Trespass Flashcards
(13 cards)
Jural Correlatives
Right - duty
Privilege - no right
Power - liability
Immunity - disability
Types of arguments
fairness, utility, institutional, administrability
Trespass Opposing Interests
Freedom to exclude v. freedom of access
Trespass Majority Rule
people have the right to exclude someone for any reason (or for no reason at all)
Exception: discrimination
Exception: special obligations on innkeepers and common carriers
Trespass Minority rule
When property owners open their premises to the general public in the pursuit of their own property interests, they have no right to exclude people unreasonably (Uston – casino)
Reasonable reasons to exclude: people who disrupt the regular operations of the premise, threaten the security of the premises and its occupants, disorderly people, or dangerous people
Common Law Defenses to Trespass
- The entry is done w/ the consent;
- The entry is justified by the necessity to prevent a more serious harm; or
- The entry is otherwise encouraged by public policy
Jacques v. Steenberg Homes – trailer case
Private landowner’s right to exclude is one of the most essential parts of property ownership, & right is hollow if legal system doesn’t protect it
Tenants have a privilege to welcome visitors
Once you’ve invited a person in for the purpose of them using the property as their residence, you have conceited some of the right to exclude
Discrimination
Federal Public Accommodations Statute (Section 2000a of the Civil Rights Act of 1964): the P must prove D:
- Committed discrimination;
- On the ground of one of the protected categories (race, religion, or national origin);
- In access to a “place of public accommodation”
Justifications offered for special obligations on innkeepers & common carriers:
- More likely to be monopolies, so denial of service could deny the ability to travel / find a place to sleep away from home
- Provide necessities & denial would place individuals at risk from the elements / bandits on the highway
- Hold themselves out as ready to serve public & public relies on this representation
To constitute a “place of public accommodation,” a business must
- Fit into the list of facilities named (or implied? – inn, hotel, motel, or any other establishment with provides lodging; food service providers; retail establishment; gas station; a place of exhibition or entertainment);
- “Serve the public” and not constitute a “private establishment…not in fact open to the public;” AND
- Either “affect commerce” or be “supported by state action.”
Argument for businesses to have the right to exclude:
Businesses are not going to exercise the right to exclude unreasonably (their point is to make money)
Counter: if their only motivation is $ & the customers want a certain class of people excluded, maybe business would abide by what the customers want (so maybe they would exercise the right to exclude)