Tribunals, Inquiries & Ombudsmen Flashcards

(19 cards)

1
Q

What are the principles of good as per Parliamentary and Health Services Ombudsman 2009

A

Getting it right
Being customer focused
Being open & accountable
Acting fairly and proportionally
Seeking continuous improvement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is an ombudsman

A

A means by which individuals are able to raise their grievances about the way their situation has been addressed by the state without going to court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the 4 routes to redress - forms of administrative justice

A

Judicial review
Tribunals
Complaints
Ombudsmen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the process of an ombudsman investigating an issue

A

Can the ombudsman investigate - Was it duly made, time frame, by person effected etc.
Are there other remedies available
Did maladministration occur
Has public body accepted the findings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is maladministration

A

“Bias, neglect, inattention, delay, incompetence and so on” - The Crossman Catalogue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the MP filter

A

Individuals don’t have direct access to the ombudsman. They complain in writing to their MP who refers it to them.

This maintains role of MP as champion of constituents & holding Gov to account

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What remedies can an ombudsman provide

A

Make recommendations
Make special report to Parliament

But Gov has final say

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the Debt of Honour case

A

In 2000, UK government announced WWII compensation scheme for ‘British’ civilians interned by the Japanese

Initial announcement suggested broad eligibility

Clarification later limited eligibility to those born in the UK or with a UK-born
parent/grandparent

Claim based on legitimate expectation doctrine

Court of Appeal ruled against claimants: announcement was too unclear to create a legitimate expectation

Government’s conduct found to be lawful

Complaint made to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO)
* Investigation found maladministration due to initial announcement’s lack of clarity
* Concluded injustice was caused to complainants
* Recommended government review scheme & reconsider affected individuals

  • Government refused Ombudsman’s recommendations
  • Ombudsman escalated by reporting to Parliament
  • Public Administration Select Committee criticised government’s stance
  • Government ultimately agreed to review the scheme

Ombudsman found maladministration despite court ruling government conduct lawful
Ombudsman’s recommendations are non-binding but politically influential

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a tribunal

A

Hear appeal against specific decision & decide what the result should be. More expert & appropriate that courts, but right of appeal must be created

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the 3 appellate bodies

A

Internal - Heard by same body as first hearing. Quick & simple
Courts - Lack of expertise & simple
Specialist body - Independent, expert
Tribunals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are some of the chambers of the 1st tier of tribunals

A

Social entitlement
Immigration & asylum
Health, Education & social care
Tax
Property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the chambers of the upper tribunal

A

Administrative appeals
Immigration & asylum
Tax & chancery
Lands

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Are upper tribunals subject to JR

A

Not generally - R (Cart) v Upper Tribunal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Tribunal procedure positives and negatives

A

+ Adapted to nature of dispute
Quicker, cheaper, more expert & convenient
Firmly established as part of judicial system
Restructuring strenghtened position

  • Can only deal with cases when express right is given
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are public inquiries

A

A public investigation ordered by the government into a matter of public concern to examine past events & decisions in detail & critically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Give some examples of public inquiries

A

Grenfell tower inquiry
COVID 19 inquiry

17
Q

When can a minister initiate a public inquiry

A

Particular events have caused public concern
Public concern particular events may have occurred

18
Q

What is the function of public inquiries

A

Establish what happened
Determine accountability
Prevent recurrence of event & incorporate findings into public policy

19
Q

What are some drawbacks of public inquiries

A

Limited by their “terms of reference,” which sets out what they can investigate

  • The Saville Inquiry - over time & budget

Minimal legislature or administrative guidance as to how they should be run
Expensive
Not binding & only sanction is public criticism