Treatment of patients with class II malocclusion Flashcards
(32 cards)
Class II incisors
Lower incisor occludes behind upper incisor cingulum plateau
Class II division I incisors
Proclined upper incisors
Class II division II incisors
Retroclined upper incisors
Skeletal pattern
Main limiting factor in class II treatments
-most important factor in aetiology and prognosis
Assess the face
Local and dental factors must be planned for
Growing patient
- ->functional appliance
- ->orthodontic camouflage
Non growing patient
- ->orthodontic camouflage
- ->orthognathic surgery
Treatment of overjets
Straight wire appliance is poor at reducing overjets
A functional appliance is excellent at reducing overjets
Functional appliance treatment
Activators -mild non-crowded cases Twin block appliance -severe cases -crowded cases
Medium opening activator
Leaves space for eruption of molars to move upwards and forwards
Twin blocks
2 piece functional appliance
-upper bite block
-lower bite block
7-8mm inclined plane
Anchorage
Control of unwanted tooth movement
Anchorage requires careful planning
Loss of anchorage will result in lack of occlusion in buccal segments and residual overjet in class II case
Indications for distal movement of upper buccal segments
Well-aligned lower arch
Half-unit class II molars
Co-operative patient
Non-compliance appliances
Pendulum appliance
Distal jet
Aetiology
Usually some degree of antero-posterior discrepancy (i.e. class II skeletal pattern)
–>main limiting factor in successful tx
Local/ dental factors superimposed which need to be planned for
Treatment options
Accept mild overjet
-pt’s appearance may be quite acceptable
Removable appliances - used far less nowadays
Fixed appliances - cannot correct skeletal discrepancy
Functional appliances - either on their own or before fixed appliances
Orthognathic surgery - for a severe class II in non-growing patient
Treatment for moderate to severe class II skeletal pattern
Best to use functional appliances in young patient (possibly followed by fixed appliances)
Best to use orthognathic surgery in non-growing patient
Simple removable appliances or complex fixed appliances may result in unacceptable retroclination of upper incisors
-poor profile
-poor functional occlusion
Treatment for mild class II
Accept skeletal pattern
- removable appliances
- fixed appliances
Orthodontic camouflage for class II
Approaches to class II treatment where skeletal pattern is to be accepted
Orthodontic camouflage for class II: no lower arch crowding and class I molars
Non-extraction treatment Anchorage reinforcement -headgear -palatal arches -implants -class II elastics
Orthodontic camouflage for class II: no lower arch crowding and 1/2 unit class II molars
Non-extraction - distal movement -bringing upper molar back to class I Extraction U7s - distal movement Extraction upper premolars -upper molar to full unit class II -mid palatal implant, mainscrew implant
Orthodontic camouflage for class II: no lower arch crowding and full unit class II molars
Upper premolar extractions
Orthodontic camouflage for class II: lower arch crowding and class I molars
Upper and lower extractions (upper 4s and lower 5s)
Orthodontic camouflage for class II: lower arch crowding and 1/2 unit class II molars
Upper and lower extractions - need to correct molar relationship
- upper and lower first premolars
- upper and lower second premolars
Orthodontic camouflage for class II: lower arch crowding and full unit class II molars
Very difficult case - avoid in general practice Upper and lower extractions Severe anchorage problems -the molars must be changed to class I Could consider extracting 4 upper teeth