practice reading, give homework, practice in social context, practice with new partners
  • research is limited with adequate sample sizes
19
Q

Melodic Intonation Therapy (MIT)

A
  • facilitates spoken language through exaggeration of prosody, pitch, stress
  • taps into melodic and prosodic control of intact right hemisphere
  • restitutive in fostering brain changes to enhance speech output, but also compensatory in person using melody to facilitate speech
  • hierarchical steps for implementation and teaching of rhythm and process
  • research shows positive outcomes, but quality of studies is weak
20
Q

Voluntary Control of Involuntary Utterances (VCIU)

A
  • to improve expressive output in those limited to automatic speech
  • chaining automatic speech to be purposeful
  • research is limited
21
Q

Response Elaboration Training

A
  • to increase length and improve content with nonfluent aphasias
  • client is primary communicator with clinician cueing for more information, building upon utterances, and connecting utterances o the client
  • reduced clinician control over stimuli
  • no direct feedback on client’s utterances
  • research is limited to mainly case studies
22
Q

Treatment or Aphasic Perseveration (TAP)

A
  • impairment-level approach designed for those with perseveration
  • goal is to reduce perseveration and enhance naming
  • research is poorly based
23
Q

list of specific approaches for improving word finding and lexical processing

A
  • Cueing Hierarchies for Treatment of Anomia
  • Semantic Feature Analysis (SFA)
  • Phonological Components Analysis (PCA)
  • Verb Network Strengthening Treatment (VNeST)
  • Verb as Core (VAC)
24
Q

Cueing Hierarchies for Treatment of Anomia

A
  • systematically presenting cues to optimize naming success
  • research is strong for therapy, with limited generalization
25
Semantic Feature Analysis (SFA)
- to enhance naming by improving access to semantic networks - restitutive approach at impairment-level, but also compensatory by teaching client to cue themselves - beginning with most relevant words, work through semantic categories of target word before attempting to name - research is limited in participant numbers and poor treatment fidelity
26
Phonological Component Analysis (PCA)
- like SFA, but for phonemic qualities of a word rather than semantic associations - research is needed with more participants and carryover
27
Verb Network Strengthening Treatment (VNeST)
- improve word retrieval through enhanced activation of relational aspects of verbs - help client generalize ability to produce verbs within sentences to carryover - select 10 verbs w low accuracy, build upon knowledge - research is limited
28
Verb as Core (VAC)
- intended to improve verb use and understanding language performance in those with agrammatism - present verbs, create SVO sentences, start at lower accuracy and build up, switch a t certain criterion - research is studies of small numbers with no carryover
29
list of specific approaches for improving syntax
- Treatment of Underlying Forms (TUF) - Mapping Therapy - Sentence Production Program for Aphasia (SPAA)
30
Treatment of Underlying Forms (TUF)
- to treat agrammatism by improving comprehension/expression of sentence structure - focus is on developing meta-linguistic awareness of role of parts of speech - hierarchy of creating sentences - research is lacking in studies with larger groups
31
Mapping Therapy
- treat deficits in thematic role assignment in agrammatism - takes apart and reorganizes structure of sentences - analyzing grammatical roles of nouns/verbs and identifying semantic/thematic roles in sentences - research is limited to small studies
32
Sentence Production Program for Aphasia (SPAA)
- stimulation approach to enhance sentence - hierarchy of eight sentence types, each with two levels of grammatical complexity - research is limited
33
list of specific approaches for improving reading and writing
- Copy and Recall Treatment (CART) - Anagram and Copy Treatment (ACT) - Problem Solving Approach - Multiple Oral Reading (MOR) - Oral Reading for Language in Aphasia (ORLA)
34
Copy and Recall Treatment (CART)
- impairment-focused method improving writing through delayed-copy treatment - need visual recognition and ability to write letters - restitutive and compensatory - repeated copying of words from pictures, eventually copying from memory, with homework program for copying - research is limited
35
Anagram and Copy Treatment (ACT)
- for those with dyslexia w/ difficulty at level of graphemic output - developing relevant words for client and writing from memory - research is limited to small sample sizes
36
Problem Solving Approach
- teaching client with dysgraphia to implement strategies that facilitate spelling - client writes something, then corrects it, continuing to practice and keep lists of what strategies were helpful/what was difficult - research is limited to one study
37
Multiple Oral Reading (MOR)
- repeated reading aloud of same text to teach whole-word reading, rather than letter-by-letter reading - research is limited with no evidence in larger groups
38
Oral Reading for Language in Aphasia (ORLA)
- for those with acquired dyslexia/aphasia of any severity/form - to foster recovery of reading comprehension through phonemic/semantic routes - hierarchical reading of material of connected speech based on length-reading level - research is needed in larger groups
39
cueing hierarchy
- semantic cue - something you drink from - graphemic cue - starts with a "c" - phonemic cue - starts with /k/ - rhyme - rhymes with pup - sentence completion - you drink from a... - sentence completion + phonemic cue - you drink from a /k/... - delayed imitation - the word is cup. you drink from a... - direct imitation - the word is cup. say cup